woo me with science
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Dec-04-11 03:32 PM
Response to Reply #55 |
|
The spin is dizzying around here. You want to extol those three free trade agreements, too? http://robertreich.org / Good grief. |
| -"Obama Is About To Give A Huge Class Warfare Speech" |
Pirate Smile |
Dec-04-11 10:01 AM |
#0 |
 -
"Make no mistake: the three Bush free-trade bills that I just passed with |
MannyGoldstein |
Dec-04-11 10:07 AM |
#1 |
 -
+++++++++++++++ (n/t) |
bread_and_roses |
Dec-04-11 10:09 AM |
#2 |
| -
Well, yeah, I think there's no expectation that he's actually going to support the 99% in it |
saras |
Dec-04-11 10:17 AM |
#4 |
| -
YOU ARE RIGHT ON TARGET |
HowHasItComeToThis |
Dec-04-11 11:13 AM |
#25 |
 -
Yes! nt |
Vanje |
Dec-04-11 01:21 PM |
#47 |
| -
Deleted sub-thread |
Name removed |
Dec-04-11 10:18 AM |
#5 |
| -
All free trade treaties are not exactly alike |
treestar |
Dec-04-11 11:01 AM |
#19 |
| -
Feel free to link to impartial projections showing a net increase in US jobs. |
MannyGoldstein |
Dec-04-11 11:27 AM |
#27 |
| -
that's been done a zillion times |
treestar |
Dec-04-11 11:37 AM |
#32 |
| -
Well, I've yet to see it. |
MannyGoldstein |
Dec-04-11 11:48 AM |
#36 |
| -
"Free-trade Pact US Jobs Gains May be Underestimated" |
bhikkhu |
Dec-04-11 02:59 PM |
#54 |
| -
Can't speak to the Colombia or Panama |
rpannier |
Dec-05-11 01:56 AM |
#80 |
| -
How about an impartial projection? |
MannyGoldstein |
Dec-05-11 06:42 AM |
#82 |
| -
I can just as easliy say those are hardly impartial! |
bhikkhu |
Dec-05-11 10:27 AM |
#88 |
| -
EPI has an agenda? |
MannyGoldstein |
Dec-05-11 05:48 PM |
#93 |
| -
Largely it is the monetary policy |
bhikkhu |
Dec-05-11 07:10 PM |
#94 |
| -
Not according to Michigan. |
Life Long Dem |
Dec-04-11 11:11 AM |
#23 |
| -
Trumka and the AFL-CIO say they're a catastrophe. nt |
MannyGoldstein |
Dec-04-11 11:50 AM |
#37 |
| -
If anyone in the US honestly believes they'll increase the sales of new cars here in Korea |
rpannier |
Dec-05-11 01:53 AM |
#79 |
| -
Ouch. nt |
Zorra |
Dec-05-11 10:39 AM |
#89 |
| -
Deleted sub-thread |
Name removed |
Dec-04-11 10:13 AM |
#3 |
| -
Yeah, I know the drill. |
tblue |
Dec-04-11 10:20 AM |
#6 |
| -
Speech preview |
SixthSense |
Dec-04-11 10:24 AM |
#7 |
| -
Lol! But in between the two: |
tblue |
Dec-04-11 10:49 AM |
#11 |
| -
I think this is going to be the campaign. This view vs. the Republican view & Republicans are going |
Pirate Smile |
Dec-04-11 10:37 AM |
#9 |
| -
Oh great. Another wannabe dictator. |
treestar |
Dec-04-11 11:02 AM |
#20 |
| -
I voted in 2010. And stop taking about my butt. |
tblue |
Dec-04-11 11:12 AM |
#24 |
| -
I don't need a leader |
treestar |
Dec-04-11 11:37 AM |
#31 |
| -
once bitten? make that over and over and over again bitten.... |
robinlynne |
Dec-04-11 10:27 PM |
#77 |
| -
Yeah, like he gives a crap.. He's only doing this now to get votes. Fool me once, |
Lionessa |
Dec-04-11 10:29 AM |
#8 |
| -
Maybe |
ProSense |
Dec-04-11 10:39 AM |
#10 |
| -
Your propaganda hasn't worked on me yet. Not going to today either. |
Lionessa |
Dec-04-11 10:49 AM |
#12 |
| -
I know |
ProSense |
Dec-04-11 10:52 AM |
#13 |
| -
Everything in that list with few exceptions are so ... |
Lionessa |
Dec-04-11 10:54 AM |
#14 |
| -
Good |
ProSense |
Dec-04-11 10:57 AM |
#17 |
| -
I doubt Obama gives 2 shits about what you find shameful.` |
phleshdef |
Dec-04-11 10:59 AM |
#18 |
| -
Or any of the other 99%ers, which is all I've been saying all along. Thanks for verifying. |
Lionessa |
Dec-04-11 11:05 AM |
#22 |
| -
Obama is the only political leader to produce ANY results to help the 99% for the past 3 years. |
phleshdef |
Dec-04-11 11:26 AM |
#26 |
| -
I call your Obama and raise you an Elizabeth Warren. |
Lionessa |
Dec-04-11 11:30 AM |
#30 |
| -
Yes. Elizabeth Warren. A long time friend of Barack Obama and someone that was deliberately elevated |
phleshdef |
Dec-04-11 12:25 PM |
#40 |
| -
You people never end giving all credit to Obama, wow, just wow. |
Lionessa |
Dec-04-11 12:32 PM |
#41 |
| -
Maybe then the problem is with what you have read/heard. n/t |
BzaDem |
Dec-04-11 02:25 PM |
#51 |
| -
I didn't give all credit to Obama and Elizabeth Warren couldn't have been an advisor at all... |
phleshdef |
Dec-04-11 03:04 PM |
#56 |
| -
. |
dionysus |
Dec-05-11 09:15 AM |
#83 |
| -
The perpetually disgruntled are as hair-trigger anti-Obama as the RW. |
Pirate Smile |
Dec-04-11 10:57 AM |
#16 |
| -
I could say being hair-trigger pro-Obama is like being RW pro-Republican. |
tblue |
Dec-04-11 11:04 AM |
#21 |
| -
When he does something you don't like, criticize it. But it makes no sense to bash him when he is |
Pirate Smile |
Dec-04-11 11:29 AM |
#29 |
| -
Deleted message |
Name removed |
Dec-04-11 11:39 AM |
#33 |
| -
Wow. I don't know who you are for winning the next election - certainly not Obama. |
Pirate Smile |
Dec-04-11 11:45 AM |
#34 |
| -
I don't think "dupe" means what you think it means. |
BzaDem |
Dec-04-11 02:27 PM |
#52 |
| -
These folks have absolutely no qualms about showing their true colors |
Number23 |
Dec-04-11 04:52 PM |
#69 |
| -
2011-2012 trusim |
Sheepshank |
Dec-05-11 09:27 AM |
#84 |
| -
Fail. |
JTFrog |
Dec-04-11 10:54 AM |
#15 |
| -
Clock is ticking. |
Ikonoklast |
Dec-04-11 12:52 PM |
#46 |
| -
I think you are projecting n/t |
emulatorloo |
Dec-04-11 04:42 PM |
#64 |
| -
You can only fool people for so long. |
woo me with science |
Dec-04-11 12:42 PM |
#44 |
| -
21 straight months of steady job growth, in spite of all obstruction |
bhikkhu |
Dec-04-11 03:03 PM |
#55 |
| -
Oh for pete's sake. |
woo me with science |
Dec-04-11 03:32 PM |
#59 |
| -
Their point is to grow the economy and create jobs |
bhikkhu |
Dec-04-11 03:37 PM |
#60 |
| -
It's not a matter of "liking" Robert Reich or not, |
woo me with science |
Dec-04-11 05:38 PM |
#72 |
| -
Nevertheless, total job numbers are increasing and the economy is growing |
bhikkhu |
Dec-04-11 06:06 PM |
#73 |
| -
You need to reread the threads. |
woo me with science |
Dec-04-11 08:18 PM |
#75 |
| -
why are you posting on a pro Dem site? n/t |
Sheepshank |
Dec-05-11 05:13 PM |
#92 |
| -
Speech would be more credible if he hadn't waited 2 years, 10 months and 15 days to give it. |
lumberjack_jeff |
Dec-04-11 11:28 AM |
#28 |
| -
True, horses out of barn, had little baby horses and baby horses had babies. |
Safetykitten |
Dec-04-11 11:45 AM |
#35 |
| -
Like |
ProSense |
Dec-04-11 11:57 AM |
#38 |
| -
He gave speeches 2 year, 10 months and 15 days prior; it's just he didn't |
Lionessa |
Dec-04-11 12:35 PM |
#42 |
| -
Past performance is a good indicator of future results. |
lumberjack_jeff |
Dec-04-11 12:37 PM |
#43 |
| -
I'm sure it's not exactly the same speech, but I'm sure the gist of it was |
Lionessa |
Dec-04-11 12:44 PM |
#45 |
| -
If the reality is that Obama is worse than the other major party candidate, then I don't know anyone |
BzaDem |
Dec-04-11 02:29 PM |
#53 |
| -
I'm not sure 2 years, 10 months and 15 days ago Obama would have known |
Sheepshank |
Dec-05-11 09:32 AM |
#85 |
| -
Well, I think that there was a hint in how the Republicans treated Bill Clinton. |
amandabeech |
Dec-05-11 04:21 PM |
#90 |
| -
So? You're saying that's how any President should govern from day one of their Presidency?nt |
Sheepshank |
Dec-05-11 04:51 PM |
#91 |
| -
I think that every President should understand his or her opposition |
amandabeech |
Dec-06-11 05:04 PM |
#96 |
| -
Understanding the opposition is one thing...you were espousing governing method.... |
Sheepshank |
Dec-06-11 05:51 PM |
#97 |
| -
The grass is always greener...... |
lindalou65 |
Dec-04-11 12:13 PM |
#39 |
| -
Full text of Roosevelt's speech at Osawatomie can be read |
Bluenorthwest |
Dec-04-11 01:44 PM |
#48 |
| -
Yes. Indeed. |
Vanje |
Dec-04-11 02:16 PM |
#50 |
| -
Three years is more than enough time to know his real priorities, |
woo me with science |
Dec-04-11 01:59 PM |
#49 |
| -
BS, without evidence. |
bhikkhu |
Dec-04-11 03:06 PM |
#57 |
| -
We have been here for three years, my friend. Have you been paying attention? |
woo me with science |
Dec-04-11 03:26 PM |
#58 |
| -
Ok - I know about all those things |
bhikkhu |
Dec-04-11 03:43 PM |
#62 |
| -
"Some are a stretch to use as any criticism of Obama..." |
woo me with science |
Dec-04-11 05:00 PM |
#70 |
| -
All of that has been hashed over here, over and over again |
bhikkhu |
Dec-04-11 06:48 PM |
#74 |
| -
I will take these one at a time: |
woo me with science |
Dec-04-11 09:10 PM |
#76 |
| -
Your replies are well organized, well thought out, |
bhikkhu |
Dec-05-11 09:09 PM |
#95 |
| -
FDL memes and oversimplification don't carry much weight |
emulatorloo |
Dec-04-11 04:44 PM |
#65 |
| -
Typical eight-word response from you. |
woo me with science |
Dec-04-11 05:05 PM |
#71 |
| -
Ummm...is using a speech by a Republican in his failed bid for the Presidency |
ProfessionalLeftist |
Dec-04-11 03:38 PM |
#61 |
| -
Teddy Roosevelt did a lot of great things as President |
emulatorloo |
Dec-04-11 04:36 PM |
#63 |
| -
True. He puts "typical modern Republicans" (who are batshit crazy) to shame |
ProfessionalLeftist |
Dec-04-11 04:47 PM |
#67 |
| -
"Alleged" Democratic candidate? |
Pirate Smile |
Dec-04-11 04:47 PM |
#66 |
| -
Well, anyone who advocates for cutting SS ... |
ProfessionalLeftist |
Dec-04-11 04:50 PM |
#68 |
| -
I can't find a reference to those words.... |
Sheepshank |
Dec-05-11 09:34 AM |
#86 |
| -
I wish Campaign Obama was President, I really like him. |
Marrah_G |
Dec-05-11 12:34 AM |
#78 |
| -
No, I think you wish words could become laws by magic |
frazzled |
Dec-06-11 06:02 PM |
#98 |
| -
His team has concluded that it will help him get reelected. |
hulka38 |
Dec-05-11 04:55 AM |
#81 |
| -
Oh, pleaee - Obama serves the 1%, not the 99%. Give me |
coalition_unwilling |
Dec-05-11 10:23 AM |
#87 |
Printer-friendly format
Email this thread to a friend
Bookmark this thread