Liberal_Stalwart71
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Nov-27-11 05:36 PM
Response to Reply #52 |
| 62. Thanks for this. Even very strong Obama supporters that I know all like and respect Hillary |
|
Clinton for the outstanding job that she is doing. The derison seems to emanate primarily on the Internets. It doesn't reflect real life, thank goodness!!
|
| -I know this is the GDP, but isn't the most die hard Obama supporter upset by.... |
Logical |
Nov-27-11 10:41 AM |
#0 |
 -
Deleted message |
Name removed |
Nov-27-11 10:45 AM |
#1 |
| -
Let it sink |
liberal N proud |
Nov-27-11 10:46 AM |
#2 |
 -
So you have no answer and do not think it is a legitimate question? |
Logical |
Nov-27-11 10:54 AM |
#5 |
 -
Repealing the PATRIOT Act is not currently plausible, nor was it when Dems held the House. |
TheWraith |
Nov-27-11 01:28 PM |
#32 |
| -
Agreed. The laughably stupid "I know this is GD-P and you guys are die hard supporters" bit |
Number23 |
Nov-27-11 05:29 PM |
# |
| -
Let it rise. |
rug |
Nov-27-11 05:54 PM |
#64 |
| -
Can one be a 'diehard' fan and still be pissed off by decisions like this? Sure! |
Liberal_Stalwart71 |
Nov-27-11 10:48 AM |
#3 |
| -
I am not saying all or nothing, I will 100% vote for Obama for the SCOTUS and the.... |
Logical |
Nov-27-11 10:53 AM |
#4 |
| -
What evidence do we have from HIS ACTIONS that BO will help us with the SCOTUS? |
Vincardog |
Nov-27-11 10:56 AM |
#7 |
| -
I 100% believe any Obama pick will be better than any current GOP candidate pick. |
Logical |
Nov-27-11 10:58 AM |
#9 |
| -
I 100% believe any Obama pick will be better than any OTHER current GOP candidate pick. |
Vincardog |
Nov-27-11 10:59 AM |
#10 |
| -
Deleted sub-thread |
Name removed |
Nov-27-11 10:57 AM |
#8 |
| -
Obama is good on a couple things and really sucky on the rest. |
tblue |
Nov-27-11 11:08 AM |
#11 |
| -
Deleted sub-thread |
Name removed |
Nov-27-11 10:54 AM |
#6 |
| -
Deleted message |
Name removed |
Nov-27-11 11:15 AM |
#12 |
| -
ya know it's not that they still support him |
griffi94 |
Nov-27-11 11:33 AM |
#13 |
| -
"would have the same people screaming bloody murder" ... you know that how? |
JoePhilly |
Nov-27-11 11:56 AM |
#16 |
| -
Deleted message |
Name removed |
Nov-27-11 12:09 PM |
#18 |
| -
Still struggling with who here on DU is now defending the Patriot Act. You're gonna |
Liberal_Stalwart71 |
Nov-27-11 12:13 PM |
#20 |
| -
You seem to assume that those screamed about Bush here on DU |
JoePhilly |
Nov-27-11 12:21 PM |
#22 |
| -
i never once |
griffi94 |
Nov-27-11 12:28 PM |
#24 |
| -
I never suggested you said that .... you said you thought that those who |
JoePhilly |
Nov-27-11 03:10 PM |
#49 |
| -
let me be a little more clear |
griffi94 |
Nov-27-11 04:17 PM |
#54 |
| -
But I still want to know who these defenders are. I haven't seen them, and you're making an unfair, |
Liberal_Stalwart71 |
Nov-27-11 05:30 PM |
#60 |
| -
really? |
griffi94 |
Nov-27-11 06:03 PM |
#65 |
| -
not posting any names publicly |
griffi94 |
Nov-27-11 06:07 PM |
#66 |
| -
Maybe I'll just do a search. I wasn't asking you to cite names. More like pointing me to |
Liberal_Stalwart71 |
Nov-27-11 06:38 PM |
#68 |
| -
sorry that you find it offensive |
griffi94 |
Nov-27-11 06:45 PM |
#69 |
| -
They were also told that we're leaving Iraq and going to Afghanistan! That goal was routinely |
Liberal_Stalwart71 |
Nov-27-11 12:11 PM |
#19 |
| -
do you really want |
griffi94 |
Nov-27-11 12:21 PM |
#21 |
| -
Sure, and my point is that the vast majority of the campaign promises he has kept. |
Liberal_Stalwart71 |
Nov-27-11 12:36 PM |
#26 |
| -
i think if he wanted a public option he would have fought for it |
griffi94 |
Nov-27-11 12:52 PM |
#29 |
| -
Part of my point above (unstated) is that I'm often surprised that |
JoePhilly |
Nov-27-11 12:26 PM |
#23 |
| -
For me, I'm much more of a pragmatist. I struggled to get to the point of accepting Obama |
Liberal_Stalwart71 |
Nov-27-11 12:46 PM |
#27 |
| -
I agree with almost all that you say there. However, I think it is necessary |
rhett o rick |
Nov-27-11 12:59 PM |
#30 |
| -
And you'll get that criticism from me. Let me put it this way... |
Liberal_Stalwart71 |
Nov-27-11 01:20 PM |
#31 |
| -
Again, you didnt say anything that I disagree with. |
rhett o rick |
Nov-27-11 01:39 PM |
#34 |
| -
I wasn't assailing YOU! I was referring to the tone of the OP. |
Liberal_Stalwart71 |
Nov-27-11 01:44 PM |
#36 |
| -
I put myself in that pragmatist camp as well, although for different reasons. |
JoePhilly |
Nov-27-11 02:55 PM |
#48 |
| -
Hear, hear!!! |
Beacool |
Nov-28-11 10:00 AM |
#85 |
| -
Condescension is all over DU, |
Vattel |
Nov-27-11 05:21 PM |
#57 |
| -
Thanks for this post. I appreciate that, though I may not agree 100% |
Liberal_Stalwart71 |
Nov-27-11 05:29 PM |
#59 |
| -
I hope that you are right! |
Vattel |
Nov-28-11 08:16 AM |
#84 |
| -
Seems that way to me as well. |
Fokker Trip |
Nov-28-11 06:11 AM |
#83 |
| -
Let me get this straight, you object to one Bush law/tactic and want Obama to get rid of it by using |
stevenleser |
Nov-30-11 04:37 PM |
#94 |
| -
See my post up thread, #24, and cut the bullshit derision!! |
Liberal_Stalwart71 |
Nov-27-11 12:05 PM |
#17 |
| -
"cut the bullshit derision". In other words, get in line and STFU. |
rhett o rick |
Nov-27-11 12:48 PM |
#28 |
| -
Read #40 post upthread!! Don't STFU! Get angry! Be mad! But don't be naive in the process! |
Liberal_Stalwart71 |
Nov-27-11 01:35 PM |
#33 |
| -
I am working to get more progressives in office. How do you think I am "naive"? nm |
rhett o rick |
Nov-27-11 01:43 PM |
#35 |
| -
That comment was a general "YOU," not you specifically. I guess I should make myself clearer. |
Liberal_Stalwart71 |
Nov-27-11 02:01 PM |
#38 |
| -
Deleted message |
Name removed |
Nov-27-11 01:50 PM |
#37 |
| -
Wow are you way off. There is nothing in my posts about third party. |
rhett o rick |
Nov-27-11 02:40 PM |
#42 |
| -
Please, do you really expect objective reasoning? |
Beacool |
Nov-27-11 11:37 AM |
#14 |
| -
Oh, the irony. |
CakeGrrl |
Nov-27-11 02:33 PM |
#39 |
| -
Why do you even bother!?!? |
Liberal_Stalwart71 |
Nov-27-11 02:40 PM |
#41 |
| -
For the viewers at home, let's say. |
CakeGrrl |
Nov-27-11 02:41 PM |
#43 |
| -
Got it!!! ;) |
Liberal_Stalwart71 |
Nov-27-11 02:43 PM |
#46 |
| -
The Kool-Aid is ever so strong with some............. |
Beacool |
Nov-27-11 09:04 PM |
#79 |
| -
Some people genuinely like the Patriot Act and warrantless wire taps |
Zorra |
Nov-27-11 11:50 AM |
#15 |
| -
Yep - including a lot of Demcrats in Congress. n/t |
progressoid |
Nov-30-11 02:41 PM |
#93 |
| -
"I know this is the GDP, but . . ." |
grantcart |
Nov-27-11 12:29 PM |
#25 |
| -
Yeah, I unrecced for the snark alone. |
CakeGrrl |
Nov-27-11 02:34 PM |
#40 |
| -
Deleted message |
Name removed |
Nov-27-11 02:42 PM |
#45 |
| -
Deleted sub-thread |
Name removed |
Nov-27-11 02:44 PM |
#47 |
| -
No, the GDP tends to be more pro-Obama than the GD. Not an insult unless you think... |
Logical |
Nov-27-11 02:42 PM |
#44 |
| -
It's ridiculously sad that there is this division! It's pathetic! |
Liberal_Stalwart71 |
Nov-27-11 03:10 PM |
#50 |
| -
I think the division is a byproduct of internet discussion forums |
ruggerson |
Nov-27-11 04:14 PM |
#52 |
| -
Thanks for this. Even very strong Obama supporters that I know all like and respect Hillary |
Liberal_Stalwart71 |
Nov-27-11 05:36 PM |
#62 |
| -
Deleted sub-thread |
Name removed |
Nov-27-11 04:37 PM |
#55 |
| -
Deleted message |
Name removed |
Nov-27-11 05:40 PM |
#63 |
| -
Not an insult but it is dripping with condescension. Not an adviseable polemical |
grantcart |
Nov-27-11 03:19 PM |
#51 |
| -
I would guess that many people here have given up on that objective |
ruggerson |
Nov-27-11 04:16 PM |
#53 |
| -
You really think there is no obvious between the forums? Really?? |
Logical |
Nov-27-11 04:43 PM |
#56 |
| -
Deleted sub-thread |
Name removed |
Nov-27-11 07:29 PM |
#73 |
| -
This from a poster who has called DUers "the herd at DU?" |
Ignis |
Nov-29-11 04:00 PM |
#92 |
| -
On national secuirty stuff like this I give the President the benefit of the doubt. |
DCBob |
Nov-27-11 05:28 PM |
#58 |
| -
Deleted message |
Name removed |
Nov-27-11 05:33 PM |
#61 |
| -
And they were wrong because Bush did not deserve the benefit of the doubt. |
DCBob |
Nov-27-11 06:33 PM |
#67 |
| -
No, not really. Because just being OK with someone because they lead your party... |
Logical |
Nov-27-11 07:20 PM |
#71 |
| -
its not just because he leads our party, its because I trust his judgment. |
DCBob |
Nov-27-11 08:53 PM |
#76 |
| -
not a die-hard supporter |
elana i am |
Nov-27-11 07:09 PM |
#70 |
| -
Deleted message |
Name removed |
Nov-27-11 07:26 PM |
#72 |
| -
Are you actually implying that DU posters CHEER drone strikes? |
CakeGrrl |
Nov-27-11 07:37 PM |
#74 |
| -
Deleted message |
Name removed |
Nov-27-11 09:04 PM |
#77 |
| -
I don't expect to agree with Obama all of the time |
treestar |
Nov-27-11 08:43 PM |
#75 |
| -
No...No. The Patriot Act is to Protect Us and if Obama says it need Expansion... |
KoKo |
Nov-27-11 09:04 PM |
#78 |
| -
We gotta protect 'Murka from those evil terrorists that hate us for our freedom |
Cali_Democrat |
Nov-27-11 09:10 PM |
#80 |
| -
Like posts above state, it's about trusting his judgement. |
great white snark |
Nov-28-11 02:59 AM |
#81 |
| -
I hope that this was sarcasm. |
Beacool |
Nov-28-11 10:15 AM |
#86 |
| -
Maybe it isn't. |
CakeGrrl |
Nov-28-11 12:28 PM |
#87 |
| -
It should be............ |
Beacool |
Nov-28-11 12:52 PM |
#89 |
| -
Deleted message |
Name removed |
Nov-28-11 03:19 AM |
#82 |
| -
I won't be voting for anyone who supports the PA |
Ter |
Nov-28-11 12:44 PM |
#88 |
| -
Whad is this shit...promote GOPer Post? Fucking GOPers and their Lie Cheat Steal M.O. |
opihimoimoi |
Nov-28-11 06:47 PM |
#90 |
| -
Yes, and now they want the military to be able come get you in your yard. |
woo me with science |
Nov-28-11 06:54 PM |
#91 |
Printer-friendly format
Email this thread to a friend
Bookmark this thread