You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #136: Once again: CORROBORATION ISN'T PROOF. [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU
Remember Me Donating Member (730 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-28-11 10:14 AM
Response to Reply #130
136. Once again: CORROBORATION ISN'T PROOF.
It's just another voice saying, yeah, that's what happened. But it's not in and of itself proof.

And where you've got whistleblowers -- which the unnamed source is -- you're not likely to find any corroboration, let alone PROOF (unless the whistleblower is able to provide some sort of documents).

You people pretend to be naive about these things. Clever ruse.



Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 

Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC