You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login

Reply #21: IMHO. Wolf SUCKS. You might as well have Kim Kardashian leading [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU
Laura PourMeADrink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-22-11 09:04 PM
Response to Original message
21. IMHO. Wolf SUCKS. You might as well have Kim Kardashian leading
this debate. Virtually ZERO followup for these dunces.

I actually would be the least scared if Newt or Huntsman got in. The rest are very scary. But, would love
Ron Paul to decriminalize pot
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
  -If anyone is watching this Republican debate tonight, and has an opinion teddy51  Nov-22-11 08:03 PM   #0 
  - I am in agreement. nt  Skip Intro   Nov-22-11 08:09 PM   #1 
  - and that is why Huntsman will never get the nomination /nt  still_one   Nov-22-11 08:09 PM   #2 
  - Your absolutely correct, and I still think he should switch parties, and run in 2012.  teddy51   Nov-22-11 08:11 PM   #3 
  - So you'd vote for him over Obama? He is very conservative compared to Obama. n/t  jenmito   Nov-22-11 08:15 PM   #5 
  - A serious answer, I don't know. There are so many things about  teddy51   Nov-22-11 08:25 PM   #9 
     - But you said you wish Huntsman would change parties and run in '12.  jenmito   Nov-22-11 08:44 PM   #13 
        - In case you have forgotten, we had a veto proof majority  golfguru   Nov-25-11 03:02 PM   #55 
           - I think you mean fillibuster-proof...  Foolacious   Nov-25-11 03:57 PM   #56 
              - OOps, thanks for that correction, yes I meant 60 senators=filibuster proof  golfguru   Nov-25-11 07:06 PM   #57 
  - He loves the Ryan Plan  catgirl   Nov-22-11 08:22 PM   #6 
     - First of all I never said I knew anything about Huntsman, but said that he was the  teddy51   Nov-22-11 08:32 PM   #12 
        - You said he should switch parties and run in 2012  catgirl   Nov-22-11 08:48 PM   #16 
           - Well first of all I never said which party he should swicth to, and I do believe that  teddy51   Nov-22-11 08:55 PM   #18 
              - You clearly implied he should switch to the Dem. party. R and D are the only major parties. n/t  jenmito   Nov-22-11 09:03 PM   #20 
              - So presume that I said he should switch from R to D and run 2012, what would  teddy51   Nov-22-11 09:11 PM   #24 
                 - Wow. Really?: "I am not certain that Huntsman is a Republican, anymore than I am convinced that  jenmito   Nov-22-11 09:23 PM   #28 
                    - Thats correct, did I stutter somewhere in my post? n/t  teddy51   Nov-22-11 09:35 PM   #29 
                       - You said earlier that you didn't say which party Huntsman should switch to. Now the  jenmito   Nov-22-11 09:46 PM   #30 
                          - Huntsman has less than zero chance of being elected President, but as far as I am  teddy51   Nov-22-11 09:55 PM   #35 
                             - Nice try. You have no idea what you're talking about regarding Huntsman, and I answered you  jenmito   Nov-22-11 10:01 PM   #36 
                                - Deleted message  Name removed   Nov-22-11 10:03 PM   #38 
                                   - Either you DON'T read or you CAN'T read. I've listed about 3 of Huntsman's positions that  jenmito   Nov-23-11 10:11 AM   #50 
              - Based on a Real Clear Politics article?  catgirl   Nov-22-11 09:04 PM   #22 
  - Huntsman has been getting lots of applause. And the MSM has been doing their best to  jenmito   Nov-22-11 08:13 PM   #4 
     - They're not trying to boost Huntsman  catgirl   Nov-22-11 08:27 PM   #10 
  - I couldn't stand 1 nanosecond of that bs. It's as worthless as a tabloid. nt  Sarah Ibarruri   Nov-22-11 08:23 PM   #7 
  - I tried watching for 10 minutes.. they are all Pschopaths....  lib2DaBone   Nov-22-11 08:23 PM   #8 
  - Why? What's there to see?  cheapdate   Nov-22-11 08:28 PM   #11 
  - Kain on foreign policy is gold, every time. Haha  joshcryer   Nov-22-11 08:45 PM   #14 
  - saw Paul Wolfowitz  riverwalker   Nov-22-11 08:46 PM   #15 
  - Evil incarnate.  FailureToCommunicate   Nov-22-11 09:49 PM   #33 
  - That's understandable  Cali_Democrat   Nov-23-11 01:09 PM   #52 
  - Huntsman just made a batshit crazy  riverwalker   Nov-22-11 08:50 PM   #17 
  - Mormons are from the "House of Israel"  catgirl   Nov-22-11 09:18 PM   #26 
  - Ron Paul onTaliban  pettypace   Nov-22-11 08:58 PM   #19 
  - Ron Paul is an isolationist.  ellisonz   Nov-22-11 10:13 PM   #39 
  - IMHO. Wolf SUCKS. You might as well have Kim Kardashian leading  Laura PourMeADrink   Nov-22-11 09:04 PM   #21 
  - Newt doesn't scare you?  catgirl   Nov-22-11 09:09 PM   #23 
     - Nope. It's like his beliefs are based on reasoned analysis. Not  Laura PourMeADrink   Nov-22-11 09:13 PM   #25 
     - Do you know his history?  catgirl   Nov-22-11 09:22 PM   #27 
        - So what are you so afraid of then? There is no way in hell that any of these  teddy51   Nov-22-11 09:48 PM   #31 
        - Except for Huntsman, who you wish would become a Dem. and primary Obama...  jenmito   Nov-22-11 09:54 PM   #34 
        - So what do you know about Huntsman that you think is so detructive to our current Democracy (that  teddy51   Nov-22-11 10:01 PM   #37 
        - Oy Vey.  ellisonz   Nov-22-11 10:16 PM   #41 
        - I dunno about that...  ellisonz   Nov-22-11 10:15 PM   #40 
           - If the American people are that stupid, then we deserve what we get.  teddy51   Nov-22-11 10:22 PM   #42 
              - Ahh...nothing like collective punishment.  ellisonz   Nov-22-11 10:41 PM   #45 
                 - Oh fuck, here we go again! No I don't know where Western Rome was when it fell.  teddy51   Nov-22-11 10:44 PM   #46 
                 - I'm not going to enlighten you.  ellisonz   Nov-22-11 10:49 PM   #48 
                    - The point is, who cares about Western Rome? The Roman Empire fell, thats  teddy51   Nov-22-11 11:18 PM   #49 
                 - And governed by Christians.  greiner3   Nov-25-11 02:30 PM   #54 
        - What a great website! nt  Stardust   Nov-22-11 10:27 PM   #43 
     - Yessss!  Politicalboi   Nov-22-11 09:49 PM   #32 
  - None of them are worth a bucket of spit!  yortsed snacilbuper   Nov-22-11 10:39 PM   #44 
  - Am I the only one who finds it ironic  in venere veritas   Nov-22-11 10:48 PM   #47 
  - Clown town  SmittynMo   Nov-23-11 01:08 PM   #51 
  - Paul holds some Christian Dominionist views. So he's not "not crazy."  blkmusclmachine   Nov-23-11 01:56 PM   #53 

Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators

Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC