One of the 99
(7 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Nov-20-11 05:25 PM
Response to Reply #124 |
| -WP: Obama never secretly killed the public option. It’s a myth |
dennis4868 |
Nov-17-11 11:10 PM |
#0 |
-
Deleted sub-thread |
Name removed |
Nov-17-11 11:28 PM |
#1 |
-
When people want to believe something, facts aren't a requirement. Recommend. nt |
gateley |
Nov-17-11 11:32 PM |
#2 |
 -
... |
young but wise |
Nov-17-11 11:51 PM |
#3 |
 -
Faith trumps logic. |
boppers |
Nov-18-11 02:29 AM |
#20 |
-
K&R. |
young but wise |
Nov-17-11 11:52 PM |
#4 |
-
Make the Senate sell the PO as an alternative.... |
Historic NY |
Nov-17-11 11:56 PM |
#5 |
 -
I agree with your assessment. Looking back, I wonder how it was that |
CTyankee |
Nov-18-11 03:28 PM |
#102 |
-
I knew this was never the case |
BlueCaliDem |
Nov-17-11 11:58 PM |
#6 |
 -
This is what is forgotten by Dems...I find. n/t |
vaberella |
Nov-18-11 01:45 AM |
#19 |
  -
I find that same conclusion, vaberella. eom |
BlueCaliDem |
Nov-18-11 07:54 PM |
#127 |
 -
+a jillion |
BlancheSplanchnik |
Nov-18-11 11:50 AM |
#77 |
-
Thanks, BlancheSplanchnik. And you're so right. |
BlueCaliDem |
Nov-18-11 07:56 PM |
#128 |
-
219 and 60 |
Kennah |
Nov-18-11 12:01 AM |
#7 |
 -
+535 |
ellisonz |
Nov-18-11 12:55 AM |
#14 |
 -
+1000000000000000000000000000 |
dennis4868 |
Nov-18-11 01:08 AM |
#15 |
 -
We never ever had the 60. |
MjolnirTime |
Nov-18-11 10:10 AM |
#60 |
  -
Kennah's referring to the final bill that did pass |
BklnDem75 |
Nov-18-11 10:39 AM |
#68 |
 -
And it took how many MONTHS of pounding, massaging, deal-making, pressure, etcetera... |
TheWraith |
Nov-18-11 03:44 PM |
#107 |
-
The public option was killed by Evan Bayn and Ben Nelson. |
blueclown |
Nov-18-11 12:04 AM |
#8 |
 -
He could have let the single-payer reps into the room. That's how you get a public option. |
robinlynne |
Nov-18-11 12:06 AM |
#9 |
  -
Agreed that there should have been single-payer representatives at the hearings. |
blueclown |
Nov-18-11 12:08 AM |
#10 |
  -
I'm sorry to say your statement is laughable. If the PO had no chance; how would single payer? |
vaberella |
Nov-18-11 01:34 AM |
#17 |
 -
Laughable? Then you didn't understand the point, or maybe negotiating. |
cui bono |
Nov-18-11 03:17 AM |
#22 |
  -
Caved almost immediately? |
BklnDem75 |
Nov-18-11 10:46 AM |
#70 |
  -
You're under the mistaken belief that negotiation automatically means meeting in the middle. |
TheWraith |
Nov-18-11 07:27 PM |
#124 |
 -
+1 |
treestar |
Nov-19-11 05:00 PM |
#145 |
 -
Good point! nt |
One of the 99 |
Nov-20-11 05:25 PM |
#151 |
 -
Not laughable but unrealistic. |
One of the 99 |
Nov-20-11 05:23 PM |
#150 |
 -
He fought. I never saw someone going to bat for the Public Option so much. |
vaberella |
Nov-18-11 01:30 AM |
#16 |
  -
When did he fight? Can you provide some evidence of that? |
cui bono |
Nov-18-11 10:13 AM |
#62 |
 -
I don't recall your version of events at all |
BklnDem75 |
Nov-18-11 10:21 AM |
#64 |
 -
Don't forget Joe Lieberman. He publicly opposed the public option, as well. |
flpoljunkie |
Nov-18-11 06:47 AM |
#30 |
  -
+1 |
young but wise |
Nov-18-11 09:19 PM |
#132 |
 -
Progressives had been fighting for an individual mandate for years? nt |
Mojorabbit |
Nov-18-11 08:19 PM |
#130 |
-
Same thing as the lie that Pres. Obama called Americans "Lazy"..... |
FrenchieCat |
Nov-18-11 12:15 AM |
#11 |
-
No, it was single-payer that he avoided like the plague - wouldn't even talk about it |
slay |
Nov-18-11 12:19 AM |
#12 |
 -
Actually. The health care debate was being derailed before it started. |
vaberella |
Nov-18-11 01:39 AM |
#18 |
  -
Only because congress is completely corrupt - they don't give a shit about us |
slay |
Nov-18-11 02:37 AM |
#21 |
 -
Bingo |
Enthusiast |
Nov-18-11 04:52 AM |
#24 |
  -
Bwhaahaha... "Bingo" is when someone actually makes a valid point. |
The Doctor. |
Nov-18-11 03:11 PM |
#99 |
 -
Oh BS |
treestar |
Nov-19-11 05:02 PM |
#146 |
 -
Single Payer was never an option because out would immediately wipe out the Insurance industry |
MjolnirTime |
Nov-18-11 10:12 AM |
#61 |
-
No, it can happen all at once without causing any lasting harm. |
The Doctor. |
Nov-18-11 03:14 PM |
#100 |
 -
The Insurance Industry is 18% of the economy. It would most certainly be harmful to cut its throat. |
MjolnirTime |
Nov-19-11 02:46 PM |
#143 |
 -
Those assertions require a lot more proof |
treestar |
Nov-19-11 05:03 PM |
#147 |
-
I think it much more likely we will end up with a dual tier system like France where... |
stevenleser |
Nov-21-11 09:40 AM |
#153 |
-
Everyone already knows all of this |
Number23 |
Nov-18-11 12:55 AM |
#13 |
 -
this rewriting history makes me very cynical |
Enrique |
Nov-18-11 08:13 AM |
#39 |
  -
Amen, my brother. Even when he massively fails, "it's not his fault."nt |
mistertrickster |
Nov-18-11 10:50 AM |
#72 |
  -
This is not hard, people! |
Number23 |
Nov-18-11 02:05 PM |
#94 |
   -
If you want to seem to be the cool outside revolutionary that gets it. Then it is hard to accept |
stevenleser |
Nov-21-11 09:42 AM |
#155 |
  -
Then don't rewrite history to suit what you would like to believe. nt |
stevenleser |
Nov-21-11 09:41 AM |
#154 |
 -
+1 |
shellgame26 |
Nov-18-11 10:25 AM |
#65 |
 -
If it had no chance of passing, why did the President demand that it MUST pass? |
mistertrickster |
Nov-18-11 10:48 AM |
#71 |
-
What is it that you are not understanding? |
Number23 |
Nov-18-11 02:14 PM |
#95 |
-
"Any bill I sign must include an insurance exchange..." |
boppers |
Nov-18-11 04:48 AM |
#23 |
 -
Clarifying that the full quote included a public option. |
eomer |
Nov-18-11 05:43 AM |
#27 |
-
He's not tracking records enough! |
boppers |
Nov-18-11 05:58 AM |
#28 |
 -
The point of the OP is Obama's position (at that time) on the public option. |
eomer |
Nov-18-11 06:10 AM |
#29 |
-
The point is selectively claiming that a later clause has the same weight as a primary requirement. |
boppers |
Nov-19-11 12:18 AM |
#136 |
-
boppers got it right |
BklnDem75 |
Nov-18-11 10:35 AM |
#67 |
-
What about the other five times he's on record demanding a public option? |
mistertrickster |
Nov-18-11 10:55 AM |
#73 |
-
Never said he didn't want a public option |
BklnDem75 |
Nov-18-11 11:13 AM |
#75 |
-
Who claimed it was the "focus"? Just because "public option" |
mistertrickster |
Nov-18-11 11:40 AM |
#76 |
-
Why wouldn't he? |
BklnDem75 |
Nov-18-11 12:11 PM |
#79 |
-
"Shibboleth" is the Hebrew word for 'public option'. n/t |
Davis_X_Machina |
Nov-18-11 05:15 AM |
#25 |
-
Those "facts" are not totally factual. And, besides, they miss the main point. |
eomer |
Nov-18-11 05:19 AM |
#26 |
 -
Joe Lieberman was never going to vote for it, period. |
JoePhilly |
Nov-18-11 06:48 AM |
#31 |
  -
Obama did not need Lieberman's vote. He needed 49 Democratic Senators plus Independent Sen. Sanders |
eomer |
Nov-18-11 07:19 AM |
#35 |
   -
It takes 60 votes to end a filibuster before the Senate can vote on a bill |
emulatorloo |
Nov-18-11 08:32 AM |
#44 |
  -
A budget reconciliation bill cannot be filibustered and thus requires only 50 Senators, plus the VP. |
eomer |
Nov-18-11 09:28 AM |
#53 |
  -
Ah ... I've heard this arguement before. So let's review ... |
JoePhilly |
Nov-18-11 02:52 PM |
#96 |
  -
Well, yes, they could have "slipped" it into 4872 and it would have needed just a simple majority. |
eomer |
Nov-18-11 03:45 PM |
#108 |
  -
You seem to not understand my use of the phrase "slipped in" ... |
JoePhilly |
Nov-18-11 05:14 PM |
#110 |
  -
Lieberman was never going to allow that to happen in a bill under regular process. |
eomer |
Nov-19-11 03:29 AM |
#137 |
  -
and Obama campaigned for Joe Lieberman |
Enrique |
Nov-18-11 08:24 AM |
#42 |
 -
And Liebermann betrayed him by campaigning for McCain and killing the Public Option |
emulatorloo |
Nov-18-11 08:36 AM |
#48 |
 -
Lieberman did not kill the public option, Democrats did. |
eomer |
Nov-18-11 09:37 AM |
#54 |
  -
Because reconciliation votes don't require 60 |
BklnDem75 |
Nov-18-11 11:07 AM |
#74 |
 -
You've got it mixed up. Reconciliation bills require only 50 votes. They don't need 60 Democrats. |
eomer |
Nov-18-11 12:17 PM |
#82 |
 -
Sanders tried, they didn't have 50 |
BklnDem75 |
Nov-18-11 01:17 PM |
#90 |
 -
I don't assume that. Quite the opposite, I said I blame those Democrats for not supporting the PO. |
eomer |
Nov-18-11 01:53 PM |
#93 |
 -
Considering repukes didn't have 41 votes until Walker, |
BklnDem75 |
Nov-18-11 02:57 PM |
#97 |
 -
Enough people did support it. Enough corporations didn't. |
eomer |
Nov-18-11 04:06 PM |
#109 |
 -
You saying enough did doesn't make it so |
BklnDem75 |
Nov-18-11 06:11 PM |
#113 |
 -
timelines aside, it still speaks to obama's poor judgement |
frylock |
Nov-18-11 12:12 PM |
#80 |
 -
Poor judgement would be propping your colleague's opponent |
BklnDem75 |
Nov-18-11 12:23 PM |
#84 |
 -
another bit of reality that people ignore: |
ChairmanAgnostic |
Nov-18-11 08:34 AM |
#45 |
  -
Do you have a link for his admission? Not challenging your assertion, I'd just like to read it. |
eomer |
Nov-18-11 09:42 AM |
#55 |
 -
I believe it was last February, and I do have it stored |
ChairmanAgnostic |
Nov-18-11 10:27 AM |
#66 |
 -
A public option "paying Medicare rates" couldn't even get 200 votes in the House. |
BzaDem |
Nov-20-11 10:15 AM |
#149 |
-
He certainly didn't give it mouth-to-ear resuscitation. n/t |
Scuba |
Nov-18-11 06:52 AM |
#32 |
 -
+1 n/t |
ejbr |
Nov-18-11 05:35 PM |
#112 |
-
Huge surprise there |
BklnDem75 |
Nov-18-11 07:07 AM |
#33 |
-
K&R. Facts are good...nt |
SidDithers |
Nov-18-11 07:10 AM |
#34 |
 -
yeah, so read post 29 |
zipplewrath |
Nov-18-11 08:07 AM |
#38 |
-
No proof that it happened does not mean it did not happen. |
Laelth |
Nov-18-11 07:39 AM |
#36 |
 -
Sounds like a very religious explanation - see post 22 |
emulatorloo |
Nov-18-11 08:37 AM |
#49 |
-
Deleted message |
Name removed |
Nov-18-11 12:50 PM |
#87 |
-
the White House admitted the deal |
Enrique |
Nov-18-11 07:56 AM |
#37 |
 -
And it is buried in the definitions |
zipplewrath |
Nov-18-11 08:14 AM |
#40 |
 -
Got a link? |
BklnDem75 |
Nov-18-11 08:34 AM |
#46 |
  -
It's all here and more... pbs.org |
court jester |
Nov-18-11 09:02 AM |
#52 |
 -
That looks like a drug cost deal |
BklnDem75 |
Nov-18-11 09:58 AM |
#57 |
 -
Link? |
emulatorloo |
Nov-18-11 08:39 AM |
#50 |
 -
Deleted message |
Name removed |
Nov-18-11 10:13 AM |
#63 |
-
. |
unapatriciated |
Nov-18-11 08:22 AM |
#41 |
-
Washington Post? |
pmorlan1 |
Nov-18-11 08:28 AM |
#43 |
 -
LOL. There is that. |
ChairmanAgnostic |
Nov-18-11 08:34 AM |
#47 |
 -
Please cite instances of where Greg Sargent's Plumline blog has published false information |
emulatorloo |
Nov-18-11 08:41 AM |
#51 |
 -
It's used to smear this President all the time |
BklnDem75 |
Nov-18-11 10:02 AM |
#58 |
 -
Deleted message |
Name removed |
Nov-18-11 01:08 PM |
#89 |
 -
I'm fascinated by this ever more popular tactic. "Source-bias" is quite the tool of tools. |
The Doctor. |
Nov-18-11 03:19 PM |
#101 |
-
K & R |
Tarheel_Dem |
Nov-18-11 09:51 AM |
#56 |
-
Only those who wanted an excuse to jump ship bought into this. |
MjolnirTime |
Nov-18-11 10:09 AM |
#59 |
-
Facts are stubborn things . . . especially when they're in print and on videotape: |
mistertrickster |
Nov-18-11 10:40 AM |
#69 |
 -
You posted that before... |
BklnDem75 |
Nov-18-11 03:28 PM |
#103 |
-
Deleted message |
Name removed |
Nov-19-11 10:29 AM |
#139 |
-
Good luck |
BklnDem75 |
Nov-19-11 04:56 PM |
#144 |
-
Deleted message |
Name removed |
Nov-18-11 12:09 PM |
#78 |
 -
religion?! take the plank out of your own eye, buddy |
frylock |
Nov-18-11 12:24 PM |
#85 |
 -
I neither know nor care whether Obama directly killed the public option himself. |
mistertrickster |
Nov-18-11 12:49 PM |
#86 |
-
Only the dark side deals in absolutes... |
BklnDem75 |
Nov-18-11 03:37 PM |
#104 |
-
When you can't win on the merits of the argument, go for the motives of the poster. |
mistertrickster |
Nov-19-11 10:17 AM |
#138 |
 -
Lighten up Francis... |
BklnDem75 |
Nov-19-11 12:06 PM |
#141 |
-
BTW, Brooklyn Dem, have you gotten out from behind your keyboard |
mistertrickster |
Nov-19-11 10:44 AM |
#140 |
-
I don't work near Zuccotti Park... yet |
BklnDem75 |
Nov-19-11 12:09 PM |
#142 |
-
Deleted message |
Name removed |
Nov-19-11 05:18 PM |
#148 |
-
That's the problem with secret deals: They're made in secret. |
Cowpunk |
Nov-18-11 12:13 PM |
#81 |
 -
Entertainment attorney... um... yeah... |
BklnDem75 |
Nov-18-11 03:39 PM |
#105 |
-
a veritable wind tunnel of spin! |
Donnachaidh |
Nov-18-11 12:19 PM |
#83 |
-
K&R |
flamingdem |
Nov-18-11 12:58 PM |
#88 |
-
Thanks but it won't make any difference. |
great white snark |
Nov-18-11 01:35 PM |
#91 |
-
I've never even heard that |
Skittles |
Nov-18-11 01:48 PM |
#92 |
 -
That's a myth too |
BklnDem75 |
Nov-18-11 03:40 PM |
#106 |
-
BULLSHIT |
Skittles |
Nov-18-11 06:11 PM |
#114 |
-
Sad but true... |
BklnDem75 |
Nov-18-11 06:23 PM |
#116 |
-
Deleted message |
Name removed |
Nov-18-11 07:12 PM |
#120 |
-
Um... no. I won't do your job |
BklnDem75 |
Nov-18-11 07:16 PM |
#122 |
-
No surprise at all. |
The Doctor. |
Nov-18-11 03:05 PM |
#98 |
-
I saw Obama being |
femrap |
Nov-18-11 05:27 PM |
#111 |
 -
LOL sure... |
BklnDem75 |
Nov-18-11 06:20 PM |
#115 |
-
Deleted message |
Name removed |
Nov-18-11 07:12 PM |
#121 |
 -
Deleted message |
Name removed |
Nov-18-11 07:24 PM |
#123 |
-
Deleted message |
Name removed |
Nov-18-11 10:26 PM |
#134 |
-
Does that mean you have nothing to back your claim? |
BklnDem75 |
Nov-19-11 12:16 AM |
#135 |
-
Not only did he make a backroom deal, he lied to the American people and claimed |
woo me with science |
Nov-18-11 06:45 PM |
#117 |
 -
I'm gonna side with the OP on this one |
BklnDem75 |
Nov-18-11 06:52 PM |
#118 |
-
Deleted sub-thread |
Name removed |
Nov-18-11 06:53 PM |
#119 |
-
Ah, a response! |
woo me with science |
Nov-18-11 07:37 PM |
#126 |
-
"There were certainly two significant deals that the White House made with interest groups. |
rug |
Nov-18-11 07:31 PM |
#125 |
-
"Facts are stupid things." - Ronald Reagan |
UrbScotty |
Nov-18-11 08:06 PM |
#129 |
-
"I know we are supposed to blame Obama for everything at this website" |
kath |
Nov-18-11 09:06 PM |
#131 |
-
Not only are you right, Dennis, but if the Democrats lose in the Supreme Court, |
Major Hogwash |
Nov-18-11 09:39 PM |
#133 |
-
Obama only secretly kills people. |
MNBrewer |
Nov-20-11 07:54 PM |
#152 |