You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login

Reply #41: Wrong. This is what I actually said. --> [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU
ClarkUSA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-19-11 09:05 PM
Response to Reply #40
41. Wrong. This is what I actually said. -->
Edited on Sat Nov-19-11 09:11 PM by ClarkUSA
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
  -W.H. with the '99 percent'-ers: Pres. Obama said he "sympathizes with protesters' broad grievances" ClarkUSA  Oct-16-11 07:48 PM   #0 
  - Yes we camp!  gateley   Oct-16-11 08:29 PM   #1 
  - "And spelled correctly." lol  ClarkUSA   Oct-16-11 10:01 PM   #2 
  - Kick for those who missed it  ClarkUSA   Nov-19-11 05:09 PM   #3 
  - So why hasn't he  polmaven   Nov-19-11 05:47 PM   #4 
  - Because that's patently ridiculous, dangerous, and absurd? nt  TheWraith   Nov-20-11 03:34 PM   #51 
     - Well, of course,  polmaven   Nov-21-11 08:23 AM   #139 
  - That's all well and good.  Brigid   Nov-19-11 06:20 PM   #5 
  - Both OWS and police have done their share of wrongdoing and should stop it.  ClarkUSA   Nov-19-11 06:35 PM   #6 
     - They're still looking for the hammer.  rug   Nov-19-11 07:15 PM   #9 
     - You're still looking for relevance. Gratuitous flashing of a unrelated photo = violence porn.  ClarkUSA   Nov-19-11 07:24 PM   #10 
        - Yes I suppose of a picture of someone who's skull is fractured by the police is irrelevant.  rug   Nov-19-11 07:26 PM   #11 
           - That's a nonsensical stretch. It's irrelevant to your accompanying "hammer" rhetoric.  ClarkUSA   Nov-19-11 07:29 PM   #12 
              - You're the one saying protesters are attacking police with hammers.  rug   Nov-19-11 07:33 PM   #13 
                 - That's a false statement. An OWS protester attacked police cars with a hammer.  ClarkUSA   Nov-19-11 07:35 PM   #15 
                    - Equating police violence with these protests to make brownie points for POTUS is disgusting.  rug   Nov-19-11 07:43 PM   #17 
                       - WTF are you spewing now? Making up strawman arguments in order to attack the POTUS is disgusting.  ClarkUSA   Nov-19-11 07:46 PM   #18 
                          - Read your headline before you sputter.  rug   Nov-19-11 07:52 PM   #21 
                             - My headline is factual, unlike your personal attack rhetoric.  ClarkUSA   Nov-19-11 07:53 PM   #23 
                                - So is that photo. Unlike your lame line about seeking relevance.  rug   Nov-19-11 08:05 PM   #25 
                                   - Your snide "hammer" aside was irrelevant to the violence porn.  ClarkUSA   Nov-19-11 08:08 PM   #27 
                                      - Anyone who cared would not equate the protests he supports with the police violence against them.  rug   Nov-19-11 08:14 PM   #29 
                                         - Anyone who values the truth would not continue to make strawman arguments.  ClarkUSA   Nov-19-11 08:16 PM   #30 
                                            - I agree. Hence my disagreement with you.  rug   Nov-19-11 08:20 PM   #33 
                                               - I'm dubious, considering you keep making false claims about what I said.  ClarkUSA   Nov-19-11 08:24 PM   #34 
                                                  - I'm looking deep inside that sentence but I have yet to find sense in it.  rug   Nov-19-11 08:25 PM   #36 
                                                  - I have yet to find sense of your strawman argument re: what I said.  ClarkUSA   Nov-19-11 08:27 PM   #37 
     - Where was molotov cocktail thrown?  Hutzpa   Nov-19-11 07:34 PM   #14 
     - Utah. A 20 year old threw one at a Wells Fargo bank.  ClarkUSA   Nov-19-11 07:42 PM   #16 
        - You are citing one instances where molotov cocktail was prevented  Hutzpa   Nov-19-11 08:47 PM   #40 
           - Wrong. This is what I actually said. -->  ClarkUSA   Nov-19-11 09:05 PM   #41 
     - Huh? Where are you getting this?  Brigid   Nov-19-11 07:46 PM   #19 
     - Google is your friend. I read the news. I've been down with OWS in Zucotti/Liberty Plaza Park.  ClarkUSA   Nov-19-11 07:52 PM   #20 
        - So this justifies brutality against those who had nothing to do with that?  Brigid   Nov-19-11 08:06 PM   #26 
           - That's a strawman argument. I never said that. You asked, I answered.  ClarkUSA   Nov-19-11 08:11 PM   #28 
              - You don't seem to have a problem with police brutality.  Brigid   Nov-19-11 08:17 PM   #31 
                 - You don't seem to have a problem with making ridiculous comments about people you don't know.  ClarkUSA   Nov-19-11 08:19 PM   #32 
                    - Yes, I can see your point.  Brigid   Nov-19-11 08:27 PM   #38 
                       - Apples and oranges. Gaddafi was threatening genocide. Syria's Assad is slaughtering his own people.  ClarkUSA   Nov-19-11 08:41 PM   #39 
                          - So we can expect the same for the guy who pepper sprayed  Hutzpa   Nov-19-11 09:12 PM   #42 
                             - If people make as big a stink about it as we did about that NYPD chief, that could happen.  ClarkUSA   Nov-19-11 09:20 PM   #43 
                             - "U.C. Davis Calls for Investigation After Pepper Spraying" (November 19, 2011)  ClarkUSA   Nov-19-11 10:03 PM   #44 
                                - That thug/criminal should be out of uniform  Hutzpa   Nov-19-11 10:08 PM   #45 
                                   - "Officers in pepper spray incident put on leave" (November 20, 2011)  ClarkUSA   Nov-20-11 05:45 PM   #56 
     - There is this difference:  Vattel   Nov-19-11 10:50 PM   #46 
     - Name the case law summary. What exact federal law has been broken by what exact incident?  ClarkUSA   Nov-20-11 10:37 AM   #49 
        - 42 USC 1983  rug   Nov-20-11 04:58 PM   #54 
        - So? WTF exactly has section 1983 got to do with Pres. Obama? All you've got is empty rhetoric.  ClarkUSA   Nov-20-11 06:49 PM   #58 
           - Everything. It's a violation of federal law to deprive a person of civil rights under color of law.  rug   Nov-20-11 07:06 PM   #59 
              - Then why isn't anyone else insisting this besides you? Hmm?  ClarkUSA   Nov-20-11 07:21 PM   #62 
                 - I must be the only one on the internets who thought of it.  rug   Nov-20-11 09:04 PM   #75 
                    - Gee, I wonder why?  ClarkUSA   Nov-20-11 09:18 PM   #79 
                       - Ok, let's discuss an 18 year old incident while the state attacks protestors on a live stream.  rug   Nov-20-11 09:33 PM   #81 
                          - Answer my questions re: Waco and Clinton's ATF. You've been avoiding it so far.  ClarkUSA   Nov-20-11 09:39 PM   #83 
                             - You brought up Waco. I'm glad you realize how ridiculous that is.  rug   Nov-20-11 09:40 PM   #85 
                                - You refuse to answer my questions re: Waco. What's ridiculous is your invocation of section 1983.  ClarkUSA   Nov-20-11 09:42 PM   #86 
                                   - 1983 applies directly to the police actions you whitewash.  rug   Nov-20-11 09:44 PM   #87 
                                      - That's false. Yet another strawman argument of a personal attack? Tsk tsk.  ClarkUSA   Nov-20-11 09:47 PM   #89 
                                         - Lol, sputtering cliches.  rug   Nov-20-11 09:50 PM   #92 
                                            - Oh, the irony.  ClarkUSA   Nov-20-11 09:53 PM   #94 
                                               - And the rolling smiley cliche is the perfect ending.  rug   Nov-20-11 09:57 PM   #95 
                                               - cliche = your constant litany of complaints since 2008 re: Pres. Obama what he does/doesn't do  ClarkUSA   Nov-20-11 09:59 PM   #97 
        - The US Constitution is federal (constitutional) law  Vattel   Nov-20-11 07:22 PM   #63 
           - So? The officers weren't feds. They were employees of UC Davis.  ClarkUSA   Nov-20-11 07:23 PM   #64 
              - Many violations of federal law are committed by persons who are not feds.  Vattel   Nov-20-11 08:37 PM   #70 
                 - Who has been charged with a federal crime in relation to OWS?  ClarkUSA   Nov-20-11 08:41 PM   #71 
                    - Violations of constitutional rights are not necessarily crimes.  Vattel   Nov-20-11 09:28 PM   #80 
                       - That doesn't make sense.  ClarkUSA   Nov-20-11 09:35 PM   #82 
                          - What doesn't make sense?  Vattel   Nov-20-11 09:45 PM   #88 
                             - It's empty rhetoric. I'm not interested in your subjective opinion re: what Pres. Obama should do.  ClarkUSA   Nov-20-11 09:49 PM   #91 
     - false equivalence  rapturedbyrobots   Nov-19-11 11:54 PM   #47 
     - Strawman argument.  ClarkUSA   Nov-20-11 10:14 AM   #48 
        - Apparently you've never heard of subtext or deep reading  rapturedbyrobots   Nov-20-11 02:03 PM   #50 
        - Trying to justify your lame strawman argument with more strawmen blathering? Yawn.  ClarkUSA   Nov-20-11 07:37 PM   #65 
        - It's not a strawman argument.  Chef Eric   Nov-20-11 09:51 PM   #93 
           - It was, indeed.  ClarkUSA   Nov-20-11 09:58 PM   #96 
              - You implied they were comparable by equally condemning the "wrongdoing" of both sides. nt  Chef Eric   Nov-20-11 10:14 PM   #101 
                 - Wrong again. Not interested in reading the subthread started with Reply #31, eh?  ClarkUSA   Nov-20-11 10:23 PM   #103 
                    - So you keep saying! But nobody else here seems to be convinced.  Chef Eric   Nov-20-11 10:31 PM   #110 
                       - Wrong. There are plenty of people who agree with me. This OP went to the Greatest Page.  ClarkUSA   Nov-20-11 10:37 PM   #118 
                          - Yes, I'm sure there are. They're just silent. nt  Chef Eric   Nov-20-11 10:42 PM   #122 
                             - Obama supporters make up a very large majority of the Democratic base. Get used to it.  ClarkUSA   Nov-20-11 10:48 PM   #125 
                                - That's great, but I was talking about DUers. I think you know that.  Chef Eric   Nov-20-11 10:53 PM   #127 
                                   - Your "talking about DUers" is subjective opinion, which is not of interest to me.  ClarkUSA   Nov-20-11 10:57 PM   #129 
     - I see you've used quote marks in your reference to police brutality.  Chef Eric   Nov-20-11 09:49 PM   #90 
        - Read through the subthread starting with Reply #31.  ClarkUSA   Nov-20-11 10:09 PM   #98 
           - O.K., so you were quoting somebody else.  Chef Eric   Nov-20-11 10:23 PM   #104 
              - You didn't read the subthread starting with Reply #31, did you?  ClarkUSA   Nov-20-11 10:27 PM   #106 
                 - I know, you must be very busy.  Chef Eric   Nov-20-11 10:33 PM   #113 
                    - This OP went to the Greatest Page, dear.  ClarkUSA   Nov-20-11 10:40 PM   #120 
                       - It belongs on the greatest page.  Chef Eric   Nov-20-11 10:49 PM   #126 
                          - Whenever Pres. Obama's actions debunks demonizing memes, I get attacked for posting it.  ClarkUSA   Nov-20-11 10:53 PM   #128 
  - But but this was said before the police started using pepper spray  Hutzpa   Nov-19-11 06:54 PM   #7 
  - See Reply #6.  ClarkUSA   Nov-19-11 07:03 PM   #8 
  - Did you notice he has been out of the counrty?  Nancy Waterman   Nov-19-11 07:59 PM   #24 
     - I sure did and also saw his photos at the Asia summit.  Hutzpa   Nov-19-11 08:24 PM   #35 
  - K&R  catgirl   Nov-19-11 07:52 PM   #22 
  - Great Mr. President!  boomerbust   Nov-20-11 03:51 PM   #52 
  - Saying he gets it isn't enough!  JNelson6563   Nov-20-11 04:45 PM   #53 
  - graph  Enrique   Nov-20-11 05:41 PM   #55 
  - "Obama: I'll fight to protect Wall Street reform"  ClarkUSA   Nov-20-11 06:48 PM   #57 
  - tip  Skittles   Nov-20-11 10:15 PM   #102 
     - I have. I'm not the one who mocks his list of achievements. You do that.  ClarkUSA   Nov-20-11 10:30 PM   #108 
        - no one says he has no achievements  Skittles   Nov-20-11 10:39 PM   #119 
           - You mock his singular successes. "If you" don't "think he has done the best he can do for us"...  ClarkUSA   Nov-20-11 10:42 PM   #121 
              - Deleted message  Name removed   Nov-20-11 10:46 PM   #124 
              - No, I'm an Obama supporter who rises above sneering jibes by his 24/7 critics.  ClarkUSA   Nov-20-11 10:58 PM   #130 
                 - riiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiight  Skittles   Nov-20-11 11:19 PM   #133 
              - WAKE UP !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!  Skittles   Nov-21-11 02:28 AM   #137 
  - Wow. Stunning graphic.  woo me with science   Nov-20-11 10:11 PM   #99 
     - Yes, the lack of a link to a source is remarkable.  ClarkUSA   Nov-20-11 10:32 PM   #111 
        - Oh, Clark....  woo me with science   Nov-20-11 10:36 PM   #117 
           - At least I link to sources, though some folks seem to have reading comprehension problems.  ClarkUSA   Nov-20-11 10:45 PM   #123 
              - ...  woo me with science   Nov-20-11 11:56 PM   #135 
  - There is no quotation at the link.  former9thward   Nov-20-11 07:15 PM   #60 
  - It's quite clear from the bolded text that I am quoting the author of the article.  ClarkUSA   Nov-20-11 07:17 PM   #61 
     - And the author quoted himself not Obama.  former9thward   Nov-20-11 07:42 PM   #66 
        - No, I quoted the author in my OP. What's your problem? It's a valid interpetation.  ClarkUSA   Nov-20-11 07:45 PM   #67 
           - It is not a valid interpretation at all.  former9thward   Nov-21-11 08:35 AM   #140 
  - What a "fierce advocate' HE'S turned out to be  MNBrewer   Nov-20-11 07:56 PM   #68 
  - Nothing President Obama says or does ever escapes your jeering, it seems.  ClarkUSA   Nov-20-11 08:24 PM   #69 
     - Make that "Nothing ClarkUSA ever posts" and I'll agree with you  MNBrewer   Nov-20-11 08:53 PM   #72 
        - I post facts about President Obama and will continue to do so. It beats demonizing him with lies.  ClarkUSA   Nov-20-11 08:55 PM   #73 
           - LOL  MNBrewer   Nov-20-11 08:59 PM   #74 
              - Thanks for kicking my OP!  ClarkUSA   Nov-20-11 09:10 PM   #77 
  - Apparently he's been "paying close attention" via Homeland Security...  ClassWarrior   Nov-20-11 09:10 PM   #76 
  - From your own source: "The White House says theres no federal oversight."  ClarkUSA   Nov-20-11 09:16 PM   #78 
  - Too bad that the DU ODSers proclaim that Obama=Bush. It's patently ridiculous! K&R!!!!  Liberal_Stalwart71   Nov-20-11 09:40 PM   #84 
  - pretty wishy-washy stuff  Skittles   Nov-20-11 10:14 PM   #100 
  - Not only wishy-washy, but also not a quote from Obama,  woo me with science   Nov-20-11 10:30 PM   #109 
  - OH TEH OUTRAGE!!!  ClarkUSA   Nov-20-11 10:36 PM   #116 
  - As if anything he says or does ever satisfies you.  ClarkUSA   Nov-20-11 10:33 PM   #114 
     - It's really terrible  woo me with science   Nov-20-11 11:45 PM   #134 
  - THAT IS NOT A QUOTE FROM OBAMA.  woo me with science   Nov-20-11 10:25 PM   #105 
  - I DID NOT SAY IT WAS.  ClarkUSA   Nov-20-11 10:28 PM   #107 
     - "Pres. Obama said he 'sympathizes with protesters' broad grievances;"  woo me with science   Nov-20-11 10:32 PM   #112 
        - Go complain to the author of the article. His interpretation is valid. Your hairsplitting is boring  ClarkUSA   Nov-20-11 10:35 PM   #115 
           - No, what's getting tiresome here is a pattern in which source material does not reflect  woo me with science   Nov-20-11 11:06 PM   #131 
              - Yawn.  ClarkUSA   Nov-20-11 11:06 PM   #132 
  - That's called attempting to co-opt the language of the movement.  woo me with science   Nov-21-11 12:49 AM   #136 
  - maybe if the protesters' "broad grievances" include that banks get prosecuted TOO MUCH  Enrique   Nov-21-11 06:25 AM   #138 

Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators

Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC