You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #23: Corporate news thanks all for taking the bait of their hypothetical manderings [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU
FrenchieCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-15-11 12:55 PM
Response to Reply #20
23. Corporate news thanks all for taking the bait of their hypothetical manderings
based on connecting some of what Obama has said (stuff that he's been saying,
even before there was ever any OWS movement) to conclude to the headline's
convenient finding based on the fact that Obama has had supportive things to say
about this movement (and apparently he's damned if he does, and he would be damned if he didn't).

That's is what is sorry; folks willing to jump on a bandwagon set up by the corporate media in their normal attempts to divide us in order to encourage us to take pot shots at this President...

Here's the point....

Simply put, the Occupy Wall Street Movement is Americans’ individual calls of shame on corporate greed, but done collectively. It represents the frustrations of millions of Americans who did everything right, but have been forced to realize that their hard work no longer brings with it the promised spoils of the American Dream. It is the father whose job was shipped to China while he watched a padlock put on his castle, now only one among millions of foreclosed houses. It is the teacher who dreamed of working on his long-yearned-for though ill-paid passion, only to be demonized and given a pink slip. It is the tale of a young college graduate who sacrificed to attain a degree and, saddled with massive student loans, is unable to find work in her chosen field, or perhaps any work at all. It is the young war veterans coming back to barely nothing. Or the owners of small businesses whose efforts were nullified for not being able to secure credit to weather the current business downturn. These and others scenarios are the diverse tales of 99% of us, those who aspire to achieve and yet have been let down at every crossroads.

Interestingly, there are various diverging interest groups who seek to mold this burgeoning movement into their own image....
<>
We should resist corporate media’s attempts to define for us what this movement is about, or even which political force it may help. The media would like nothing more than to be in full control of this phenomenon, and they won’t stop trying any time soon. Furthermore, although most of us are the 99%, even that doesn’t mean that, as individuals, we’ll get to dictate where this movement goes or what it will do. What’s reassuring is that it appears that the values of the OWS movement are based on a common goal of making the nation better at managing the collective general welfare. In other words, it is a protest movement which generally demands the betterment of this country, and that is what may make the difference; it is urging us to move toward something good for Americans… or at least for 99% of us.
http://www.democratsforprogress.com/2011/10/10/projecti... /




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
  -Obama plans to turn anti-Wall Street anger on Mitt Romney, Republicans polichick  Oct-15-11 10:04 AM   #0 
  - Late is better than never. Fire Bill Daley. nt  geek tragedy   Oct-15-11 10:07 AM   #1 
  - I heard he's leaving AFTER the election - sooner would be better...  polichick   Oct-15-11 10:08 AM   #2 
     - He has to get comfortable shoes too....  izquierdista   Oct-15-11 10:21 AM   #5 
        - Good point - I am very interested in how he's going to pull this off...  polichick   Oct-15-11 10:25 AM   #8 
  - Could it be, this writer for WAPO does not want the Democrats  OHdem10   Oct-15-11 10:10 AM   #3 
  - You're shooting the messenger - try discussing the facts...  polichick   Oct-15-11 10:12 AM   #4 
  - Let us hope that the anti Wall Street demostrators  randr   Oct-15-11 10:22 AM   #6 
  - It's my hope too - I think OWS is the best kind of "primary."  polichick   Oct-15-11 10:23 AM   #7 
  - Good way to put it.  woo me with science   Oct-15-11 07:49 PM   #57 
  - Yes we can! Not Yes he can!  ellisonz   Oct-15-11 10:24 PM   #60 
  - Let them own it ,it's their meal ticket.  orpupilofnature57   Oct-15-11 10:34 AM   #9 
  - Who? Republicans, the Obama admin., or both?  polichick   Oct-15-11 10:35 AM   #10 
  - Republican Candidates  orpupilofnature57   Oct-15-11 10:42 AM   #11 
     - Funny how Romney is already tweaking his response to the protests...  polichick   Oct-15-11 11:07 AM   #14 
        - Thats their trick, confusing who's who and what's what.  orpupilofnature57   Oct-15-11 11:41 AM   #17 
           - True - amazing how easy it is to do!  polichick   Oct-15-11 01:37 PM   #32 
  - And Tim could run the operation. Oh, wait! Get the Bernank too!  Safetykitten   Oct-15-11 10:44 AM   #12 
  - Yeah, it's going to be a bit tricky to draw distinctions given the current staff...  polichick   Oct-15-11 10:50 AM   #13 
  - LOL. Great minds think alike!  woo me with science   Oct-15-11 07:52 PM   #58 
  - He Should Have Told John Hickenlooper  otohara   Oct-15-11 11:22 AM   #15 
  - Time for the people to fire Hickenlooper!  polichick   Oct-15-11 11:24 AM   #16 
  - Why do you have quotes around the excerpts you've posted? They are not quotes.  AtomicKitten   Oct-15-11 11:55 AM   #18 
  - Its appropriate MLA formatting, for a few lines of excerpted text  bhikkhu   Oct-15-11 04:50 PM   #55 
     - good to know - thanks for the info /nt  AtomicKitten   Oct-16-11 12:19 AM   #62 
  - He's standing a little too close to Wall Street for that to be a winning strategy for him  MNBrewer   Oct-15-11 11:57 AM   #19 
  - Yeah, it will be interesting to see how they go about it.  polichick   Oct-15-11 01:39 PM   #33 
  - The Obama administration better be careful lest the OWS hands them their asses  lunatica   Oct-15-11 12:34 PM   #20 
  - Corporate news thanks all for taking the bait of their hypothetical manderings  FrenchieCat   Oct-15-11 12:55 PM   #23 
  - I've always supported Obama, but not in every single thing. You're barking up the wrong tree  lunatica   Oct-15-11 02:12 PM   #42 
     - I don't see the Obama campaign using the Movement.....  FrenchieCat   Oct-15-11 02:17 PM   #45 
        - I truly hope you're right.  lunatica   Oct-15-11 02:29 PM   #48 
           - Thanks......  FrenchieCat   Oct-15-11 02:35 PM   #50 
  - He castigated purists and Rahm called an idea "retarded". A supporter does not spread lies.  great white snark   Oct-15-11 01:11 PM   #25 
     - So you substitute the word purist for progressive. Interesting lie just to call me a liar  lunatica   Oct-15-11 02:10 PM   #40 
     - There you go!  Puglover   Oct-16-11 08:01 AM   #65 
  - Screw Obama. As soon as he taints it, the Republicans  Marnie   Oct-15-11 12:34 PM   #21 
  - No. Or haven't you noticed how impotent their 'framing' has become  lunatica   Oct-15-11 12:39 PM   #22 
  - OWS is not a reelection strategy.  rug   Oct-15-11 12:57 PM   #24 
  - You respond as though there is evidence that Obama or anyone in his admin  FrenchieCat   Oct-15-11 01:16 PM   #26 
  - Will Plouffe do?  rug   Oct-15-11 01:18 PM   #27 
     - The contrast of the two parties, not OWS.  great white snark   Oct-15-11 01:22 PM   #28 
     - Why shouldn't the issues that the OWS are out there taking a stance on  FrenchieCat   Oct-15-11 01:22 PM   #29 
        - The question is which dominates.  rug   Oct-15-11 01:35 PM   #31 
           - I don't think you get it.  FrenchieCat   Oct-15-11 01:46 PM   #35 
              - You don't get it. It's not about Obama at all.  rug   Oct-15-11 02:03 PM   #39 
                 - No. I've got that part......  FrenchieCat   Oct-15-11 02:14 PM   #43 
  - What?  Hutzpa   Oct-15-11 01:34 PM   #30 
  - this photo will help  Enrique   Oct-15-11 01:44 PM   #34 
  - Yes, but there are plenty of photos with the prez with his Goldman Sachs administration too...  polichick   Oct-15-11 01:46 PM   #36 
     - Are both party equal on that?  FrenchieCat   Oct-15-11 01:52 PM   #37 
     - Both parties are beholden to corporate interests, yes - otherwise we...  polichick   Oct-15-11 02:15 PM   #44 
     - yeah, but it's not the same  Enrique   Oct-15-11 02:12 PM   #41 
        - Too bad that's not the only one...  polichick   Oct-15-11 02:23 PM   #46 
  - The ink isn't even dry on the "free trade" deals he signed  SHRED   Oct-15-11 01:59 PM   #38 
  - OWS won't fall for this political charade  SHRED   Oct-15-11 02:24 PM   #47 
  - I know what you mean. Still, it's likely most will vote. I wonder though...  polichick   Oct-15-11 02:33 PM   #49 
     - She'd like for you to occupy the voting booth regardless.....  FrenchieCat   Oct-15-11 02:37 PM   #51 
        - If you think the 99% shouldn't make demands of our pols, you're crazy!  polichick   Oct-15-11 02:41 PM   #52 
           - That's not what I'm saying......  FrenchieCat   Oct-15-11 02:47 PM   #53 
              - Those are facts about conditions but they're not demands - yet.  polichick   Oct-15-11 04:32 PM   #54 
  - I'm not sure if this strategy will work or not. Many OWS protesters have a pox on both of your  totodeinhere   Oct-15-11 07:40 PM   #56 
  - I think this may backfire.  NorthCarolina   Oct-15-11 08:01 PM   #59 
  - No one is co-opting shit! Other than you co-opting that piece of shit of an article!  FrenchieCat   Oct-16-11 12:15 AM   #61 
     - Did you  NorthCarolina   Oct-16-11 09:21 AM   #67 
  - HAHAHAHA! That's a bit like Nixon using Vietnam protestors against his rivals  LittleBlue   Oct-16-11 01:05 AM   #63 
  - Yes, and he's going to fire the bulk of his Cabinet to accomplish just that.  Umbral   Oct-16-11 01:19 AM   #64 
  - He needs to fire Immelt and Geithner for starters and...  SHRED   Oct-16-11 09:19 AM   #66 
 

Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC