michreject
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Oct-15-11 06:42 AM
Response to Original message |
| 19. He's a sitting President who is eligible for re election. |
|
It should be his decision.
|
| -"Would you like the Democratic Party to nominate Barack Obama again in 2012" |
ProSense |
Oct-13-11 09:50 AM |
#0 |
-
Absolutely and without question; |
Cigar11 |
Oct-13-11 09:54 AM |
#1 |
-
The non-stop wall; to wall media/GOP circus has people tired of their side show |
liberal N proud |
Oct-13-11 09:55 AM |
#2 |
 -
Ah yes, the old "Who else you gonna vote for" line....so.....inspiring.... |
truebrit71 |
Oct-13-11 03:06 PM |
#15 |
-
Those numbers don't sound so good |
Proud Liberal Dem |
Oct-13-11 10:02 AM |
#3 |
-
So Clinton was about the same, but slightly less welcome than |
Bluenorthwest |
Oct-13-11 10:02 AM |
#4 |
 -
Actually, |
ProSense |
Oct-13-11 10:06 AM |
#6 |
-
And yet Obama is stronger now than Clinton was then |
Bluenorthwest |
Oct-13-11 10:19 AM |
#9 |
-
Not only was the claim wrong |
ProSense |
Oct-13-11 10:23 AM |
#10 |
-
"So gee, maybe being more criticized leads to more popularity?" |
Denzil_DC |
Oct-13-11 10:26 AM |
#11 |
-
I can't open the link where I am, what percentage said yes? |
WI_DEM |
Oct-13-11 10:04 AM |
#5 |
 -
All Democrats - 73 percent; primary voters - 78 percent. In other words |
ProSense |
Oct-13-11 10:09 AM |
#7 |
-
Yes, that is actually better than Clinton had in 1996 and he didn't get any opposition. |
WI_DEM |
Oct-13-11 10:18 AM |
#8 |
-
Sort of late to do anything else - got to get out the vote now... |
polichick |
Oct-13-11 10:40 AM |
#12 |
-
K&R |
JTFrog |
Oct-13-11 10:46 AM |
#13 |
-
No - he's a republican when judged by his actions |
slay |
Oct-13-11 03:04 PM |
#14 |
 -
So we count you with the 20%, right? You do know that 78% is greater than 20%, right? |
Tarheel_Dem |
Oct-13-11 04:09 PM |
#16 |
  -
There is nothing wrong with being a part of a principled minority. How many times in our history |
totodeinhere |
Oct-15-11 09:25 PM |
#44 |
 -
Even though you stole my line, I can't help but be in fervent agreement |
Vidar |
Oct-15-11 05:27 AM |
#18 |
 -
What a pathetic spot we are in. |
woo me with science |
Oct-15-11 08:47 AM |
#20 |
  -
I take it you are one of the judges of who are part of the pure and true democratic party? n/t |
Bodhi BloodWave |
Oct-15-11 09:46 AM |
#21 |
   -
LOL. And I take it you support any set of policies as long as there is a (D) after the name? |
woo me with science |
Oct-15-11 10:19 AM |
#22 |
  -
Considering i live in norway the answer to that would be in the negative :) nt |
Bodhi BloodWave |
Oct-15-11 02:12 PM |
#25 |
  -
Then why on earth are you defending this crap to us? |
woo me with science |
Oct-15-11 02:16 PM |
#26 |
  -
likely cause i strongly disagree with your label of the democratic party |
Bodhi BloodWave |
Oct-15-11 03:04 PM |
#31 |
  -
The Democratic Party in the US desperately needs saving |
woo me with science |
Oct-15-11 03:19 PM |
#32 |
  -
Saving? Trust me, it won't be by the 20%. Bet on it! |
Tarheel_Dem |
Oct-15-11 03:30 PM |
#33 |
  -
"Use the GOP's infrastructure to affect the change you want, and good luck with that." |
woo me with science |
Oct-15-11 03:38 PM |
#34 |
  -
I wouldn't click on one of your links for all the tea in China. |
Tarheel_Dem |
Oct-15-11 04:25 PM |
#36 |
  -
Of course you wouldn't. |
woo me with science |
Oct-15-11 05:07 PM |
#38 |
  -
I applaud the 99%. They should do what they feel they need to. |
Tarheel_Dem |
Oct-16-11 03:10 PM |
#51 |
  -
there's something here that's pathetic. |
dionysus |
Oct-15-11 11:16 PM |
#49 |
 -
Try finding a real Republican and listening to them for five minutes |
treestar |
Oct-15-11 10:23 AM |
#23 |
 -
put the lighter down, and slowly walk away from the bong. i think you're smoking seeds... |
dionysus |
Oct-15-11 10:02 PM |
#48 |
-
K&R |
Number23 |
Oct-14-11 01:26 AM |
#17 |
-
He's a sitting President who is eligible for re election. |
michreject |
Oct-15-11 06:42 AM |
#19 |
-
No. |
Safetykitten |
Oct-15-11 10:47 AM |
#24 |
 -
Awww. There. There. Too bad. You're in the 20%. |
Tarheel_Dem |
Oct-15-11 02:26 PM |
#27 |
 -
So hopefully you're doing more than sitting here lobbing negative cyberbombs. |
CakeGrrl |
Oct-15-11 02:30 PM |
#28 |
-
I wouldn't count on it. Afterall, keyboard commando-ism is much less taxing. |
Tarheel_Dem |
Oct-15-11 02:48 PM |
#30 |
-
Count me as one who says hell yes. |
lunatica |
Oct-15-11 02:31 PM |
#29 |
-
Put me down for a "yes". |
JNelson6563 |
Oct-15-11 04:13 PM |
#35 |
-
And yet there are jesters on this site |
Hutzpa |
Oct-15-11 04:26 PM |
#37 |
 -
whatever you do, don't refer to them as GOP agitators |
Capn Sunshine |
Oct-15-11 05:09 PM |
#39 |
  -
Especially... |
Bobbie Jo |
Oct-15-11 06:48 PM |
#41 |
 -
If the GOP is paying people to donate to DU so they can agitate and appear to be legitimate, |
totodeinhere |
Oct-15-11 09:29 PM |
#45 |
 -
My star expired today... |
Bobbie Jo |
Oct-15-11 09:50 PM |
#46 |
 -
it is Clinton's policies and capitulation to the greed of corporate America that continue |
TheKentuckian |
Oct-15-11 05:24 PM |
#40 |
-
False analogy. |
Beacool |
Oct-15-11 08:26 PM |
#42 |
 -
and hopefully we'll see less of the posters that want Obama to sink. |
Capn Sunshine |
Oct-15-11 09:02 PM |
#43 |
-
Would depend on who that "someone else" is. |
Skip Intro |
Oct-15-11 10:01 PM |
#47 |
-
No, it really wouldn't. Obama's our candidate. |
MjolnirTime |
Oct-16-11 07:09 AM |
#50 |