You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #19: He's a sitting President who is eligible for re election. [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU
michreject Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-15-11 06:42 AM
Response to Original message
19. He's a sitting President who is eligible for re election.


It should be his decision.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
  -"Would you like the Democratic Party to nominate Barack Obama again in 2012" ProSense  Oct-13-11 09:50 AM   #0 
  - Absolutely and without question;  Cigar11   Oct-13-11 09:54 AM   #1 
  - The non-stop wall; to wall media/GOP circus has people tired of their side show  liberal N proud   Oct-13-11 09:55 AM   #2 
  - Ah yes, the old "Who else you gonna vote for" line....so.....inspiring....  truebrit71   Oct-13-11 03:06 PM   #15 
  - Those numbers don't sound so good  Proud Liberal Dem   Oct-13-11 10:02 AM   #3 
  - So Clinton was about the same, but slightly less welcome than  Bluenorthwest   Oct-13-11 10:02 AM   #4 
  - Actually,  ProSense   Oct-13-11 10:06 AM   #6 
     - And yet Obama is stronger now than Clinton was then  Bluenorthwest   Oct-13-11 10:19 AM   #9 
        - Not only was the claim wrong  ProSense   Oct-13-11 10:23 AM   #10 
        - "So gee, maybe being more criticized leads to more popularity?"  Denzil_DC   Oct-13-11 10:26 AM   #11 
  - I can't open the link where I am, what percentage said yes?  WI_DEM   Oct-13-11 10:04 AM   #5 
  - All Democrats - 73 percent; primary voters - 78 percent. In other words  ProSense   Oct-13-11 10:09 AM   #7 
     - Yes, that is actually better than Clinton had in 1996 and he didn't get any opposition.  WI_DEM   Oct-13-11 10:18 AM   #8 
  - Sort of late to do anything else - got to get out the vote now...  polichick   Oct-13-11 10:40 AM   #12 
  - K&R  JTFrog   Oct-13-11 10:46 AM   #13 
  - No - he's a republican when judged by his actions  slay   Oct-13-11 03:04 PM   #14 
  - So we count you with the 20%, right? You do know that 78% is greater than 20%, right?  Tarheel_Dem   Oct-13-11 04:09 PM   #16 
  - There is nothing wrong with being a part of a principled minority. How many times in our history  totodeinhere   Oct-15-11 09:25 PM   #44 
  - Even though you stole my line, I can't help but be in fervent agreement  Vidar   Oct-15-11 05:27 AM   #18 
  - What a pathetic spot we are in.  woo me with science   Oct-15-11 08:47 AM   #20 
  - I take it you are one of the judges of who are part of the pure and true democratic party? n/t  Bodhi BloodWave   Oct-15-11 09:46 AM   #21 
  - LOL. And I take it you support any set of policies as long as there is a (D) after the name?  woo me with science   Oct-15-11 10:19 AM   #22 
     - Considering i live in norway the answer to that would be in the negative :) nt  Bodhi BloodWave   Oct-15-11 02:12 PM   #25 
        - Then why on earth are you defending this crap to us?  woo me with science   Oct-15-11 02:16 PM   #26 
           - likely cause i strongly disagree with your label of the democratic party  Bodhi BloodWave   Oct-15-11 03:04 PM   #31 
              - The Democratic Party in the US desperately needs saving  woo me with science   Oct-15-11 03:19 PM   #32 
                 - Saving? Trust me, it won't be by the 20%. Bet on it!  Tarheel_Dem   Oct-15-11 03:30 PM   #33 
                    - "Use the GOP's infrastructure to affect the change you want, and good luck with that."  woo me with science   Oct-15-11 03:38 PM   #34 
                       - I wouldn't click on one of your links for all the tea in China.  Tarheel_Dem   Oct-15-11 04:25 PM   #36 
                          - Of course you wouldn't.  woo me with science   Oct-15-11 05:07 PM   #38 
                             - I applaud the 99%. They should do what they feel they need to.  Tarheel_Dem   Oct-16-11 03:10 PM   #51 
  - there's something here that's pathetic.  dionysus   Oct-15-11 11:16 PM   #49 
  - Try finding a real Republican and listening to them for five minutes  treestar   Oct-15-11 10:23 AM   #23 
  - put the lighter down, and slowly walk away from the bong. i think you're smoking seeds...  dionysus   Oct-15-11 10:02 PM   #48 
  - K&R  Number23   Oct-14-11 01:26 AM   #17 
  - He's a sitting President who is eligible for re election.  michreject   Oct-15-11 06:42 AM   #19 
  - No.  Safetykitten   Oct-15-11 10:47 AM   #24 
  - Awww. There. There. Too bad. You're in the 20%.  Tarheel_Dem   Oct-15-11 02:26 PM   #27 
  - So hopefully you're doing more than sitting here lobbing negative cyberbombs.  CakeGrrl   Oct-15-11 02:30 PM   #28 
     - I wouldn't count on it. Afterall, keyboard commando-ism is much less taxing.  Tarheel_Dem   Oct-15-11 02:48 PM   #30 
  - Count me as one who says hell yes.  lunatica   Oct-15-11 02:31 PM   #29 
  - Put me down for a "yes".  JNelson6563   Oct-15-11 04:13 PM   #35 
  - And yet there are jesters on this site  Hutzpa   Oct-15-11 04:26 PM   #37 
  - whatever you do, don't refer to them as GOP agitators  Capn Sunshine   Oct-15-11 05:09 PM   #39 
  - Especially...  Bobbie Jo   Oct-15-11 06:48 PM   #41 
     - If the GOP is paying people to donate to DU so they can agitate and appear to be legitimate,  totodeinhere   Oct-15-11 09:29 PM   #45 
        - My star expired today...  Bobbie Jo   Oct-15-11 09:50 PM   #46 
  - it is Clinton's policies and capitulation to the greed of corporate America that continue  TheKentuckian   Oct-15-11 05:24 PM   #40 
  - False analogy.  Beacool   Oct-15-11 08:26 PM   #42 
  - and hopefully we'll see less of the posters that want Obama to sink.  Capn Sunshine   Oct-15-11 09:02 PM   #43 
  - Would depend on who that "someone else" is.  Skip Intro   Oct-15-11 10:01 PM   #47 
     - No, it really wouldn't. Obama's our candidate.  MjolnirTime   Oct-16-11 07:09 AM   #50 
 

Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC