You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #5: Well said. Not like one can organize a write-in campaign for V.P. in the Primary. [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread		 This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU
Kennah Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-02-11 10:50 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. Well said. Not like one can organize a write-in campaign for V.P. in the Primary.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
  -Hillary for VP? SunDrop23  Sep-02-11 10:36 PM   #0 
  - Dumb, dumb, dumb. Why do people want to push Joe aside?  CakeGrrl   Sep-02-11 10:38 PM   #1 
  - Clinton no way -Look at the pipline she is backing & read her words from 2010  lunasun   Sep-02-11 11:14 PM   #8 
     - Guaranteed loss if Hillary is on the ticket.  InAbLuEsTaTe   Sep-03-11 10:53 PM   #57 
  - I recall that she has already said she doesn't want to run  The Velveteen Ocelot   Sep-02-11 10:40 PM   #2 
  - Where do we get her run..??? We don't run anyone...she is retiring..  Historic NY   Sep-02-11 10:43 PM   #3 
  - Well said. Not like one can organize a write-in campaign for V.P. in the Primary.  Kennah   Sep-02-11 10:50 PM   #5 
  - Thankfully.  InAbLuEsTaTe   Sep-03-11 10:51 PM   #56 
  - President Obam has already asked Joe to run with him, and Joe said yes.  Tx4obama   Sep-02-11 10:50 PM   #4 
  - it's not biden we need to replace......  bowens43   Sep-02-11 11:05 PM   #6 
  - Have you hard the talk about Howard Schultz? Interesting. NT  juajen   Sep-02-11 11:11 PM   #7 
  - So says you, but thank goodness you don't make decisions for the rest of us.  Tarheel_Dem   Sep-02-11 11:54 PM   #9 
     - Hillary is a WAR HAWK she was in favor of the 30,000 troop increase in Afghanistan  bigdarryl   Sep-03-11 05:07 AM   #10 
        - Actually, Hillary wanted an 80,000 troop increase for 10+ yrs. along with Gen. McCrystal.  ClarkUSA   Sep-03-11 09:28 AM   #17 
           - DAMN!!! see what I mean  bigdarryl   Sep-03-11 09:31 AM   #19 
           - Exactly why we don't need Hillary the warmonger. She can't retire soon enough!  InAbLuEsTaTe   Sep-03-11 10:55 PM   #59 
  - She doesn't need to run, Obama enacted all her policies. n/t  Exilednight   Sep-03-11 05:34 AM   #11 
  - Wrong. See Reply #10 and #17. Pres. Obama also rejected her wishes re: Afghanistan troop drawdown.  ClarkUSA   Sep-03-11 09:29 AM   #18 
     - HCR, FinReg and almost any other domestic policy is Hillary's. After the primaries, Obama replaced  Exilednight   Sep-03-11 12:11 PM   #23 
        - That is ridiculous, given her failure to win the primary, much less pass HCR in the 90's.  ClarkUSA   Sep-03-11 01:05 PM   #26 
           - Who campaigned on mandates? Who enacted mandates? n/t  Exilednight   Sep-03-11 01:38 PM   #28 
           - Mitt Romney (after his Democratic legislature wrote the legislation)  ClarkUSA   Sep-03-11 04:43 PM   #30 
              - I'm talking about in the Democratic primary. n/t  Exilednight   Sep-03-11 04:57 PM   #32 
                 - So what? Who got it passed? The idea of a mandate didn't start with Hillary.  ClarkUSA   Sep-03-11 05:02 PM   #34 
                    - And Obama's final bill was patterned after Hillary Care. And the point is simple  Exilednight   Sep-03-11 05:05 PM   #35 
                       - Prove your claims. Edwards' plan had a mandate, too, but one aspect does not a pattern make.  ClarkUSA   Sep-03-11 05:09 PM   #36 
                          - Alright, this is simple  Exilednight   Sep-03-11 05:55 PM   #37 
                             - That's more ridiculous rhetoric without a shred of legislative proof that backs your claim.  ClarkUSA   Sep-03-11 07:00 PM   #39 
                                - Policies and actions are more than legislative. Keep backpedaling. n/t  Exilednight   Sep-03-11 07:31 PM   #40 
                                   - LOL! Your rhetoric is as empty as your logic.  ClarkUSA   Sep-03-11 07:34 PM   #41 
                                      - You can't legislate meeting with world leaders. You getting calf cramps yet:? n/t  Exilednight   Sep-03-11 07:36 PM   #42 
                                         - Moving the goalpost? How predictable.  ClarkUSA   Sep-03-11 07:45 PM   #43 
                                            - Not at all. I stated that Obama enacted her policies. Your calfs must be bulging by now. n/t  Exilednight   Sep-03-11 07:47 PM   #44 
                                               - Prove it. You have yet to prove even one of your rhetorical claims.  ClarkUSA   Sep-03-11 07:59 PM   #45 
                                                  - Has Obama offered to openly meet with leader of Iran or North Korea, or did he send  Exilednight   Sep-03-11 08:01 PM   #46 
                                                  - Prove your claim that "HCR, FinReg and almost any other domestic policy is Hillary's."  ClarkUSA   Sep-03-11 09:02 PM   #47 
                                                  - Try reading Krugman's op-eds. He lays out a pretty convincing argument and  Exilednight   Sep-03-11 09:10 PM   #48 
                                                  - So you have zero proof. And now you're passing the buck to an op-ed PUMA?  ClarkUSA   Sep-03-11 09:18 PM   #49 
                                                  - Krugman's a PUMA? The guy can't stand Hillary, so I don't know you consider him a PUMA. But  Exilednight   Sep-03-11 09:22 PM   #50 
                                                  - Yup. And you have yet to prove your claim with anything approaching facts.  ClarkUSA   Sep-03-11 09:27 PM   #51 
                                                  - Alright, let me break this down for you: Fact 1. Obama campaigned against mandates.  Exilednight   Sep-03-11 09:30 PM   #52 
                                                  - MA Dem legislature created RomneyCare, which had a mandate, so it wasn't Hillary's brainchild.  ClarkUSA   Sep-03-11 09:32 PM   #53 
                                                  - Are any of the facts I posted wrong? Yes or no?  Exilednight   Sep-03-11 09:33 PM   #54 
                                                  - Prove your claim that "HCR, FinReg and almost any other domestic policy is Hillary's."  ClarkUSA   Sep-03-11 09:49 PM   #55 
                                                  - Are the facts I posted in post #52 wrong? Yes or No?  Exilednight   Sep-04-11 05:46 AM   #62 
                                                  - Some folks are colorblind  Mr Deltoid   Sep-04-11 11:22 AM   #64 
           - Nonsense, Hillary did not lose the primary. The super delegates handed it over to Obama.  Beacool   Sep-04-11 01:53 PM   #65 
  - why?  ibegurpard   Sep-03-11 05:46 AM   #12 
  - Why? I probably would be less supportive of Obama without Biden on the ticket.  Mass   Sep-03-11 08:14 AM   #13 
  - Me too.  Jennicut   Sep-03-11 10:55 PM   #58 
  - I Fail To See How It Would Make A Difference  DemocratSinceBirth   Sep-03-11 08:46 AM   #14 
  - Why? What purpose would that serve? nt  Honeycombe8   Sep-03-11 09:12 AM   #15 
  - Is That A Rhetorical Question?  DemocratSinceBirth   Sep-03-11 09:14 AM   #16 
     - No, it wasn't. The OP perplexed me. Why would anyone think that would be a good idea...  Honeycombe8   Sep-04-11 10:27 AM   #63 
  - Why? So she can convince him to build up troops again in Afghanistan and approve the oil pipeline?  TwilightGardener   Sep-03-11 09:33 AM   #20 
  - No. We already have an excellent VP.  Phx_Dem   Sep-03-11 10:36 AM   #21 
  - Obama would lose more votes than he would gain.  InAbLuEsTaTe   Sep-03-11 10:59 PM   #60 
  - how about Virg Bernero?  quitnesset   Sep-03-11 10:45 AM   #22 
  - I loved Virg, too. Problem is,  PassingFair   Sep-03-11 12:12 PM   #24 
  - No more Clintons for *anything*.  Ikonoklast   Sep-03-11 12:36 PM   #25 
  - Bill screwed this country more than his interns. Hillary as VP would only wreak more havoc.  InAbLuEsTaTe   Sep-03-11 11:05 PM   #61 
  - The problem is not the VP.  Beacool   Sep-03-11 01:34 PM   #27 
  - I guess it was time for this idea to be recycled.  treestar   Sep-03-11 01:42 PM   #29 
  - More of the same DLC stupidity. No thanks. At least Joe sometimes thinks for himself.  Fearless   Sep-03-11 04:47 PM   #31 
  - 6 of one, half a dozen of another:  blkmusclmachine   Sep-03-11 05:01 PM   #33 
  - No (nt)  bigwillq   Sep-03-11 06:13 PM   #38 
 

Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators

Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC