You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #35: Barely [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU
Juche Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-30-11 07:49 PM
Response to Reply #32
35. Barely
He barely won the popular vote in Florida, and had the recount gone on as it was supposed to he would've won 2000 with only one state. I don't know how true to fact that review is, but it implied that a Gore victory should've been overwhelming, not a squeaker by a few thousand votes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
  -Never-fail prediction system shows 2012 win for Obama Playinghardball  Aug-30-11 10:45 AM   #0 
  - I think Obama will win, too. Perry, Bachmann, Romney, Paul? Please.  No Elephants   Aug-30-11 10:48 AM   #1 
  - One reason they think Obama will win is because he is NOT getting primaried.  Pirate Smile   Aug-30-11 10:51 AM   #2 
     - Another example of "an inconvenient truth"  Rowdyboy   Aug-30-11 10:54 AM   #3 
     - Delete. Misunderstanding  Maraya1969   Aug-30-11 10:58 AM   #4 
     - I did not see that in the article. Where are you getting that information from? nt  ZombieHorde   Aug-30-11 11:11 AM   #6 
        - I read an article on his keys last week and that was mentioned in it. Let me look for it.  Pirate Smile   Aug-30-11 11:31 AM   #11 
        - Here you go - I posted it last week:"whether the president faces a serious challenge in the primary"  Pirate Smile   Aug-30-11 11:36 AM   #14 
           - Thank you. Perhaps a "non-serious" primary challenger would be good.  ZombieHorde   Aug-30-11 11:45 AM   #16 
              - A serious challenger results in a lose for the incumbent, not a win for the challenger  mkultra   Aug-31-11 12:30 PM   #39 
                 - That may be, but people often claim Kucinich is not a serious challenger  ZombieHorde   Aug-31-11 03:44 PM   #42 
                    - I would agree that he is not and would not be concerned with a primary from him  mkultra   Sep-01-11 10:49 AM   #45 
  - How did the formula do on the other 49 presidential elections?  MilesColtrane   Aug-30-11 11:08 AM   #5 
  - Did you miss the 3 decade long winning streak part? I guess we should invent a time machine just to  DFab420   Aug-30-11 04:24 PM   #31 
  - He must of been lucky w/2000 election.  windowpilot   Aug-30-11 11:15 AM   #7 
  - No. He didn't get lucky. His system predicts the popular vote winner and he predicted Gore in 2000.  phleshdef   Aug-30-11 01:05 PM   #21 
  - this is actually good news...  Steerpike   Aug-30-11 11:18 AM   #8 
  - K & R  Scurrilous   Aug-30-11 11:24 AM   #9 
  - The Keys  Yukari Yakumo   Aug-30-11 11:27 AM   #10 
  - 13 is going to be a big fat false  treestar   Aug-30-11 11:37 AM   #15 
  - How does he know the answers to 2, 4, 8, or 9?  Ter   Aug-30-11 02:14 PM   #28 
  - Did he predict the stolen 2000 and 2004 elections with this system?  McCamy Taylor   Aug-30-11 11:31 AM   #12 
  - His system only predicts the popular vote  denem   Aug-30-11 12:24 PM   #18 
     - Gore won the popular vote as Lichtman predicted he doesn't predict electoral collage votes  bigdarryl   Aug-30-11 01:05 PM   #20 
  - The future is sometimes unlike the past? nt  bemildred   Aug-30-11 11:33 AM   #13 
  - "Using the keys, it is hard to envision a scenario other than a Gore victory in November"  denem   Aug-30-11 12:19 PM   #17 
  - Funny thing is...Gore won man...Gore won  DFab420   Aug-30-11 04:26 PM   #32 
     - Barely  Juche   Aug-30-11 07:49 PM   #35 
  - The Last President To Be Re- Elected With An Unemployment Level > 7.2% Was FDR  DemocratSinceBirth   Aug-30-11 12:39 PM   #19 
  - these unemployment numbers dont mean anything his system doesn't look at  bigdarryl   Aug-30-11 01:07 PM   #22 
  - You And The Professor Are Right (Not)  DemocratSinceBirth   Aug-30-11 01:12 PM   #23 
     - you need to read his book  bigdarryl   Aug-30-11 06:42 PM   #33 
  - And Obama is the first president to have such a depression-level economy since FDR  scheming daemons   Aug-30-11 01:52 PM   #24 
  - I Don't Blame President Obama For This Crappy Economy  DemocratSinceBirth   Aug-30-11 01:59 PM   #26 
  - And Obama is the first president to have such a depression-level economy since FDR  scheming daemons   Aug-30-11 01:52 PM   #25 
  - You are probably right.  FedUp_Queer   Aug-30-11 02:04 PM   #27 
  - Wasn't it at about 7.5% when Reagan was re-elected?  JoePhilly   Aug-30-11 02:49 PM   #29 
  - It was, but it was 10.5 a year before the election  mkultra   Aug-31-11 12:33 PM   #41 
  - My Comments Are Made As A Dispassionate Observer And Not A Partisan  DemocratSinceBirth   Aug-31-11 05:27 PM   #44 
  - Actually, the unemployment rate was 7.4% in October 1984.  bornskeptic   Aug-30-11 04:00 PM   #30 
  - That number is an election day number  mkultra   Aug-31-11 12:32 PM   #40 
  - Nate Silver was right on the money in 2008  Juche   Aug-30-11 07:46 PM   #34 
  - I agree. Nate was spot-on (NT)  SlimJimmy   Aug-31-11 10:49 AM   #38 
  - All Nate Did Was Aggregate The Polls And He's Outstanding At It  DemocratSinceBirth   Sep-01-11 04:09 PM   #47 
  - So basically it's all just some sick game huh?  slay   Aug-30-11 10:09 PM   #36 
  - Probably. But can we survive.  Jakes Progress   Aug-30-11 10:39 PM   #37 
  - So, this system predicted Bush would win in 2000?  Freddie Stubbs   Aug-31-11 04:03 PM   #43 
  - no, THIS is the only never-fail system  Enrique   Sep-01-11 01:22 PM   #46 
 

Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC