Rowdyboy
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Aug-30-11 10:54 AM
Response to Reply #2 |
| 3. Another example of "an inconvenient truth" |
| -Never-fail prediction system shows 2012 win for Obama |
Playinghardball |
Aug-30-11 10:45 AM |
#0 |
 -
I think Obama will win, too. Perry, Bachmann, Romney, Paul? Please. |
No Elephants |
Aug-30-11 10:48 AM |
#1 |
  -
One reason they think Obama will win is because he is NOT getting primaried. |
Pirate Smile |
Aug-30-11 10:51 AM |
#2 |
| -
Another example of "an inconvenient truth" |
Rowdyboy |
Aug-30-11 10:54 AM |
#3 |
| -
Delete. Misunderstanding |
Maraya1969 |
Aug-30-11 10:58 AM |
#4 |
| -
I did not see that in the article. Where are you getting that information from? nt |
ZombieHorde |
Aug-30-11 11:11 AM |
#6 |
| -
I read an article on his keys last week and that was mentioned in it. Let me look for it. |
Pirate Smile |
Aug-30-11 11:31 AM |
#11 |
| -
Here you go - I posted it last week:"whether the president faces a serious challenge in the primary" |
Pirate Smile |
Aug-30-11 11:36 AM |
#14 |
| -
Thank you. Perhaps a "non-serious" primary challenger would be good. |
ZombieHorde |
Aug-30-11 11:45 AM |
#16 |
| -
A serious challenger results in a lose for the incumbent, not a win for the challenger |
mkultra |
Aug-31-11 12:30 PM |
#39 |
| -
That may be, but people often claim Kucinich is not a serious challenger |
ZombieHorde |
Aug-31-11 03:44 PM |
#42 |
| -
I would agree that he is not and would not be concerned with a primary from him |
mkultra |
Sep-01-11 10:49 AM |
#45 |
| -
How did the formula do on the other 49 presidential elections? |
MilesColtrane |
Aug-30-11 11:08 AM |
#5 |
| -
Did you miss the 3 decade long winning streak part? I guess we should invent a time machine just to |
DFab420 |
Aug-30-11 04:24 PM |
#31 |
| -
He must of been lucky w/2000 election. |
windowpilot |
Aug-30-11 11:15 AM |
#7 |
| -
No. He didn't get lucky. His system predicts the popular vote winner and he predicted Gore in 2000. |
phleshdef |
Aug-30-11 01:05 PM |
#21 |
| -
this is actually good news... |
Steerpike |
Aug-30-11 11:18 AM |
#8 |
| -
K & R |
Scurrilous |
Aug-30-11 11:24 AM |
#9 |
| -
The Keys |
Yukari Yakumo |
Aug-30-11 11:27 AM |
#10 |
| -
13 is going to be a big fat false |
treestar |
Aug-30-11 11:37 AM |
#15 |
| -
How does he know the answers to 2, 4, 8, or 9? |
Ter |
Aug-30-11 02:14 PM |
#28 |
| -
Did he predict the stolen 2000 and 2004 elections with this system? |
McCamy Taylor |
Aug-30-11 11:31 AM |
#12 |
| -
His system only predicts the popular vote |
denem |
Aug-30-11 12:24 PM |
#18 |
| -
Gore won the popular vote as Lichtman predicted he doesn't predict electoral collage votes |
bigdarryl |
Aug-30-11 01:05 PM |
#20 |
| -
The future is sometimes unlike the past? nt |
bemildred |
Aug-30-11 11:33 AM |
#13 |
| -
"Using the keys, it is hard to envision a scenario other than a Gore victory in November" |
denem |
Aug-30-11 12:19 PM |
#17 |
| -
Funny thing is...Gore won man...Gore won |
DFab420 |
Aug-30-11 04:26 PM |
#32 |
| -
Barely |
Juche |
Aug-30-11 07:49 PM |
#35 |
| -
The Last President To Be Re- Elected With An Unemployment Level > 7.2% Was FDR |
DemocratSinceBirth |
Aug-30-11 12:39 PM |
#19 |
| -
these unemployment numbers dont mean anything his system doesn't look at |
bigdarryl |
Aug-30-11 01:07 PM |
#22 |
| -
You And The Professor Are Right (Not) |
DemocratSinceBirth |
Aug-30-11 01:12 PM |
#23 |
| -
you need to read his book |
bigdarryl |
Aug-30-11 06:42 PM |
#33 |
| -
And Obama is the first president to have such a depression-level economy since FDR |
scheming daemons |
Aug-30-11 01:52 PM |
#24 |
| -
I Don't Blame President Obama For This Crappy Economy |
DemocratSinceBirth |
Aug-30-11 01:59 PM |
#26 |
| -
And Obama is the first president to have such a depression-level economy since FDR |
scheming daemons |
Aug-30-11 01:52 PM |
#25 |
| -
You are probably right. |
FedUp_Queer |
Aug-30-11 02:04 PM |
#27 |
| -
Wasn't it at about 7.5% when Reagan was re-elected? |
JoePhilly |
Aug-30-11 02:49 PM |
#29 |
| -
It was, but it was 10.5 a year before the election |
mkultra |
Aug-31-11 12:33 PM |
#41 |
| -
My Comments Are Made As A Dispassionate Observer And Not A Partisan |
DemocratSinceBirth |
Aug-31-11 05:27 PM |
#44 |
| -
Actually, the unemployment rate was 7.4% in October 1984. |
bornskeptic |
Aug-30-11 04:00 PM |
#30 |
| -
That number is an election day number |
mkultra |
Aug-31-11 12:32 PM |
#40 |
| -
Nate Silver was right on the money in 2008 |
Juche |
Aug-30-11 07:46 PM |
#34 |
| -
I agree. Nate was spot-on (NT) |
SlimJimmy |
Aug-31-11 10:49 AM |
#38 |
| -
All Nate Did Was Aggregate The Polls And He's Outstanding At It |
DemocratSinceBirth |
Sep-01-11 04:09 PM |
#47 |
| -
So basically it's all just some sick game huh? |
slay |
Aug-30-11 10:09 PM |
#36 |
| -
Probably. But can we survive. |
Jakes Progress |
Aug-30-11 10:39 PM |
#37 |
| -
So, this system predicted Bush would win in 2000? |
Freddie Stubbs |
Aug-31-11 04:03 PM |
#43 |
| -
no, THIS is the only never-fail system |
Enrique |
Sep-01-11 01:22 PM |
#46 |
Printer-friendly format
Email this thread to a friend
Bookmark this thread