polichick
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Aug-07-11 11:39 AM
Response to Reply #10 |
| 13. I'm not sure it would be any different this time. Dem activists tried to pressure... |
|
obstructionist Blue Dogs (TV ads etc.), only to have the WH trash the principled Dems and stand with the fucking Blue Dogs.
|
| -Which would you prefer? |
Onlooker |
Aug-07-11 11:22 AM |
#0 |
-
OTHER: Obama and Democratic congress. |
jefferson_dem |
Aug-07-11 11:24 AM |
#1 |
 -
We had that and squandered the historic opportunity. |
polichick |
Aug-07-11 11:27 AM |
#4 |
  -
Both points are highly debateable... |
jefferson_dem |
Aug-07-11 11:29 AM |
#6 |
   -
The proof is the position we're in right now. |
polichick |
Aug-07-11 11:32 AM |
#8 |
  -
And in the position next year when Obama tries to re-sell himself as a reformer for change |
Armstead |
Aug-07-11 11:35 AM |
#9 |
   -
Like any incumbent, he'll run on his record... |
jefferson_dem |
Aug-07-11 11:38 AM |
#12 |
    -
Good luck with that record thing...And so far I only hear echoing of the oppoisition |
Armstead |
Aug-07-11 12:18 PM |
#19 |
   -
See, that's the problem. |
jefferson_dem |
Aug-07-11 01:28 PM |
#23 |
    -
And that is why he needs to be Primaried. |
RC |
Aug-07-11 04:08 PM |
#27 |
     -
...just like the Republicans... |
jefferson_dem |
Aug-07-11 05:16 PM |
#29 |
    -
Sorry, I meant to say he isn't as crazy as the Republicans. |
RC |
Aug-07-11 08:01 PM |
#33 |
    -
That goes without saying...Sure I want Obama to win and I'm scared shitless of the GOP winning |
Armstead |
Aug-08-11 12:23 AM |
#35 |
   -
No difference |
Hawkowl |
Aug-07-11 04:00 PM |
#26 |
   -
True - at this point who does he think he's kidding? Everyone knows... |
polichick |
Aug-07-11 11:40 AM |
#14 |
  -
Well, the "proof" is based on the position we were in as the last Congress expired... |
jefferson_dem |
Aug-07-11 11:36 AM |
#10 |
  -
I'm not sure it would be any different this time. Dem activists tried to pressure... |
polichick |
Aug-07-11 11:39 AM |
#13 |
  -
I agree with you about the oppostunity part, but unfortunately... |
Armstead |
Aug-07-11 12:21 PM |
#20 |
  -
Believe that spin |
krawhitham |
Aug-07-11 04:16 PM |
#28 |
  -
We had it for a few miutes ... |
JoePhilly |
Aug-07-11 05:30 PM |
#31 |
  -
Go do a little research. |
Tx4obama |
Aug-07-11 08:48 PM |
#34 |
 -
That got us nothing. Blue Dogs sabotage all good legislation. |
harun |
Aug-08-11 12:37 AM |
#37 |
-
We'd be screwed either way |
AndyTiedye |
Aug-07-11 11:24 AM |
#2 |
-
It's also asking if a President is as helpless against a Congress as has been claimed. |
rug |
Aug-07-11 11:26 AM |
#3 |
-
At least one more SCOTUS member will retire before 2016. |
onehandle |
Aug-07-11 11:27 AM |
#5 |
-
Get some real Democrats in Congress or put fear in the bones |
OHdem10 |
Aug-07-11 11:29 AM |
#7 |
-
I would 'prefer'..... |
daleanime |
Aug-07-11 11:37 AM |
#11 |
-
Both are pretty much the same |
Mz Pip |
Aug-07-11 11:41 AM |
#15 |
-
Obama, Democratic Congress, end of the 60 vote cloture threshold. |
pinto |
Aug-07-11 11:43 AM |
#16 |
-
I declare this poll Evil Conundrum! |
Warren Stupidity |
Aug-07-11 11:43 AM |
#17 |
-
Hands down: 2/3 Democratic super majority in congress with ability to over-ride presidential vetoes. |
LAGC |
Aug-07-11 12:17 PM |
#18 |
 -
No, even under that scenario there is a lot of damage that a GOP president could do. |
totodeinhere |
Aug-07-11 12:33 PM |
#22 |
-
1. O had (D) Congress and Caved, 2. O had (D) Senate and Caved Even More, 3. O w/(R) Congress == OMG |
vroomvroom |
Aug-07-11 12:23 PM |
#21 |
-
"Romney and a Democratic Congress" |
ProSense |
Aug-07-11 01:29 PM |
#24 |
 -
Dismiss. |
jefferson_dem |
Aug-07-11 01:54 PM |
#25 |
-
Unless the Democratic majority was large enough to be able to override vetoes, |
boxman15 |
Aug-07-11 05:19 PM |
#30 |
 -
I would prefer solid liberal majorities in both Houses and a bona fide liberal in the White House. |
totodeinhere |
Aug-07-11 07:22 PM |
#32 |
-
Other: A Democratic Congress with balls. (and no pics) n/t |
DebJ |
Aug-08-11 12:34 AM |
#36 |