You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login

Reply #46: We need one of those Calvin & Hobbes cartoon ones where Calvin's pissing! [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU
calimary Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-07-11 05:54 PM
Response to Reply #43
46. We need one of those Calvin & Hobbes cartoon ones where Calvin's pissing!
I see those on various back windshields quite often.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
  -Obama "Should've taken OBL alive+Shouldn't have dumped body at sea+Wrong to go to Ground Zero" = Keith Bee  May-07-11 02:13 AM   #0 
  - LOL.  murielm99   May-07-11 02:20 AM   #1 
  - You think I need a new one?  Keith Bee   May-07-11 08:20 AM   #8 
     - NO! Don't change it! 'Cause I STILL wanna piss in their tea!  calimary   May-07-11 02:15 PM   #38 
        - Okay, even though.....  Keith Bee   May-07-11 02:47 PM   #39 
           - Oh, you can change it to whatever you like. I just really love the idea of pissing in their tea!  calimary   May-07-11 03:00 PM   #40 
              - Unfortunately, no  Keith Bee   May-07-11 04:44 PM   #43 
                 - We need one of those Calvin & Hobbes cartoon ones where Calvin's pissing!  calimary   May-07-11 05:54 PM   #46 
                    - Really?  Keith Bee   May-08-11 10:34 AM   #50 
                       - ROFL!  calimary   May-09-11 05:13 PM   #51 
  - That is "exactly" what I overheard a patient say today.  Lost-in-FL   May-07-11 02:29 AM   #2 
  - Them GOPers are Phucked......its their own fault.....picked the Boner to run the House  opihimoimoi   May-07-11 03:33 AM   # 
  - Then they picked the Trump, Palin, Ryan Combo to help sell the deal...  opihimoimoi   May-07-11 03:33 AM   #3 
  - They had 7 years to do it their way.  Lasher   May-07-11 04:29 AM   #4 
  - How sweet that whine is!  pnorman   May-07-11 04:31 AM   #5 
  - I wonder.....  Keith Bee   May-07-11 12:51 PM   #34 
  - Even a broken clock is right twice a day, and they got 2-out-of-3 right, here.  leveymg   May-07-11 05:24 AM   #6 
  - More theater criticism.  JoePhilly   May-07-11 07:16 AM   #7 
  - I totally disagree  localroger   May-07-11 09:05 AM   #9 
  - It's not an either/or proposition. You've obviously never deposed anyone before trial or  leveymg   May-07-11 10:50 AM   #12 
  - Obviously, but I was replying to an either-or comparison  localroger   May-07-11 11:16 AM   #14 
     - Are you seriously claiming that they could not have captured him, if that was the order?  leveymg   May-07-11 11:29 AM   #16 
        - I wasn't saying anything about that at all  localroger   May-07-11 11:37 AM   #17 
        - He didn't use email or drop points. He used couriers, or haven't you been following this story?  leveymg   May-07-11 11:40 AM   #19 
           - And to whom did the couriers carry?  localroger   May-07-11 11:47 AM   #21 
              - They killed the couriers too, so we can't ask them. Are you beginning to get the picture?  leveymg   May-07-11 11:51 AM   #23 
                 - They don't need the couriers either.  localroger   May-07-11 12:22 PM   #25 
        - Huh? You're demanding he be tried and therefore the 5th applies to him, no?  treestar   May-07-11 12:27 PM   #28 
        - Bingo  localroger   May-07-11 12:31 PM   # 
        - Yes, it would be completely without value because  NYC Liberal   May-07-11 12:57 PM   #35 
  - Absolutely. The post you responded to was the dumbest idea ever.  treestar   May-07-11 12:25 PM   #27 
     - Not just dumb  Keith Bee   May-07-11 02:05 PM   #37 
  - I'm glad they didn't capture him.  Diamonique   May-07-11 09:48 AM   #11 
     - Obviously you value emotional closure more than ascertaining the facts of a crime.  leveymg   May-07-11 10:56 AM   #13 
     - The "facts of the crime" are not in dispute  localroger   May-07-11 11:39 AM   #18 
        - The point isn't to make a case against him - it's to identify his key confederates.  leveymg   May-07-11 11:43 AM   #20 
           - You make my case and then totally miss it  localroger   May-07-11 11:50 AM   #22 
              - I doubt if he kept his pre-9/11 contact list on his recent laptops.  leveymg   May-07-11 11:56 AM   #24 
                 - And what does his pre-911 list have to do with anything?  localroger   May-07-11 12:27 PM   #29 
     - exactly....the opreation was handled exactly as it should have been.  ElsewheresDaughter   May-07-11 05:56 PM   #47 
        - One star would be enough (better than Bushie)  Keith Bee   May-07-11 07:22 PM   #48 
  - They would criticise Obama no matter what he did.  RichGirl   May-07-11 09:16 AM   #10 
  - Exactly. They have no intention of doing anything other than carping.  treestar   May-07-11 12:30 PM   #30 
  - Sadly, bin Laden's followers are easier to placate than our own damn wingnuts!  Keith Bee   May-07-11 04:02 PM   #41 
  - Their "Obama is weak on foreign policy" meme is too!  Proud Liberal Dem   May-07-11 11:22 AM   #15 
  - Right, they usually advocate doing something  treestar   May-07-11 12:31 PM   #31 
  - Actually, the Obama hating 9/11 family members Fox continuously has on now do.  Mayberry Machiavelli   May-07-11 12:37 PM   #32 
     - I guess I spoke too soon  Proud Liberal Dem   May-07-11 02:03 PM   #36 
     - That may be it  Keith Bee   May-07-11 04:41 PM   #42 
  - They can't even take this with any grace!  treestar   May-07-11 12:24 PM   #26 
  - NO! NO! NO! NO! NO!  Keith Bee   May-07-11 05:49 PM   #44 
  - Deleted message  Name removed   May-07-11 12:37 PM   #33 
  - amazing sour grapes!!!!  Rosa Luxemburg   May-07-11 05:50 PM   #45 
     - The "sour grapes" fable involved a FOX, if I recall correctly  Keith Bee   May-08-11 02:02 AM   #49 

Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators

Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC