Hawkowl
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Apr-02-11 10:26 PM
Response to Reply #17 |
| 39. Actually Obama has been planning since early 90's |
|
Everyone in Chicago joked in the 90's that Obama was running for president even back then. You can't win unless you start running decades out.
|
| -Who should Progressives be Vetting Now for a 2016 Presidential Run? |
Tom Rinaldo |
Apr-02-11 02:58 PM |
#0 |
-
Vetting is very important |
Botany |
Apr-02-11 03:02 PM |
#1 |
 -
True. Maybe we should look for a military vet vetinarian :) n/t |
Tom Rinaldo |
Apr-02-11 03:05 PM |
#3 |
-
In addition to our "wishes" we have to be practical and put up somebody who could |
gateley |
Apr-02-11 03:03 PM |
#2 |
 -
I'll admit it, I'm woefully unprepared right now |
Tom Rinaldo |
Apr-02-11 03:09 PM |
#5 |
-
Cory Booker, the mayor you mention may run for Governor in 2013 |
karynnj |
Apr-02-11 05:41 PM |
#28 |
-
The way our media culture works, if Booker were to beat Christie in 2013 |
Tom Rinaldo |
Apr-02-11 05:50 PM |
#29 |
-
Either Hillary or one of the western governors who won in '06. |
craigmatic |
Apr-02-11 03:07 PM |
#4 |
 -
WTF |
BlueJac |
Apr-02-11 03:11 PM |
#6 |
  -
I give two WTFs.... |
movonne |
Apr-02-11 03:37 PM |
#19 |
  -
what's with the wtfs? |
craigmatic |
Apr-02-11 08:01 PM |
#31 |
 -
OK, so going with that premise... |
Tom Rinaldo |
Apr-02-11 03:12 PM |
#7 |
  -
Well Tester seems likeable and progressive enough for the job. |
craigmatic |
Apr-02-11 08:02 PM |
#32 |
 -
Hillary's retiring from politics, thankfully. Besides, neocons need not apply. |
InAbLuEsTaTe |
Apr-02-11 10:05 PM |
#36 |
 -
Hillary??? |
NorthCarolina |
Apr-03-11 07:31 AM |
#46 |
-
Who are progressives vetting |
ProSense |
Apr-02-11 03:13 PM |
#8 |
 -
Good question |
Tom Rinaldo |
Apr-02-11 03:16 PM |
#10 |
-
Martin O'Malley has done pretty well in Maryland |
dsc |
Apr-02-11 03:14 PM |
#9 |
 -
What I hope more of us do this time starts with the type list you threw out |
Tom Rinaldo |
Apr-02-11 03:25 PM |
#16 |
-
Why wait till 2016. The 2012 Primaries come well before that., and I don't think America |
NorthCarolina |
Apr-02-11 03:17 PM |
#11 |
 -
I know opinions differ on this |
Tom Rinaldo |
Apr-02-11 03:20 PM |
#12 |
 -
Please keep your feet on this planet. NO ultra leftie will EVER win. Obama will. Soundly. |
RBInMaine |
Apr-02-11 03:23 PM |
#14 |
 -
Why wait? |
jefferson_dem |
Apr-02-11 04:10 PM |
#23 |
 -
I agree - with the union busting and general over-reach of Republicans, NOW is the time... |
polichick |
Apr-02-11 04:29 PM |
#25 |
 -
There will be no serious primary challange of Obama. |
JoePhilly |
Apr-02-11 05:31 PM |
#27 |
-
WAY too far out to be thinking like this, and no far-lefter will win the Presidency. So stay real. |
RBInMaine |
Apr-02-11 03:21 PM |
#13 |
 -
not really |
dsc |
Apr-02-11 03:26 PM |
#17 |
  -
Actually Obama has been planning since early 90's |
Hawkowl |
Apr-02-11 10:26 PM |
#39 |
 -
Feingold has a real chance to follow in Obama's footsteps. Would make a fine president. |
InAbLuEsTaTe |
Apr-02-11 10:07 PM |
#37 |
-
I'd like to think Feingold would blaze his own trail |
dflprincess |
Apr-02-11 10:14 PM |
#38 |
-
Obama has got to tap a succesor the way FDR did. |
Skink |
Apr-02-11 03:23 PM |
#15 |
 -
The problem is that the successor FDR tapped |
Pab Sungenis |
Apr-02-11 03:54 PM |
#21 |
  -
Then there is the question of whether Obama would even consider tapping someone progressive |
Tom Rinaldo |
Apr-02-11 03:59 PM |
#22 |
  -
Not quite correct. Byrnes was rejected primarily for being too conservative. |
bornskeptic |
Apr-02-11 10:42 PM |
#40 |
 -
I wouldn't trust him to tap a progressive - his personnel choices mostly stink. |
polichick |
Apr-02-11 04:12 PM |
#24 |
 -
Hopefully? |
pmorlan1 |
Apr-03-11 10:47 PM |
#56 |
-
There was a time when I was interested in Montana's Governor |
Tom Rinaldo |
Apr-02-11 03:36 PM |
#18 |
-
Someone who has impressed me for his progressive values, guts and smarts |
Tom Rinaldo |
Apr-02-11 03:47 PM |
#20 |
-
I think you ask the right question, but Progressives don't seem to be willing |
JoePhilly |
Apr-02-11 05:27 PM |
#26 |
-
Democratic 2016 candidate |
Democratic Purist |
Apr-02-11 07:46 PM |
#30 |
 -
Elizabeth Warren is an extremely interesting choice |
Tom Rinaldo |
Apr-03-11 10:07 AM |
#49 |
-
Russ |
MadBadger |
Apr-02-11 08:02 PM |
#33 |
 -
He is my choice as well. |
femmocrat |
Apr-02-11 08:15 PM |
#34 |
-
Brian Switzer, Martin O'Malley, Andrew Cuomo. Those are the first Dems I can think of that may be |
Pirate Smile |
Apr-02-11 08:19 PM |
#35 |
-
A pointed unrec |
Keith Bee |
Apr-02-11 10:47 PM |
#41 |
-
Alan Grayson |
cheri010353 |
Apr-02-11 11:25 PM |
#42 |
-
How about someone from labor |
midnight armadillo |
Apr-02-11 11:29 PM |
#43 |
-
Sherrod Brown. n/t |
OhioBlue |
Apr-03-11 12:52 AM |
#44 |
 -
Sherrod would be my choice too. |
Auntie Bush |
Apr-03-11 09:58 PM |
#53 |
-
Very interesting question and thread. Thanks. |
jaxx |
Apr-03-11 04:53 AM |
#45 |
-
Progressives should quit worrying about this and get to work on |
treestar |
Apr-03-11 09:13 AM |
#47 |
 -
Largely I agree with you |
Tom Rinaldo |
Apr-03-11 09:56 AM |
#48 |
 -
+1 |
Lisa D |
Apr-03-11 12:31 PM |
#51 |
-
Obama will win in 2012 handedly, but 2016 is probably a lost cause |
Ter |
Apr-03-11 11:50 AM |
#50 |
-
Wes Clark |
thelordofhell |
Apr-03-11 06:40 PM |
#52 |
 -
I think Clark might be too old to consider the job in 2016 plus maybe 8 more. |
Auntie Bush |
Apr-03-11 10:02 PM |
#54 |
 -
I like him as a person |
ecstatic |
Apr-04-11 04:00 PM |
#59 |
-
I can't help but notice that many of the most vocal anti-Obama folks ... |
JoePhilly |
Apr-03-11 10:09 PM |
#55 |
 -
Most of those people are not truly on our side |
ecstatic |
Apr-04-11 03:56 PM |
#58 |
-
For 2016, I like Dean, Clinton (as long as she is still mentally |
ecstatic |
Apr-04-11 03:51 PM |
#57 |