Reply #15: Calling for it and implying that Obama did an "impeachable offense"

[vaberella]

Is not far from the same thing. And by going further to expand that proceedings don't need to be made immediately shows a clear message. You're aiming at semantics, but the language was put out there. If he said something along the lines of "I think this calls for a full study on the extension of powers for the President in times of war.." That's one thing. But to "invoke" which is what I believe the OP stated or even say---"be an impeachable offense" people will naturally read that as him calling for impeachment----along with the other liberal Dems.