You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login

Reply #16: National Review? ugh [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU
SnakeEyes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-18-11 09:51 PM
Response to Original message
16. National Review? ugh
Anyway... this is war... or rather perpetual conflict ala Iraq/Saddam.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
  -Obama official: Its not designed to have Qaddafi go. Thats not the purpose, Clio the Leo  Mar-18-11 07:53 PM   #0 
  - This feels like a bad idea.  dkf   Mar-18-11 08:02 PM   #1 
  - For me as well.  vaberella   Mar-18-11 08:36 PM   #6 
  - it just FEELS bad huh?  Clio the Leo   Mar-18-11 09:19 PM   #11 
     - Once we get involved who knows. What's that saying about the best of intentions?  dkf   Mar-18-11 09:52 PM   #17 
     - Well, for one, Obama knows.....  Clio the Leo   Mar-18-11 10:04 PM   #18 
     - Why there are 50,000 troops still in Iraq?  golfguru   Mar-19-11 04:11 PM   #31 
  - That's why the warmongers will still be angry with Obama.  David__77   Mar-18-11 08:03 PM   #2 
  - It's becoming very clear after all I've read tonight...  Clio the Leo   Mar-18-11 09:21 PM   #12 
  - National Review  ProSense   Mar-18-11 08:04 PM   #3 
  - The left is on the same page for another reason.  vaberella   Mar-18-11 08:39 PM   #8 
  - Why is there ALWAYS money for war, but there is NEVER money for WE THE PEOPLE? n/t  RoccoR5955   Mar-18-11 08:16 PM   #4 
  - This isn't supposed to be a war.  vaberella   Mar-18-11 08:40 PM   #9 
     - aided by the French and the UK's fighter jets...  Clio the Leo   Mar-18-11 09:22 PM   #13 
     - As they shouldn't be.  vaberella   Mar-18-11 09:31 PM   #15 
        - yeah but sadly or otherwise, that's not how the UN works. nt  Clio the Leo   Mar-18-11 10:05 PM   #19 
     - As long as the military is involved in firing weapons, I call it war! n/t  RoccoR5955   Mar-19-11 11:42 PM   #40 
     - No, it's not.  Youth Uprising   Mar-20-11 06:30 AM   #42 
  - sounds like an open ended mission then?  woolldog   Mar-18-11 08:18 PM   #5 
  - That's not it. It's not about him going.  vaberella   Mar-18-11 08:38 PM   #7 
  - If Q stays in power  woolldog   Mar-19-11 09:48 AM   #23 
  - Well, ya know if EGYPT wanted to help arm the rebels....  Clio the Leo   Mar-18-11 09:24 PM   #14 
  - That will take years and years to be effective  woolldog   Mar-19-11 09:52 AM   #24 
  - That's the way we like military interventions - long and protracted.  sad sally   Mar-19-11 03:57 PM   #30 
  - Good point--if we can get Muammar to stop killing the rebels,  Arkana   Mar-18-11 09:16 PM   #10 
  - I think that's the general point of the mission. n/t  vaberella   Mar-19-11 04:22 PM   #35 
  - National Review? ugh  SnakeEyes   Mar-18-11 09:51 PM   #16 
  - This, after saying "...Col. Gaddafi needs to step down from power and leave."  PurityOfEssence   Mar-18-11 11:01 PM   #20 
  - Yes- sounds like someone did not hear Obama say that..Kind of pointless to leave Ghadaffi in place..  old mark   Mar-19-11 09:31 AM   #22 
  - You'll never convince me that Obama is not...  Teaser   Mar-19-11 08:38 AM   #21 
  - In President Obama's defense, he has yet to create and release a country music album.  ZombieHorde   Mar-19-11 11:40 AM   #28 
     - Hey I love me some Johnny Cash, Conway Twitty, Kenny Rogers, and Dolly Parton. n/t  vaberella   Mar-19-11 04:21 PM   #34 
        - Totally depraved. You remind me of the German gentleman who  ZombieHorde   Mar-19-11 08:25 PM   #39 
  - Uh...wait...what? Not get rid of him? Oh this should be real good.  Safetykitten   Mar-19-11 10:11 AM   #25 
  - The point is to protect the people. That's the point and his meaning.  vaberella   Mar-19-11 04:14 PM   #32 
     - Because firing tomahawk missiles into Tripoli  Abq_Sarah   Mar-20-11 12:26 AM   #41 
  - Good. It shouldn't be to oust or target Gaddafi, but to mitigate the  tekisui   Mar-19-11 10:42 AM   #26 
  - Deleted message  Name removed   Mar-19-11 11:10 AM   #27 
  - Didn't the President say last week that Qaddafi had to go?  sad sally   Mar-19-11 03:50 PM   #29 
  - If you don't understand...ask for clarity, don't make up outlandish stories that are incorrect.  vaberella   Mar-19-11 04:19 PM   #33 
     - Thanks for the scolding. I feel duly reprimanded.  sad sally   Mar-19-11 05:00 PM   #36 
        - Already have...I'm Haitian, now Haitian-American. n/t  vaberella   Mar-19-11 05:50 PM   #37 
  - It's about profits for the weapons manufacturers. nt  Critters2   Mar-19-11 05:53 PM   #38 

Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators

Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC