You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #20: You do? You have a strange OP way to show it [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU
impik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-24-11 10:23 AM
Response to Reply #19
20. You do? You have a strange OP way to show it
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
  -Why is the NYT article proof that Obama won't cut SS? Dawgs  Jan-24-11 09:24 AM   #0 
  - Because the burden of proof is on the people who said he was going to cut it?  Godhumor   Jan-24-11 09:26 AM   #1 
  - I think there is about the same amount of proof on both sides.  Dawgs   Jan-24-11 09:28 AM   #3 
     - Burden of proof always lies on the side making the claim. No proof was ever presented, ever  Godhumor   Jan-24-11 09:36 AM   #4 
     - Aren't people "making the claim" that Obama won't cut it because of the NYT article?  Dawgs   Jan-24-11 10:06 AM   #12 
        - No, people were stating the obvious that he won't cut it way before there was ever an article.  phleshdef   Jan-24-11 10:08 AM   #13 
        - Again, the burden of proof is on those saying he is going to cut it  Godhumor   Jan-24-11 10:14 AM   #15 
           - Yes and No.  Dawgs   Jan-24-11 10:20 AM   #18 
              - NYT article is a piece on continuation of policy  Godhumor   Jan-24-11 10:31 AM   #22 
     - Yea, just like none of us really know the FEMA death camps don't exist.  phleshdef   Jan-24-11 09:40 AM   #5 
     - but you don't let that stop you, do you?  HeroTwins   Jan-24-11 12:05 PM   #25 
  - He has kept a ton of promises. Promises has nothing to do with it.  phleshdef   Jan-24-11 09:28 AM   #2 
  - Fail  BklnDem75   Jan-24-11 09:49 AM   #6 
  - And equally, there is nothing in the NYT article that states Obama will not cut SS...  Dawgs   Jan-24-11 10:03 AM   #11 
     - So in your scenario, there's no winning  BklnDem75   Jan-24-11 10:08 AM   #14 
        - I'll be saying the he made promises before and broke them because he did.  Dawgs   Jan-24-11 10:18 AM   #16 
  - No. He did not promise to include the public option,  elleng   Jan-24-11 09:54 AM   #7 
  - someone forced him to sign his name to it?  Enrique   Jan-24-11 09:58 AM   #8 
  - He DID promise a public option.  Dawgs   Jan-24-11 10:01 AM   #9 
  - it's not proof, but it does contradict the speculation  Enrique   Jan-24-11 10:02 AM   #10 
  - It's no less proof that the bullshit rumor on which this all circus started  impik   Jan-24-11 10:19 AM   #17 
  - Why so angry?  Dawgs   Jan-24-11 10:20 AM   #19 
     - You do? You have a strange OP way to show it  impik   Jan-24-11 10:23 AM   #20 
  - Because the burden of proof rests  Arkana   Jan-24-11 10:24 AM   #21 
  - You mean we're not going to find out that...  Davis_X_Machina   Jan-24-11 11:16 AM   #23 
  - Deleted message  Name removed   Jan-24-11 12:05 PM   #24 
  - No. He never promised a public option.  Phx_Dem   Jan-24-11 12:43 PM   #26 
 

Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC