yourout
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Dec-13-10 05:04 PM
Response to Original message |
| 18. Tell me another lie Scotty. |
|
Did his nose grow about a foot while he was talking.
|
| -Gibbs: Obama won't need to veto Bush tax cuts, because Congress won't pass them |
Enrique |
Dec-13-10 03:33 PM |
#0 |
 -
September was when Obama thought Congress would stand strong ... |
frazzled |
Dec-13-10 03:42 PM |
#1 |
 -
Someone has to do the heavy lifting every time Congress wimps out. |
Phx_Dem |
Dec-13-10 03:47 PM |
#3 |
 -
Yep. Congress punted, because they were scared of Teabaggers screaming about taxes, |
Ikonoklast |
Dec-13-10 04:00 PM |
#7 |
| -
Hear. Hear. I second it, Ikonoklast. Once again, Congress |
BlueCaliDem |
Dec-13-10 04:31 PM |
#13 |
| -
They showed themselves as either unwilling to take the hard votes, |
Ikonoklast |
Dec-13-10 05:17 PM |
#20 |
| -
Well, Congress may have punted, but Obama caught the ball and holds the destiny of ... |
Exilednight |
Dec-13-10 07:00 PM |
#21 |
| -
Yeah, screw them lazy unemployed people, and let ALL the tax cuts expire! |
Ikonoklast |
Dec-13-10 07:37 PM |
#22 |
| -
Well, here's the options in the real world. He could veto the tax cuts now and |
Exilednight |
Dec-13-10 07:56 PM |
#23 |
| -
Glad it isn't up to you. |
Ikonoklast |
Dec-13-10 10:09 PM |
#25 |
| -
It's not about purity. It's about what's best for the country in the ........... |
Exilednight |
Dec-13-10 10:16 PM |
#26 |
| -
Yes, we know he is not a Fighter but... |
sciencewins |
Dec-13-10 03:43 PM |
#2 |
| -
"just get whatever you can get and be happy with that" |
FiveGoodMen |
Dec-13-10 04:01 PM |
#8 |
| -
This statement is no longer operative: |
Jackpine Radical |
Dec-13-10 03:49 PM |
#4 |
| -
That was back when Congressional Democrats had some power. |
Occam Bandage |
Dec-13-10 03:55 PM |
#5 |
| -
Just like they planned it. Make no mistake. This was a collaboration |
BlueCaliDem |
Dec-13-10 04:33 PM |
#15 |
| -
Quit pouring SALT in the goddam wound!!! Good find. There are some flaming fannies in the WH. |
chimpymustgo |
Dec-13-10 03:59 PM |
#6 |
| -
Does this mean that |
ProSense |
Dec-13-10 04:01 PM |
#9 |
| -
Deleted message |
Name removed |
Dec-13-10 04:31 PM |
#12 |
| -
I suppose based on your response |
ProSense |
Dec-13-10 04:32 PM |
#14 |
| -
Oh. Is that what that was? |
progressoid |
Dec-13-10 04:38 PM |
#16 |
| -
We don't have a two party system |
mascientist |
Dec-13-10 04:13 PM |
#10 |
| -
I fear you are right. |
Enthusiast |
Dec-13-10 04:29 PM |
#11 |
| -
Welcome... and good 1st post. |
walldude |
Dec-13-10 05:15 PM |
#19 |
| -
WTF..then why the hell did he work so hard for this "compromise"??????? |
BrklynLiberal |
Dec-13-10 04:43 PM |
#17 |
| -
Because Congress did *not* pass a bill allowing the top tier of tax cuts to expire. |
Nicholas D Wolfwood |
Dec-15-10 03:29 PM |
#30 |
| -
Tell me another lie Scotty. |
yourout |
Dec-13-10 05:04 PM |
#18 |
| -
Hoping the Reps could see reason |
Sheepshank |
Dec-13-10 09:59 PM |
#24 |
| -
A time when Republican could not get them passed--now the minority can. |
Supersedeas |
Dec-15-10 11:05 AM |
#27 |
| -
Actions speak louder than words... |
polichick |
Dec-15-10 11:13 AM |
#28 |
| -
because the repukes are holding UI extention hostage. but you knew that. |
dionysus |
Dec-15-10 11:38 AM |
#29 |
| -
What do you expect and empty suit to do? |
Milo_Bloom |
Dec-15-10 03:30 PM |
#31 |
| -
Well, I guess he is wrong again....nt |
old mark |
Dec-15-10 05:00 PM |
#32 |
Printer-friendly format
Email this thread to a friend
Bookmark this thread