Name removed
(0 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Dec-01-10 01:42 PM
Response to Original message |
|
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules. |
| -Isn't it WAY past time to stop thinking the prez is naive or weak?? |
polichick |
Dec-01-10 01:01 PM |
#0 |
 -
you'll posted this spam in tons of threads today.... it needed an OP? |
dionysus |
Dec-01-10 01:02 PM |
#1 |
  -
It's a compilation, inspired by frustration - even Big Ed keeps calling the prez weak. nt |
polichick |
Dec-01-10 01:05 PM |
#3 |
| -
"...even Big Ed..." |
zulchzulu |
Dec-01-10 01:08 PM |
#8 |
| -
I appreciate what he does, but want to scream lately. nt |
polichick |
Dec-01-10 01:09 PM |
#9 |
| -
some call it scream |
dave29 |
Dec-01-10 01:14 PM |
#15 |
| -
"others call it spam" |
niceypoo |
Dec-01-10 01:59 PM |
#33 |
| -
how many times must it be refuted? |
dave29 |
Dec-01-10 02:47 PM |
#51 |
| -
..and your put down of Ed's credibility is based on exactly what? |
whathehell |
Dec-01-10 08:44 PM |
#64 |
| -
People think he yells too much I guess |
AndrewP |
Dec-01-10 10:10 PM |
#68 |
| -
Yes...There is a lot to yell about |
whathehell |
Dec-02-10 02:04 AM |
#70 |
| -
Yeah, here's |
ProSense |
Dec-01-10 01:04 PM |
#2 |
| -
Yeah, perfect! He opened our waters to more drilling just days before the spill. nt |
polichick |
Dec-01-10 01:07 PM |
#5 |
| -
Is that what the current release is about? |
ProSense |
Dec-01-10 01:11 PM |
#12 |
| -
Recommended., |
Autumn |
Dec-01-10 01:07 PM |
#4 |
| -
I guess it's more acceptable to think of him as naive or weak. nt |
polichick |
Dec-01-10 01:21 PM |
#18 |
| -
Bingo! |
ej510 |
Dec-01-10 05:03 PM |
#61 |
| -
I'm afraid you're right. |
lob1 |
Dec-01-10 01:07 PM |
#6 |
| -
It's something nobody wants to be right about - but how long are we supposed to keep pretending? nt |
polichick |
Dec-01-10 01:23 PM |
#19 |
| -
If he's into maintaining the corporate status quo, who did ALL |
babylonsister |
Dec-01-10 01:08 PM |
#7 |
| -
The last time Obama ran, they supported him. nt |
polichick |
Dec-01-10 01:11 PM |
#11 |
| -
You have no valid answer, do you. Thanks for playing. nt |
babylonsister |
Dec-01-10 01:14 PM |
#14 |
| -
Sorry you can't handle the truth - thanks for dropping by. nt |
polichick |
Dec-01-10 01:16 PM |
#16 |
| -
I thought she gave a valid answer. |
Dr.Phool |
Dec-01-10 01:29 PM |
#21 |
| -
Bullshit-you can't use what you don't own. (nt) |
great white snark |
Dec-01-10 02:35 PM |
#47 |
| -
The instabilty in political dominance favors international corporations |
PufPuf23 |
Dec-01-10 05:01 PM |
#60 |
| -
No it isn't. What it is: way past time to stop debating it. |
cherokeeprogressive |
Dec-01-10 01:10 PM |
#10 |
| -
So, what you mean to say is there is no difference between Barack and a Republican |
dave29 |
Dec-01-10 01:12 PM |
#13 |
| -
There are differences - Republicans don't care about tweaking things. nt |
polichick |
Dec-01-10 01:20 PM |
#17 |
| -
so do you consider yourself a Democrat or a Green Voter? |
dave29 |
Dec-01-10 02:46 PM |
#50 |
| -
I'm a liberal, currently Dem, who is interested in policies much more... |
polichick |
Dec-01-10 02:52 PM |
#53 |
| -
Kick and Rec! |
Dr.Phool |
Dec-01-10 01:27 PM |
#20 |
| -
Just read THE MENDACITY OF HOPE by Roger Hodge... |
polichick |
Dec-01-10 01:58 PM |
#30 |
| -
Yes, HCR=Status Quo, Financial Reform=Status Quo, CFPA=Status Quo, Lilly Leadbetter=Status Quo |
Beetwasher |
Dec-01-10 01:33 PM |
#22 |
| -
HRC left the insurance industry and big pharma better off than they were... |
polichick |
Dec-01-10 01:44 PM |
#24 |
| -
Bullshit, It's The Farthest Thing From Status Quo, Unless You Redefine Status Quo To Mean "Change" |
Beetwasher |
Dec-01-10 01:45 PM |
#25 |
| -
LOL- do we have gov't run universal healthcare or a mandate... |
polichick |
Dec-01-10 01:48 PM |
#26 |
| -
Is The Government NOW For The First Time EVER Involved In Regulating Health Care? |
Beetwasher |
Dec-01-10 01:49 PM |
#27 |
| -
Maintaining the corporate status quo means business as usual with... |
polichick |
Dec-01-10 01:52 PM |
#28 |
| -
LOL! Oh, So Now Status Quo Means "A Bit Of Tweaking?" |
Beetwasher |
Dec-01-10 01:54 PM |
#29 |
| -
Your reading comprehension needs a little work. nt |
polichick |
Dec-01-10 01:58 PM |
#31 |
| -
You Need To Address Me As "Yer Majesty!" Since I've Now Redefined "Beetwasher" To Mean |
Beetwasher |
Dec-01-10 02:00 PM |
#34 |
| -
HAH! |
Egnever |
Dec-01-10 02:13 PM |
#40 |
| -
LOL! +1 |
JTFrog |
Dec-01-10 04:53 PM |
#59 |
| -
Deleted message |
Name removed |
Dec-01-10 01:42 PM |
#23 |
| -
Hey, you forgot to plug that book! |
Starbucks Anarchist |
Dec-01-10 01:59 PM |
#32 |
| -
Haven't written it yet. :) |
polichick |
Dec-01-10 02:03 PM |
#35 |
| -
You mean your name isn't Roger Hodge? |
Starbucks Anarchist |
Dec-01-10 02:04 PM |
#36 |
| -
Guess it's not only the teabaggers who thinking reading well-researched books is bad. nt |
polichick |
Dec-01-10 02:06 PM |
#37 |
| -
Nice strawman. |
Starbucks Anarchist |
Dec-01-10 02:11 PM |
#38 |
| -
I've read a lot of books about our government lately - keep laughing... |
polichick |
Dec-01-10 02:12 PM |
#39 |
| -
Congratulations on having a library card. |
Starbucks Anarchist |
Dec-01-10 02:13 PM |
#41 |
| -
Try using a library card - you might have something worthwhile to add. nt |
polichick |
Dec-01-10 02:25 PM |
#42 |
| -
I've had them most of my life and use them frequently. |
Starbucks Anarchist |
Dec-01-10 02:29 PM |
#43 |
| -
Do your homework - I've posted about many books... |
polichick |
Dec-01-10 02:30 PM |
#44 |
| -
My apologies for not keeping tabs on you 24/7, internet stranger. |
Starbucks Anarchist |
Dec-01-10 02:32 PM |
#45 |
| -
Still nothing worthwhile to add - even after reading so many books... |
polichick |
Dec-01-10 02:34 PM |
#46 |
| -
I have posted about many books... |
Starbucks Anarchist |
Dec-01-10 02:38 PM |
#48 |
| -
Face-to-face at... |
polichick |
Dec-01-10 02:41 PM |
#49 |
| -
No, all over the place. |
Starbucks Anarchist |
Dec-01-10 02:47 PM |
#52 |
| -
The name fits you. nt |
polichick |
Dec-01-10 02:53 PM |
#54 |
| -
Likewise. |
Starbucks Anarchist |
Dec-01-10 03:07 PM |
#55 |
| -
This liberal has no problem with the word "chick" - but nice try. nt |
polichick |
Dec-01-10 03:12 PM |
#56 |
| -
Oh goody - infighting amongst Democratic detractors |
CakeGrrl |
Dec-01-10 03:58 PM |
#57 |
| -
LOL - I'm leaning toward Dem who likes the corporate structure. nt |
polichick |
Dec-01-10 04:00 PM |
#58 |
| -
Yup. |
woo me with science |
Dec-01-10 06:00 PM |
#62 |
| -
Of course you got it exactly right. His "historical accomplishments" consist |
Greyhound |
Dec-01-10 07:01 PM |
#63 |
| -
YES and Hell Yes. n/t |
whathehell |
Dec-01-10 08:49 PM |
#65 |
| -
I think so too. If Obama doesn't think like the repubs he's obviously bought by the same people. |
craigmatic |
Dec-01-10 08:50 PM |
#66 |
| -
pretty much |
ibegurpard |
Dec-01-10 09:32 PM |
#67 |
| -
Well, I agree with your premise - that he is neither naive nor weak... and he is doing what he means |
jefferson_dem |
Dec-01-10 10:12 PM |
#69 |
Printer-friendly format
Email this thread to a friend
Bookmark this thread