Posteritatis
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Nov-28-10 04:15 PM
Response to Reply #14 |
| 16. Most of this stuff was leaked near the end of his term anyway |
|
You can't blame people for not releasing information in 2004 when they only got it in 2007 or 2008.
|
| -NYT: A Note to Readers: The Decision to Publish Diplomatic Documents |
ProSense |
Nov-28-10 01:31 PM |
#0 |
 -
Admirable, and nice to explain it to the readers, but the info will |
gateley |
Nov-28-10 01:34 PM |
#1 |
| -
end of article |
tabatha |
Nov-28-10 01:36 PM |
#2 |
 -
We needed a little more of that |
ProSense |
Nov-28-10 01:39 PM |
#3 |
 -
The NY Times broke the warrentless wiretapping story |
MannyGoldstein |
Nov-28-10 02:03 PM |
#12 |
| -
The NYT also produced Judith Miller. n/t |
ProSense |
Nov-28-10 02:14 PM |
#13 |
| -
And they fired her, and her editor, and apologized |
MannyGoldstein |
Nov-28-10 06:16 PM |
#18 |
| -
Where was that concern during the Bush days? |
impik |
Nov-28-10 03:26 PM |
#14 |
| -
Most of this stuff was leaked near the end of his term anyway |
Posteritatis |
Nov-28-10 04:15 PM |
#16 |
| -
A well considered set of responses ... |
Trajan |
Nov-28-10 01:39 PM |
#4 |
| -
When Cheney, Libby, and Rove did this it was an outrage... |
Ozymanithrax |
Nov-28-10 01:42 PM |
#5 |
| -
"In reality there is not a planck leangth of difference." |
eShirl |
Nov-28-10 01:50 PM |
#6 |
| -
It is taking calssified informatino and revcealing for political purposes. |
Ozymanithrax |
Nov-28-10 01:57 PM |
#8 |
| -
We really don't know who's behind this: my guess would be the recent State Department stuff |
struggle4progress |
Nov-28-10 01:54 PM |
#7 |
| -
A lot this stuff, like the Iraq stuff.. goes back before Obama. |
Ozymanithrax |
Nov-28-10 02:00 PM |
#9 |
| -
But I'm sure there's far more damning stuff pointing to Reagan and Bush |
gateley |
Nov-28-10 02:03 PM |
#11 |
| -
Good point! nt |
gateley |
Nov-28-10 02:01 PM |
#10 |
| -
What on earth is a "planck leangth" ... and when did Cheney, Libby and |
BlueMTexpat |
Nov-29-10 10:14 AM |
#23 |
| -
Thank you for the explanation. I was trying to see the |
midnight |
Nov-29-10 11:21 AM |
#24 |
| -
There are lots of events in diplomacy that are very sensitive, |
BlueMTexpat |
Nov-30-10 07:59 AM |
#25 |
| -
They never would have done this when Bush was President. |
Radical Activist |
Nov-28-10 03:33 PM |
#15 |
| -
Totally agree. They were afraid of Bush, they aren't afraid of Obama. |
harun |
Nov-28-10 05:14 PM |
#17 |
| -
Why? Because he doesn't threat them? Because he actually believe in the freedom of press? |
impik |
Nov-28-10 07:14 PM |
#19 |
| -
Striking fear in to the hearts of Republican's and the Press isn't being like B*sh |
harun |
Nov-28-10 08:55 PM |
#21 |
| -
I agree with you. Also absent during the bush years was any curiosity |
de novo |
Nov-28-10 07:23 PM |
#20 |
| -
If they have to explain their decision, it obviously wasn't something |
Phx_Dem |
Nov-29-10 09:14 AM |
#22 |
Printer-friendly format
Email this thread to a friend
Bookmark this thread