liskddksil
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Nov-12-10 07:22 AM
Response to Reply #5 |
| 28. That was Mark Penn..not Shrum |
|
Shrum was responsible for Kerry's 2004 campaign.
|
| -Barack Obama will be back on top |
ProSense |
Nov-11-10 10:07 PM |
#0 |
-
I would love to read this |
bluestateguy |
Nov-11-10 10:11 PM |
#1 |
-
Serwer sums it up... |
Clio the Leo |
Nov-11-10 10:14 PM |
#2 |
 -
I agree with this. The same could have been said for the Dems chances |
de novo |
Nov-11-10 10:28 PM |
#3 |
  -
"Just hoping that jobs are created isn't enough" |
ProSense |
Nov-11-10 10:45 PM |
#8 |
 -
150,000 is a drop in the bucket. Yes, it is finally in the right direction. |
de novo |
Nov-11-10 10:47 PM |
#10 |
  -
Who said it had to gain it all back? |
ProSense |
Nov-11-10 10:50 PM |
#12 |
 -
Define "significant improvement". |
de novo |
Nov-11-10 10:50 PM |
#13 |
  -
Unemployment |
ProSense |
Nov-11-10 10:55 PM |
#14 |
 -
I disagree. 8-8.5% will not be seen a resounding success. |
de novo |
Nov-11-10 10:57 PM |
#15 |
 -
You can disagree, |
ProSense |
Nov-11-10 10:59 PM |
#16 |
 -
lol. I can't wait to see the campaign ads proudly touting 8.5% unemployment. |
de novo |
Nov-11-10 11:01 PM |
#17 |
 -
You do realize |
ProSense |
Nov-11-10 11:06 PM |
#18 |
 -
Yeah, but... |
de novo |
Nov-12-10 12:06 AM |
#23 |
 -
What does that mean? |
ProSense |
Nov-12-10 12:52 AM |
#25 |
 -
Here |
ProSense |
Nov-12-10 01:13 AM |
#26 |
 -
significant improvement? |
paulk |
Nov-13-10 11:11 PM |
#44 |
 -
150k = net 0 jobs |
jeff47 |
Nov-11-10 11:19 PM |
#20 |
 -
150K > -800K |
ProSense |
Nov-11-10 11:38 PM |
#22 |
 -
9.6% unemployment = 9.6% unemployment |
jeff47 |
Nov-12-10 07:04 AM |
#27 |
 -
2010 is not 2012 |
ProSense |
Nov-12-10 09:32 AM |
#30 |
 -
Once again, you're completely ignoring the point |
jeff47 |
Nov-12-10 10:07 AM |
#32 |
 -
People are upset at |
ProSense |
Nov-11-10 10:48 PM |
#11 |
-
"Tongue in cheek, Sabato & Abramowitz mock pundits predicting that Obama will lose re-election" |
Pirate Smile |
Nov-11-10 10:34 PM |
#4 |
 -
EXACTLY, The 90's are comming BACK! |
Dr Fate |
Nov-13-10 04:21 PM |
#42 |
-
You're quoting the guy responsible for Hillary losing the primary |
jeff47 |
Nov-11-10 10:42 PM |
#5 |
 -
Is that supposed to be a bad thing? n/t |
ProSense |
Nov-11-10 10:43 PM |
#6 |
  -
Only if you value competence. |
girl gone mad |
Nov-11-10 10:45 PM |
#7 |
   -
Competence lost? |
ProSense |
Nov-11-10 10:46 PM |
#9 |
  -
Only if you're trusting his political advice...like when quoting him. (nt) |
jeff47 |
Nov-11-10 11:17 PM |
#19 |
 -
That was Mark Penn..not Shrum |
liskddksil |
Nov-12-10 07:22 AM |
#28 |
-
Didn't she fire Shrum and retain Penn when things started going against her? |
jeff47 |
Nov-12-10 02:03 PM |
#37 |
-
The economy will recover... |
KeyserSoze87 |
Nov-11-10 11:25 PM |
#21 |
-
I hope he's correct and Obama rebounds |
rpannier |
Nov-12-10 12:29 AM |
#24 |
-
Good for him. |
rug |
Nov-12-10 07:41 AM |
#29 |
-
At what Friggin' Price this Victory? |
displacedvermoter |
Nov-12-10 09:43 AM |
#31 |
-
I would listen to Shrum. He has shown that he knows how to WIN. n/t |
Dr Fate |
Nov-12-10 11:03 AM |
#33 |
 -
When? |
displacedvermoter |
Nov-12-10 12:08 PM |
#36 |
-
and a new Congress will ride in on his coattails... |
Aramchek |
Nov-12-10 11:04 AM |
#34 |
-
Name one time when Bob Shrum has been right in the past 12 years. |
COLGATE4 |
Nov-12-10 11:46 AM |
#35 |
 -
I trust Shrums word more than yours. n/t |
jaysunb |
Nov-12-10 03:06 PM |
#39 |
  -
Me too. Shrum=Right about A LOT. Far left= wrong on everything. |
Dr Fate |
Nov-13-10 03:54 PM |
#41 |
 -
Name one time that he has been wrong. |
Dr Fate |
Nov-13-10 03:53 PM |
#40 |
-
Nice that President Obama will be back on top . . . |
h9socialist |
Nov-12-10 02:25 PM |
#38 |
-
It's very basic there is up ,,,, or down. Even if up is a bumpy road with Dems it's STILL up. |
DemocraticPilgrim |
Nov-13-10 10:56 PM |
#43 |
-
K&R...nt |
SidDithers |
Nov-14-10 10:04 AM |
#45 |