You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #15: Yeah, he didn't try a hair brained strategy. [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU
Radical Activist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-07-10 04:30 PM
Response to Reply #14
15. Yeah, he didn't try a hair brained strategy.
Edited on Thu Oct-07-10 04:33 PM by Radical Activist
Even if it was mistake, they were using a political strategy that makes more sense. That doesn't mean there was some secret plan to sabotage what they had spent months fighting for.

You wrote: "When 70% of the public supports a public option, it should not be too terribly difficult to convince politicians to listen to the overwhelming majority of their constituents."

Then why didn't the Senate support it? Obviously it was that hard. Maybe it would have helped for progressives groups to focus on the Senate more instead of whining about Obama.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
  -Will the President do a better job without Rahm Emanuel ?? kentuck  Oct-07-10 03:10 PM   #0 
  - You have a stronger "faith" than I  zipplewrath   Oct-07-10 03:18 PM   #1 
  - +1  depakid   Oct-08-10 09:37 AM   #21 
  - We can only hope. nt  RaleighNCDUer   Oct-07-10 03:20 PM   #2 
  - beat me to it - those were going to be my words  DrDan   Oct-07-10 03:20 PM   #3 
     - Mine as well. n/t  MuseRider   Oct-07-10 04:51 PM   #16 
  - I hope but dare not put all my chips in this basket.  YOY   Oct-07-10 03:21 PM   #4 
  - Is there any evidence that Rahm would have supported signing that bill?  Radical Activist   Oct-07-10 03:22 PM   #5 
  - Who advised Obama to prevent even a mention of single-payer, and  RaleighNCDUer   Oct-07-10 03:33 PM   #9 
     - Common sense and the Senate.  Radical Activist   Oct-07-10 03:40 PM   #11 
        - If he had backed single-payer, he could have 'let' them back him down  RaleighNCDUer   Oct-07-10 03:51 PM   #12 
           - That's a fairy tail.  Radical Activist   Oct-07-10 04:04 PM   #13 
              - Well, we will never know  RaleighNCDUer   Oct-07-10 04:10 PM   #14 
                 - Yeah, he didn't try a hair brained strategy.  Radical Activist   Oct-07-10 04:30 PM   #15 
                 - Why didn't the Senate support it?  RaleighNCDUer   Oct-08-10 09:05 AM   #20 
                 - The biggest gun was US THE PEOPLE!  Radical Activist   Oct-08-10 12:44 PM   #29 
                 - Amen, this contingent refuses to accept that the structure of the  treestar   Oct-08-10 10:49 AM   #25 
                    - They're being very easily manipulated  Radical Activist   Oct-08-10 12:47 PM   #30 
                 - how the fuck do you really know what he did or didn't do? because you didn't read it on DU?  dionysus   Oct-08-10 09:51 AM   #22 
                 - Ah, it's all in the public record. You know, speeches and stuff?  RaleighNCDUer   Oct-08-10 10:15 AM   #23 
                 - I love North Carolina.  joe black   Oct-08-10 10:54 AM   #27 
  - Only if you believe he was controlled by Rahm.  rug   Oct-07-10 03:23 PM   #6 
  - Hope So. But being in Campaign Season Obama must Pretend to be Progressive.  denimgirly   Oct-07-10 03:23 PM   #7 
  - So much backhand negativity in the light of good news.  FrenchieCat   Oct-07-10 03:24 PM   #8 
  - I really believe he will.  Chan790   Oct-07-10 03:39 PM   #10 
  - False premise.... the President has been doing an excellent job...  scheming daemons   Oct-07-10 05:42 PM   #17 
  - +Infinity. n/t  vaberella   Oct-07-10 05:53 PM   #18 
  - The President has been in charge all along ...  frazzled   Oct-07-10 06:02 PM   #19 
  - I never understood the obsession with Rahm  treestar   Oct-08-10 10:47 AM   #24 
  - No  joe black   Oct-08-10 10:50 AM   #26 
  - For whom? The Republicans or the Democrats? It's a fine line.  Joe Chi Minh   Oct-08-10 11:13 AM   #28 
 

Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC