Radical Activist
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Oct-07-10 07:49 PM
Response to Reply #39 |
| 42. You're lying. The statement said he's opposed to the bill for issue reasons, not procedural. |
|
Edited on Thu Oct-07-10 07:49 PM by Radical Activist
He didn't sign it because "Consumer financial protections are incredibly important, and he has made this one of his top priorities" and because of that he's against the "intended and unintended impact of this bill on consumer protections."
It's very clear. Obama won't sign the bill because he's protecting consumers. He used gentle language to avoid offending Congress but the message is still obvious.
But then, as you say, only actions matter. Right? Except when Obama does something good I guess.
|
| -While you are all worried about a fire, the middle and lower class are about the get screwed again! |
Better Today |
Oct-06-10 07:44 PM |
#0 |
 -
thousands of people are about to lose their houses, |
provis99 |
Oct-06-10 07:46 PM |
#1 |
  -
Exactly right. Him and a witch girl, seems our side has trouble focusing |
Better Today |
Oct-06-10 08:20 PM |
#12 |
| -
And more, while they couldn't seem to pass middle class tax cut before |
Better Today |
Oct-06-10 07:47 PM |
#2 |
| -
Amazing how they can pass this in a big fat hurry, shows who owns Congress. |
NC_Nurse |
Oct-06-10 07:48 PM |
#3 |
| -
Amazing when you consider how the procedure, no debate, |
tsuki |
Oct-07-10 08:10 AM |
#22 |
| -
WTF! Why in the world would the President sign that!!!??????????????? |
BrklynLiberal |
Oct-06-10 07:54 PM |
#4 |
| -
He hasn't signed anything yet. It was sent for his signature. I hope he vetos it |
Kdillard |
Oct-06-10 08:00 PM |
#8 |
| -
Based on his decisions to date, I hold no hope. Add to that the fact |
Better Today |
Oct-06-10 08:09 PM |
#9 |
| -
I hope your hope is now rekindled. |
Radical Activist |
Oct-07-10 04:43 PM |
#30 |
| -
and you would be wrong |
rufus dog |
Oct-07-10 08:19 PM |
#47 |
| -
spankety spank spank Now you gona git it! |
lonestarnot |
Oct-07-10 09:47 PM |
#57 |
| -
I trust he will veto it. |
Xenotime |
Oct-07-10 04:42 PM |
#29 |
| -
... |
AzDar |
Oct-06-10 07:55 PM |
#5 |
| -
Why are you cursing Obama? This thing should have died like before |
Kdillard |
Oct-06-10 07:57 PM |
#6 |
| -
First I cursed "them" or more exactly "'em", not Obama specifically. Your more important |
Better Today |
Oct-06-10 08:21 PM |
#13 |
| -
"unusual display of bipartisanship" |
pa28 |
Oct-06-10 07:58 PM |
#7 |
| -
"Judiciary Committee Chairman Patrick Leahy pressed to have the bill rushed through " |
ProSense |
Oct-06-10 08:13 PM |
#10 |
| -
We can only hope that our pundits and our forum brings this to the fore and |
Better Today |
Oct-06-10 08:15 PM |
#11 |
| -
Daily Kos published Jennifer Brunner's call to action on it |
Waiting For Everyman |
Oct-07-10 05:03 AM |
#19 |
| -
Leahy??? nt |
flamingdem |
Oct-07-10 04:33 PM |
#26 |
| -
Son of a bitch! |
lonestarnot |
Oct-06-10 10:46 PM |
#14 |
| -
He could pocket veto it by not signing it, right? |
704wipes |
Oct-06-10 10:51 PM |
#15 |
| -
It's not that simple... |
depakid |
Oct-07-10 06:52 AM |
#20 |
| -
It is that simple. Obama killed it. |
Radical Activist |
Oct-07-10 04:39 PM |
#28 |
| -
No it's not that simple at all- and sure enough, he did go for the having it both ways/hallf a loaf |
depakid |
Oct-07-10 06:36 PM |
#39 |
| -
There's no two ways about it. He killed it. |
Radical Activist |
Oct-07-10 07:31 PM |
#40 |
| -
That's a false assertion |
depakid |
Oct-07-10 07:40 PM |
#41 |
| -
You're lying. The statement said he's opposed to the bill for issue reasons, not procedural. |
Radical Activist |
Oct-07-10 07:49 PM |
#42 |
| -
Gibb's statement says exactly what it says. Stamping your feet about it or making accusations |
depakid |
Oct-07-10 08:09 PM |
#44 |
| -
Well then I sugest you stop stamping your feet n/t |
POAS |
Oct-07-10 08:11 PM |
#45 |
| -
I just quoted the man directly |
depakid |
Oct-07-10 08:22 PM |
#48 |
| -
And then you grossly misrepresented the quote. |
Radical Activist |
Oct-07-10 08:29 PM |
#50 |
| -
You seem to have difficulty with reading comprehension |
depakid |
Oct-07-10 08:30 PM |
#51 |
| -
I'll repost the words for those whose minds are not closed by bitter partisanship. |
Radical Activist |
Oct-07-10 08:34 PM |
#52 |
| -
That's not what he said! |
depakid |
Oct-07-10 08:55 PM |
#53 |
| -
I used direct quotes from the official statement. |
Radical Activist |
Oct-07-10 08:59 PM |
#54 |
| -
No you've tried unsuccessfully to spin it into something else! |
depakid |
Oct-07-10 09:16 PM |
#55 |
| -
"Why President Obama is Not Signing H.R. 3808" |
Radical Activist |
Oct-07-10 10:04 PM |
#58 |
| -
This is ridiculous. |
Radical Activist |
Oct-07-10 08:16 PM |
#46 |
| -
More accusation and ad hominems won't make the statement and action here different either |
depakid |
Oct-07-10 08:27 PM |
#49 |
| -
Yep. Looks like dat is the plan stan. |
lonestarnot |
Oct-07-10 09:45 PM |
#56 |
| -
wow. amazing how these kind of things get fast tracked while things that might |
Hannah Bell |
Oct-07-10 01:08 AM |
#16 |
| -
K&R n/t |
Mimosa |
Oct-07-10 01:47 AM |
#17 |
| -
double down |
Hannah Bell |
Oct-07-10 02:38 AM |
#18 |
| -
You must be thrilled to see Obama do the right thing |
Radical Activist |
Oct-07-10 04:37 PM |
#27 |
| -
You don't think this is a help to people? Why? eom |
JuniperLea |
Oct-07-10 04:58 PM |
#33 |
| -
I have to wonder, what else is in this thing? |
PVnRT |
Oct-07-10 07:19 AM |
#21 |
| -
It's a "your crime is now legal card" for the banksters. |
Waiting For Everyman |
Oct-07-10 08:14 AM |
#23 |
| -
Obama not signing this. |
Greyskye |
Oct-07-10 04:07 PM |
#24 |
| -
My President did not disappoint... |
elizm |
Oct-07-10 04:23 PM |
#25 |
| -
The Statler and Waldorf caucus assumed the worst about Obama, again. |
Radical Activist |
Oct-07-10 04:46 PM |
#31 |
| -
You'd think they'd get tired of being outraged by rumors & gossip, but they live for it. |
Tarheel_Dem |
Oct-07-10 04:56 PM |
#32 |
| -
I disagree... |
JuniperLea |
Oct-07-10 04:59 PM |
#34 |
| -
lol |
Radical Activist |
Oct-07-10 05:01 PM |
#35 |
| -
the spank-ee in that emoticon... |
JuniperLea |
Oct-07-10 05:03 PM |
#36 |
| -
In my experience |
Radical Activist |
Oct-07-10 05:07 PM |
#37 |
| -
It comes from an addiction to preemptive outrage. |
azmouse |
Oct-07-10 06:24 PM |
#38 |
| -
Yep |
HughMoran |
Oct-07-10 07:57 PM |
#43 |
Printer-friendly format
Email this thread to a friend
Bookmark this thread