Reply #73: Wrong. You asserted these conditions where a fact. Facts don't call for "if's", facts are

[TheKentuckian]

Facts are established. Your entire argument was predicated on a conditional presented as a certainty and now you have the brazen audacity to get huffy that your claims are questioned. Your tactics are transparent and pitiful.

If wishes were fishes then we'd all cast our nets.

There are few if any indicators of less need (nor that current levels of need are satisfied) in the foreseeable future. Again, the need is intense and growing every single week as the 99ers lose all means of support and wages flatline, so we should certainly be scrambling to find ways to bolster the program rather than using it as a piggybank for other programs.

At best, this is sending the wrong message and makes any thought of more resources a topic that is off the table.