You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login

Reply #43: I noticed that you are responding in this thread. [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU
rhett o rick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-10-10 07:39 PM
Response to Reply #1
43. I noticed that you are responding in this thread.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
  -Short-Sighted - Why do some liberals refuse to admit Obama is a change agent? impik  Jul-10-10 03:36 PM   #0 
  - Our President has achieved extraordinary accomplishments  NJmaverick   Jul-10-10 03:38 PM   #1 
  - no one fails to notice the big hole he started in  Skittles   Jul-10-10 03:43 PM   #2 
  - I would disagree, you can climb to great heights and still be in the hole  NJmaverick   Jul-10-10 03:45 PM   #3 
  - I think it must be nice to live in the clouds  Skittles   Jul-10-10 04:09 PM   #7 
     - You should reach for the stars  NJmaverick   Jul-10-10 04:12 PM   #8 
        - easier when you live in the clouds  Skittles   Jul-10-10 05:04 PM   #23 
           - I wouldn't know  NJmaverick   Jul-10-10 05:08 PM   #24 
           - Hey Skittles  jaysunb   Jul-10-10 05:29 PM   #26 
              - Excellent post!  johnaries   Jul-10-10 10:57 PM   #55 
              - he could have done better than this  Skittles   Jul-10-10 11:24 PM   #56 
              - Some people like yourself surely feel that way  NJmaverick   Jul-11-10 08:24 AM   #70 
              - excellent post jay  SunsetDreams   Jul-11-10 01:00 AM   #59 
              - Yeah, but it's more fun to throw a knee-jerk, panty-twisting tirade.  ChimpersMcSmirkers   Jul-11-10 01:06 AM   #61 
  - +1  Phx_Dem   Jul-10-10 06:23 PM   #34 
  - If Obama noticed the big hole, why did he promise so much? nm  rhett o rick   Jul-10-10 07:40 PM   #44 
     - because people bought it  Skittles   Jul-10-10 11:24 PM   #57 
     - He has fullfilled 119 promises in just 18 months  NJmaverick   Jul-11-10 08:10 AM   #65 
  - Not only has he failed to keep his promises, he no longer even promises them.  rhett o rick   Jul-10-10 05:29 PM   #25 
  - You claim couldn't be more incorrect, here are the FACTS  NJmaverick   Jul-10-10 05:31 PM   #27 
  - I am so glad you are satisfied. Those losing their jobs, homes and health insurance  rhett o rick   Jul-10-10 05:44 PM   #30 
     - It's all Obama's fault!  Political Tiger   Jul-10-10 07:08 PM   #38 
     - Do you even think that is a way of discussion? It is definitely not all Pres Obama's fault.  rhett o rick   Jul-10-10 07:37 PM   #42 
     - 119 promises kept in only 18 months is very impressive  NJmaverick   Jul-11-10 08:11 AM   #66 
  - Can't get past 'allowing BP to enforce martial law."  treestar   Jul-10-10 07:23 PM   #40 
     - So you support the Pres allowing BP to dictate who can see the damage, who can fly over,  rhett o rick   Jul-10-10 07:45 PM   #45 
        - How do you conclude that?  treestar   Jul-10-10 09:34 PM   #50 
           - Ok, so maybe i exagerated to make a point. What's your point? BP has been excercizing  rhett o rick   Jul-10-10 10:35 PM   #51 
  - I noticed that you are responding in this thread.  rhett o rick   Jul-10-10 07:39 PM   #43 
  - Deleted message  Name removed   Jul-10-10 03:47 PM   #4 
  - Deleted message  Name removed   Jul-10-10 04:27 PM   #15 
  - Some had trouble even accepting he's President, let alone giving  firedupdem   Jul-10-10 03:55 PM   #5 
  - Liberal racism is alive and well  impik   Jul-10-10 04:29 PM   #18 
  - Send those big bucks!!  pocoloco   Jul-10-10 05:38 PM   #29 
  - The tea party was not born out of frustration with Obama .......  Exilednight   Jul-10-10 04:03 PM   #6 
  - I don't think anyone knew the repubs would vote NO on everything.  jaxx   Jul-10-10 04:13 PM   #9 
  - anybody with half a brain who witnessed how they treated Clinton  jonnyblitz   Jul-10-10 04:26 PM   #14 
  - Exactly. And Clinton was a white male. Did anyone REALLY think a black man  Nay   Jul-10-10 04:44 PM   #20 
  - If anyone thought the republicans would do anything other than stonewall, they  rhett o rick   Jul-10-10 05:37 PM   #28 
  - They SAID they would say no  Hydra   Jul-10-10 06:50 PM   #35 
     - Speaking of sharp knives...............  jaxx   Jul-10-10 10:36 PM   #52 
        - Heh  Hydra   Jul-11-10 12:40 AM   #58 
        - And Dick Cheney would be so proud of the way some Obama supporters like to fear monger .......  Exilednight   Jul-11-10 01:55 PM   #88 
  - Very good post  LostinVA   Jul-10-10 04:40 PM   #19 
  - Seriously?  SkyDaddy7   Jul-10-10 05:58 PM   #32 
  - Seriously. Let's take HCR as an example ..........  Exilednight   Jul-10-10 06:16 PM   #33 
     - Do you honestly think...  SkyDaddy7   Jul-10-10 06:51 PM   #36 
        - Here's a poll that say Americans wanted a PO........  Exilednight   Jul-10-10 08:47 PM   #46 
           - LOL  KeyWester   Jul-11-10 09:18 AM   #79 
  - I Agree  Steely_Dan   Jul-11-10 11:37 AM   #82 
  - Well, if the "change" is that list of "accomplishments" that Rahm Emanuel brags about  Sebastian Doyle   Jul-10-10 04:14 PM   #10 
  - Progressive critics of Obama really need to read Jonathan Alter's book 'The Promise'.  Diane R   Jul-10-10 04:15 PM   #11 
  - Yea, they should. No, they won't. It will kill their narrative, and who wants that  impik   Jul-10-10 04:28 PM   #16 
  - So you claim the Tea Party was born from a rational reaction  Bluenorthwest   Jul-10-10 04:16 PM   #12 
  - "When you find yourself framing the Tea Nuts as reality based..."  Zenlitened   Jul-10-10 05:04 PM   #22 
  - Too Reality Based to accpet the marketing on Blind Faith?  bvar22   Jul-10-10 04:20 PM   #13 
  - The accomplishments have been extraordinary  NJmaverick   Jul-10-10 04:29 PM   #17 
  - He's done the best he could considering what he has to work with.  great white snark   Jul-10-10 04:53 PM   #21 
  - Deleted message  Name removed   Jul-10-10 05:54 PM   #31 
  - Maybe Tom Tomorrow can give TNR a clue:  depakid   Jul-10-10 07:03 PM   #37 
  - Oh no you didn't!  bvar22   Jul-10-10 07:08 PM   #39 
  - Good One  Dinger   Jul-10-10 07:36 PM   #41 
  - So well articulated reason should be countered with a cartoon  NJmaverick   Jul-11-10 09:15 AM   #78 
     - Do you forget that you triumphantly posted a cartoon yourself a week ago?  spoony   Jul-11-10 12:57 PM   #86 
  - The Tea Party movement was born of frustration that a black man is president.  GodlessBiker   Jul-10-10 08:55 PM   #47 
  - Because the change isn't enough to save us, and will eventually prove insignificant...  Orsino   Jul-10-10 08:58 PM   #48 
  - That's my feeling as well.  martymar64   Jul-11-10 09:31 AM   #80 
  - Mmm, reheated talking points.  spoony   Jul-10-10 09:32 PM   #49 
  - Amazing....On a site dedicated to supporting Democrats and getting them elected....  scheming daemons   Jul-10-10 10:43 PM   #53 
  - I know this might be hard to understand for some  Sebastian Doyle   Jul-10-10 10:56 PM   #54 
  - Then go and work to get a green President, or Socialist  treestar   Jul-11-10 09:00 AM   #75 
     - Apparently you flunked reading comprehension in junior high?  Sebastian Doyle   Jul-11-10 12:27 PM   #84 
  - Not amazing in a thread dedicated to bashing liberal Democrats.  EFerrari   Jul-11-10 05:12 AM   #62 
  - Why not address the issue?  NJmaverick   Jul-11-10 08:22 AM   #69 
     - The OP raises no "issue"  spoony   Jul-11-10 12:53 PM   #85 
  - K&R  SunsetDreams   Jul-11-10 01:01 AM   #60 
  - How silly is it to use tea klanners to bash Democrats.  EFerrari   Jul-11-10 05:14 AM   #63 
  - The New Republic ...  GeorgeGist   Jul-11-10 06:49 AM   #64 
  - If you can't address the message  NJmaverick   Jul-11-10 08:22 AM   #68 
  - In fairness you attack messengers all the time.  tekisui   Jul-11-10 08:46 AM   #72 
     - Wouldn't your accusation fall under the heading  NJmaverick   Jul-11-10 08:55 AM   #73 
        - Nope.  tekisui   Jul-11-10 08:56 AM   #74 
           - I would have to strongly disagree with both of your posts  NJmaverick   Jul-11-10 09:02 AM   #76 
  - TNR also strongly supported US entry into WWI.  bornskeptic   Jul-11-10 11:28 AM   #81 
  - Oh, he's changed things alright, just not necessarily for the better  MadHound   Jul-11-10 08:14 AM   #67 
  - You state a rather strong and radical opinon  NJmaverick   Jul-11-10 09:11 AM   #77 
     - So in each and every thread every poster must list, in detail,  spoony   Jul-11-10 01:01 PM   #87 
  - If I had a nickle  davidpdx   Jul-11-10 08:42 AM   #71 
  - I think this perception of (no) change depends on one's priorities.  ZombieHorde   Jul-11-10 12:19 PM   #83 
  - I don't know.  branders seine   Jul-11-10 04:05 PM   #89 
  - Because he's the agent of neoliberal change, not leftist change. nt  LWolf   Jul-11-10 04:07 PM   #90 

Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators

Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC