You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

"Dems Introduce Stand-Alone Unemployment Insurance Bill" - OpenCongress.Org.... [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU
CrownPrinceBandar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-28-10 03:08 PM
Original message
"Dems Introduce Stand-Alone Unemployment Insurance Bill" - OpenCongress.Org....
Advertisements [?]
"The American Jobs and Closing Tax Loopholes Act (H.R.4213), which would have extended unemployment insurance benefits, closed some tax loopholes and more, was officially abandoned last week after the Democrats failed to overcome a Republican filibuster for the third time. As a result, over a million uninsured people have had their unemployment insurance benefits cut off since they expired on June 2. But while the Democrats may have lost hope of ever passing H.R. 4213, they have recently introduced a new bill for the sole purpose of extending unemployment benefits.

The new bill, the Unemployment Insurance Extension Act of 2010, is just three-pages long and does just one thing extend the filing deadline for extended unemployment benefits to the end of the year. It was introduced by Sen. Debbie Ann Stabenow (pictured), and has four Democratic co-sponsors. Sen. Olympia Snowe has also said she would support such a bill, suggesting that the it could have at least some bi-partisan support, though not necessarily enough to pass. With the passing of Sen. Robert Byrd and with Sen. Ben Nelson saying last week he would vote against any UI bill that isnt fully offset with new revenues, the Democrats would need at least 2 more Republicans besides Snowe to cross the aisle and vote with them if they are to have the 60 votes they will need to overcome an inevitable Republican filibuster. Additionally, Democrats may be concerned the bill could give Republicans the chance to kill Senate time that the Democrats would like to spend on other issues.

At this moment, its uncertain whether this new bill will be voted on this week. The Democrats could call it up for unanimous consent passage at any point, but that would be blocked by Republicans. If they try to move it under regular order, Republicans could easily use Senate rules to drag the debate out for several days, or even weeks, and Congress is scheduled to leave for a week-long recess on Friday..." (emphasis mine)

http://www.opencongress.org/articles/view/1944-Dems-Int...

According to this website, quoting the Bureau of Labor Statistics, if there is no extension, the unemployed cut off from their benefits could reach 2 million by July 10 if nothing is done soon. And meanwhile, Sen. Nelson is singing the same tune again, and Congress pines for its week-long recess while Americans suffer. Why can't this be passed as emergency spending? I'd say the potential of 2 million folks losing any help they have coming in qualifies as an emergency!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC