You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #74: You are absolutely correct on that...when a dirty nuke hits US [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU
golfguru Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-27-10 12:39 AM
Response to Reply #16
74. You are absolutely correct on that...when a dirty nuke hits US
it's origins will be traced back to Pakistan, not Iran nor Iraq nor N. Korea.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
  -Why we are in Afghanistan berni_mccoy  Jun-24-10 01:56 AM   #0 
  - I've been trying to get this through to people for a while now  Chulanowa   Jun-24-10 02:09 AM   #1 
  - Exactly.  vaberella   Jun-24-10 03:21 AM   #3 
  - berni where you been?! Missed your posts. This is actually why I am on the fence with this war.  vaberella   Jun-24-10 03:20 AM   #2 
  - Been taking shelter in the Barrack Obama Group, staying away from the hate  berni_mccoy   Jun-24-10 09:03 AM   #17 
     - I am really glad to see you back. Your knowledge of political...  kjackson227   Jun-24-10 10:43 AM   #27 
  - Mineral resources...  depakid   Jun-24-10 03:28 AM   #4 
  - Those were given to Japan.  JTFrog   Jun-24-10 06:38 AM   #8 
  - LOL- no, they weren't  depakid   Jun-24-10 07:00 AM   #9 
     - It's certainly what Karzai and Japan have been saying...  JTFrog   Jun-24-10 07:10 AM   #10 
        - Without delving further into the deals, who makes money and geopolitical spheres of influence  depakid   Jun-24-10 07:49 AM   #11 
           - I'll admit to not knowing much about Japan or China being a proxy for the US.  JTFrog   Jun-24-10 08:08 AM   #12 
              - That's part of it  depakid   Jun-24-10 08:19 AM   #14 
  - + Oil & Gas  donheld   Jun-24-10 11:26 PM   #50 
  - Bush Doctrine. Whoo hoo!  VMI Dem   Jun-24-10 04:25 AM   #5 
  - 'tis the white man's burden to protect the lowly savages by  Warren Stupidity   Jun-24-10 04:56 AM   #6 
  - Almost ten years. Ten long years.  cali   Jun-24-10 06:00 AM   #7 
  - Almost 9 years under Bush. Only a year and a half under Obama.  berni_mccoy   Jun-24-10 08:57 AM   #15 
     - Bush? Who is this "Bush"?  Chulanowa   Jun-24-10 10:43 AM   #28 
  - Thanks, Berni for the information. Some think it is so easy...  kjackson227   Jun-24-10 08:14 AM   #13 
  - LBJ hated the war from the beginning  Enrique   Jun-24-10 09:35 AM   #22 
  - I hope so, too. But, I trust Obama to get us out earlier, if possible...  kjackson227   Jun-24-10 10:41 AM   #26 
  - It amazes me how many Monday Morning Quarterbacks  goclark   Jun-27-10 12:18 AM   #73 
  - Don't forget the nuclear weapons in destabilizing Pakistan.  Nicholas D Wolfwood   Jun-24-10 08:58 AM   #16 
  - You are absolutely correct on that...when a dirty nuke hits US  golfguru   Jun-27-10 12:39 AM   #74 
  - yes, that's the reason for all our wars  Enrique   Jun-24-10 09:21 AM   #18 
  - I'm not sure why you draw that conclusion. That's not what got us there.  berni_mccoy   Jun-24-10 09:24 AM   #19 
     - the name of the war was Operation Enduring Freedom  Enrique   Jun-24-10 09:31 AM   #21 
        - That's pretty flawed logic basing the reason for the invasion on the name of the operation  berni_mccoy   Jun-24-10 09:42 AM   #24 
        - actually, we only went there gto kill Bin laden. You remember him right  mkultra   Jun-24-10 06:34 PM   #44 
  - We're there for the children.  rug   Jun-24-10 09:25 AM   #20 
  - LOL  Tutankhamun   Jun-24-10 09:28 PM   #47 
  - Heart string tugging distraction  TheKentuckian   Jun-24-10 09:38 AM   #23 
  - You missed the point. It's not a heart-string argument. Read "Three Cups of Tea"...  berni_mccoy   Jun-24-10 10:28 AM   #25 
  - I'm surprised you waste your time posting here  pscot   Jun-24-10 10:42 PM   #48 
  - At the expense of Social Security? In a trade off at the expense of our own infrastructure?  TheKentuckian   Jun-25-10 08:41 AM   #58 
  - +1000 n/t  jeanpalmer   Jun-26-10 01:01 AM   #70 
  - You souldn't use the plight of Afghanistan women as an excuse for  tekisui   Jun-24-10 10:45 AM   #29 
  - You didn't read it, did you? See my response #25 above.  berni_mccoy   Jun-24-10 10:51 AM   #30 
     - I read it.  tekisui   Jun-24-10 10:53 AM   #31 
        - You can't educate them when the Taliban and AQ are gassing the schools  berni_mccoy   Jun-24-10 11:08 AM   #33 
           - And how do we know when it is safe for us to leave?  tekisui   Jun-24-10 11:11 AM   #34 
           - The same questions were asked about Iraq.  berni_mccoy   Jun-24-10 11:32 AM   #35 
           - I wouldn't point to a thing about Iraq as helping your argument.  tekisui   Jun-24-10 01:41 PM   #36 
              - That's pretty much it.  Robeson   Jun-24-10 06:39 PM   #45 
              - +1000 and while we continue to allocate huge sums of this nations  bluethruandthru   Jun-25-10 01:08 PM   #67 
           - It will be safe for us to leave when we're knee-deep in some other  sad sally   Jun-26-10 10:58 PM   #71 
           - It's hard to educate dead women and children also.  sabrina 1   Jun-24-10 05:51 PM   #39 
              - Maybe you just need to look at it from a different perspective.  noamnety   Jun-24-10 10:59 PM   #49 
                 - And I'm sick of hearing the "NATO loves bombing wedding parties" nonsense.  Robb   Jun-25-10 10:50 AM   #62 
                    - selective memory  noamnety   Jun-25-10 01:35 PM   #68 
                       - Fortunately for you, I'm quite familiar with these events.  Robb   Jun-25-10 03:23 PM   #69 
  - Rec'd.  treestar   Jun-24-10 11:03 AM   #32 
  - Deleted message  Name removed   Jun-24-10 03:30 PM   #37 
  - Maybe we should let the people of Afghanistan speak for  sabrina 1   Jun-24-10 05:23 PM   #38 
  - Col. Kurtz on why we will leave Afghanistan without 'winning'  maxsolomon   Jun-24-10 06:01 PM   #40 
  - That man sounds like he needs some serious  sabrina 1   Jun-24-10 06:24 PM   #42 
     - Well, he was fictional, but the point was that Evil is relative  maxsolomon   Jun-24-10 07:05 PM   #46 
        - Thanks.  sabrina 1   Jun-25-10 12:56 AM   #54 
  - We are in Afghanistan because Obama chose to escalate a losing war  IndianaGreen   Jun-24-10 06:05 PM   #41 
  - Deleted message  Name removed   Jun-24-10 06:26 PM   #43 
  - The Subject Line Was Promising  Moochy   Jun-24-10 11:37 PM   #51 
  - We have to accept the fact that the world operates differently than it ought  LittleBlue   Jun-24-10 11:47 PM   #52 
  - The Taliban is our own Frankenstein's Monster inflicted on the Afghans. We need to kill it.  Odin2005   Jun-25-10 12:03 AM   #53 
  - 30 years of war have done nothing good for afghanistan  bhikkhu   Jun-25-10 01:03 AM   #55 
  - Well-placed campaign-based TRIANGULATION ---  smalll   Jun-25-10 03:06 AM   #56 
  - Here is the post in favor of DLC Triangulation  Moochy   Jun-25-10 10:24 AM   #60 
  - Hey I have seen this argument for the war before  spiritual_gunfighter   Jun-25-10 03:25 AM   #57 
  - The poster loves to recycle  Moochy   Jun-25-10 10:22 AM   #59 
  - What pretzel logic for continuing Bush's policies n/t  Catherina   Jun-25-10 10:38 AM   #61 
  - It's like saying we need to make shit not smell bad  zulchzulu   Jun-25-10 11:16 AM   #63 
  - we are there for the time being cause like in Viet Nam in the mid sixties it is considered way too  Douglas Carpenter   Jun-25-10 11:18 AM   #64 
  - Get.The. Fuck. Out. Now.  Autumn   Jun-25-10 12:44 PM   #65 
  - Education may have been  alsame   Jun-25-10 12:54 PM   #66 
  - If we are actually fighting the Taliban then it should be easy  Rosa Luxemburg   Jun-26-10 11:04 PM   #72 
 

Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC