Unvanguard
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu May-27-10 09:49 PM
Response to Reply #8 |
| 16. Because loyalty requires that we STFU about things that will be ridiculously overblown. |
|
If we had a rational media climate and political situation, you'd be right. But we don't.
|
| -Does Sestak have a right to be pissed? |
KansasVoter |
May-27-10 09:33 PM |
#0 |
 -
He's a selfish fuck who doesn't deserve the nomination. he threw his pres under the bus for polical |
LeftyAndProud60 |
May-27-10 09:34 PM |
#1 |
 -
Why did Sestak even have to tell about this deal if he knew it would hurt Obama. |
jillan |
May-27-10 09:36 PM |
#4 |
| -
becuz he knew it could help him win. That's all he cared about. NT |
LeftyAndProud60 |
May-27-10 09:44 PM |
#11 |
 -
then if he gets into the Senate where would he be, too? |
treestar |
May-28-10 09:05 AM |
#55 |
| -
He was supposed to lie? Or dodge the question? |
MH1 |
May-29-10 07:18 PM |
#76 |
| -
I voted for him, but if this gets much worse I'll start regretting it. n/t |
Unvanguard |
May-27-10 09:37 PM |
#6 |
| -
Oh that's way over the top. Sestak is a retired Admiral and, to me, an as honorable person |
ShortnFiery |
May-27-10 09:38 PM |
#7 |
| -
This went on under Bush, and I didn't care about it then. NT |
LeftyAndProud60 |
May-27-10 09:45 PM |
#13 |
| -
I don't blame him for stating given the SIT: The entire ruling democratic "establisment" had ... |
ShortnFiery |
May-27-10 09:52 PM |
#17 |
| -
Agreed! nt. |
freddie mertz |
May-28-10 07:52 AM |
#49 |
| -
Was he unqualified for the position? |
treestar |
May-28-10 09:06 AM |
#56 |
| -
Right, Sestak is selfish, as opposed to the Obama Administration... |
Chef Eric |
May-28-10 06:02 AM |
#41 |
| -
+ 1000000. And thank god they lost, and lost big. nt. |
freddie mertz |
May-28-10 07:53 AM |
#50 |
| -
Well now if he wins, he is going to have very little influence |
treestar |
May-28-10 09:09 AM |
#57 |
| -
The same president who threw HIM first under the bus? |
Beacool |
May-28-10 09:10 AM |
#58 |
| -
the President has the right to support someone else |
treestar |
May-28-10 09:12 AM |
#60 |
| -
Tue, but Sestak was entitled to run despite the administration's objections. |
Beacool |
May-28-10 09:20 AM |
#62 |
| -
He was entitled to and did |
treestar |
May-28-10 09:29 AM |
#64 |
| -
I agree, I don't much care either. |
Beacool |
May-28-10 10:05 AM |
#67 |
| -
Support? Of course! Quid pro quo? I am not so sure. n/t |
golfguru |
May-29-10 07:43 PM |
#85 |
| -
Self delete, wrong spot. |
Beacool |
May-28-10 09:14 AM |
#61 |
| -
I strongly disagree. They threw *HIM* under the bus by supporting a fake Democrat/Republican |
Liberal_Stalwart71 |
May-29-10 09:00 AM |
#74 |
| -
Exactly. |
MH1 |
May-29-10 07:21 PM |
#78 |
| -
Oh bullshit. WH is the one who approached him with a deal he would never take |
MH1 |
May-29-10 07:19 PM |
#77 |
| -
Why did Sestak go public about the job offer from WH? |
golfguru |
May-29-10 07:39 PM |
#84 |
| -
Every administration since George Washington has offered jobs for political reasons |
scheming daemons |
May-27-10 09:35 PM |
#2 |
| -
And Sestak would've been QUALIFIED for the job, unlike anyone BUSH offered jobs to. n/t |
jenmito |
May-27-10 09:43 PM |
#10 |
| -
I agree. But Specter is a bad candidate for age and health reasons. He'd lose in November. nt |
Captain Hilts |
May-27-10 10:00 PM |
#20 |
| -
This was more ham-handed, needed more winks and nods |
marshall |
May-28-10 07:27 AM |
#46 |
| -
Sestak is a real progressive? n/t |
countingbluecars |
May-27-10 09:35 PM |
#3 |
| -
I don't care whether he was angry, or whether he had a right to be angry. |
Unvanguard |
May-27-10 09:36 PM |
#5 |
| -
Why should he be quiet? Because political POWER trumps TRUTH? |
ShortnFiery |
May-27-10 09:42 PM |
#8 |
| -
Because loyalty requires that we STFU about things that will be ridiculously overblown. |
Unvanguard |
May-27-10 09:49 PM |
#16 |
| -
He was in the middle of a contested primary where the democratic establishment had |
ShortnFiery |
May-27-10 10:24 PM |
#22 |
| -
Oh, he doesn't owe anything to THEM specifically. |
Unvanguard |
May-27-10 10:28 PM |
#23 |
| -
Politics may be hardball but this isn't the f**king mafia. |
ShortnFiery |
May-27-10 10:36 PM |
#28 |
| -
It's not ABOUT him and his offended feelings, justified or not. |
Unvanguard |
May-27-10 10:38 PM |
#29 |
| -
No, our enemy is the marriage of government and corporations, not just the GOP. |
ShortnFiery |
May-27-10 10:44 PM |
#32 |
| -
I think you got him throught the heart, Shorty.... |
PassingFair |
May-29-10 10:23 AM |
#75 |
| -
+1000 n/t |
golfguru |
May-29-10 07:45 PM |
#86 |
| -
loyalty for the sake of loyalty is for idiots |
DatManFromNawlins |
May-28-10 03:44 AM |
#35 |
| -
what I don't understand |
OhioBlue |
May-27-10 10:34 PM |
#26 |
| -
Exactly! n/t |
Unvanguard |
May-27-10 10:36 PM |
#27 |
| -
There was ZERO loyalty to Sestak when he was left hung out to dry by establishment democrats. |
ShortnFiery |
May-27-10 10:46 PM |
#33 |
| -
Oh bullshit |
AllentownJake |
May-28-10 05:35 AM |
#39 |
| -
Sestak didn't 'try to make an issue out of it' |
MH1 |
May-29-10 07:27 PM |
#82 |
| -
Toomey is not going to win...Sestak's stock went up a lot |
golfguru |
May-29-10 07:50 PM |
#87 |
| -
Damn, I Wish I Had Your Nerve |
Dinger |
May-29-10 08:53 AM |
#73 |
| -
Thank you for your sanity. |
MH1 |
May-29-10 07:26 PM |
#81 |
| -
Right to be pissed why? |
Drunken Irishman |
May-27-10 09:42 PM |
#9 |
| -
The WH wi. the Democratic Establishment did their best to make Sestak obselete and we all know it. |
ShortnFiery |
May-27-10 09:49 PM |
#15 |
| -
so what? |
Teaser |
May-27-10 10:40 PM |
#31 |
| -
Because his constituents should choose their Senator |
DatManFromNawlins |
May-28-10 03:50 AM |
#36 |
| -
I voted for Arlen |
AllentownJake |
May-28-10 05:39 AM |
#40 |
| -
make me fucking care. |
Teaser |
May-28-10 07:14 AM |
#44 |
| -
No-he's playing games. He should either tell the whole story or NONE of it. n/t |
jenmito |
May-27-10 09:45 PM |
#12 |
| -
I hated Specter, but he really did become a reliable Dem. And w/ the votes he made, there is no |
LeftyAndProud60 |
May-27-10 09:47 PM |
#14 |
| -
Are you kidding? Specter is, and always has been a republican at heart. |
ShortnFiery |
May-27-10 09:54 PM |
#18 |
| -
He had become a Democrat and would have been a reliable vote |
treestar |
May-28-10 09:10 AM |
#59 |
| -
And his age and health would ensure he'd lose in November. nt |
Captain Hilts |
May-27-10 09:59 PM |
#19 |
| -
I haven't decided who was the stupid idiot yet - Sestak or the White House |
stray cat |
May-27-10 10:13 PM |
#21 |
| -
Obama brought in the Sultan of Sleaze |
HCE1947 |
May-27-10 10:28 PM |
#24 |
| -
Another Rahm is the devil rant |
leftynyc |
May-28-10 10:41 AM |
#68 |
| -
Sestack tried to be a Teatard withour realizing he made his own trap |
zulchzulu |
May-27-10 10:33 PM |
#25 |
| -
Why should anyone care? |
Teaser |
May-27-10 10:40 PM |
#30 |
| -
No. He was offered a job. They didn't threaten to kill his dog. |
Orangepeel |
May-27-10 11:38 PM |
#34 |
| -
Not only has he no right to be pissed, but he should be tarred and feathered and... |
TreasonousBastard |
May-28-10 05:22 AM |
#37 |
| -
Sestak is a walking train wreck |
AllentownJake |
May-28-10 05:30 AM |
#38 |
| -
My surmisals |
Phoebe Loosinhouse |
May-28-10 06:33 AM |
#42 |
| -
OK, my sumisals were wrong on almost every count. |
Phoebe Loosinhouse |
May-28-10 10:46 AM |
#69 |
| -
Don't fall into the trap - Sestak didn't blow anything up, it is the right wingers |
MH1 |
May-29-10 07:30 PM |
#83 |
| -
He should disclose who bribed him and send (rham) to jail.. |
mdmc |
May-28-10 06:36 AM |
#43 |
| -
Bribed?!?!?! |
Inuca |
May-28-10 07:21 AM |
#45 |
| -
You know, Specter himself pretty much told Sestak to "put up or shut up" |
Phoebe Loosinhouse |
May-28-10 07:45 AM |
#47 |
| -
Yes, he did. But he outfoxed them and cleaned their clock. |
freddie mertz |
May-28-10 07:49 AM |
#48 |
| -
I KNOW I Heard The "Job" Story Some Time Ago & My Reaction Was |
ChiciB1 |
May-28-10 08:30 AM |
#51 |
| -
Sestak is a Center-Right Opportunist |
WeDidIt |
May-28-10 08:32 AM |
#52 |
| -
Just how many Admirals are progressives? |
olegramps |
May-28-10 09:02 AM |
#53 |
| -
Is he a real progressive? |
treestar |
May-28-10 09:04 AM |
#54 |
| -
Oh, the outrage!!!! |
Beacool |
May-28-10 09:22 AM |
#63 |
| -
No, but neither does the White House or Democrats in general |
TheKentuckian |
May-28-10 09:50 AM |
#65 |
| -
I'm LATE With My Kudos "Kentuckian" But I Agree With What You're Saying! n/t |
ChiciB1 |
May-29-10 08:35 AM |
#72 |
| -
i don't care about their feelings |
Enrique |
May-28-10 09:58 AM |
#66 |
| -
Absolutely not. He stupidly started the whole thing and it blew up in his face. |
Phx_Dem |
May-28-10 12:36 PM |
#70 |
| -
No, THEY started it. |
MH1 |
May-29-10 07:23 PM |
#80 |
| -
Usual suspects in a flame thread n/t |
catgirl |
May-28-10 01:27 PM |
#71 |
| -
Yep. :) |
MH1 |
May-29-10 07:22 PM |
#79 |
Printer-friendly format
Email this thread to a friend
Bookmark this thread