Liberal_Stalwart71
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon May-24-10 07:07 PM
Response to Original message |
| 2. Looks like we need to put our trust in Nancy. She said that she would work to end |
|
DADT by the end of this year. Let's see what happens.
|
| -Obama endorses 'don't ask, don't tell' compromise in congress. DADT is over!!!!! |
stevenleser |
May-24-10 07:05 PM |
#0 |
 -
DADT is not over yet |
WeDidIt |
May-24-10 07:06 PM |
#1 |
| -
Looks like we need to put our trust in Nancy. She said that she would work to end |
Liberal_Stalwart71 |
May-24-10 07:07 PM |
#2 |
 -
Write letters to Nancy in support of |
Cha |
May-24-10 07:10 PM |
#4 |
| -
Today they were reporting that the House is the harder push on this vote, not the Senate. |
Pirate Smile |
May-24-10 07:10 PM |
#5 |
| -
Many Blue Dogs are retiring. Their votes can be gotten. |
bluestateguy |
May-24-10 07:13 PM |
# |
| -
That doesn't surprise me because House districts tend to be more ideologically homogenous |
Liberal_Stalwart71 |
May-24-10 07:15 PM |
#7 |
 -
Nancy Can Count Votes and She Knows Which Buttons to Push |
PopSixSquish |
May-24-10 10:33 PM |
#27 |
| -
Obama did give the Pentagon a December deadline. |
Radical Activist |
May-25-10 10:24 AM |
#54 |
| -
It is? |
bluestateguy |
May-24-10 07:08 PM |
#3 |
| -
Exactly |
Teka |
May-25-10 12:06 PM |
#68 |
| -
Looks like Nancy was telling the truth. |
Arkana |
May-24-10 07:13 PM |
#6 |
| -
Has Nancy lied yet?! That's my girl. n/t |
vaberella |
May-25-10 05:01 AM |
#39 |
| -
No, she was spot-on that "Impeachment has been taken off of the table." eom |
ShortnFiery |
May-25-10 05:09 AM |
#42 |
| -
What President was impeachment even on the table for? |
vaberella |
May-25-10 05:32 AM |
#43 |
| -
She could have done this ... she could be hailed as the LEADER who helped to save the |
ShortnFiery |
May-25-10 05:53 AM |
#45 |
| -
As for the first part, she's done a great deal to be hailed as a LEADER. |
vaberella |
May-25-10 10:05 AM |
#51 |
| -
Here's a good one from the vault: |
bvar22 |
May-25-10 11:05 AM |
#63 |
| -
Seems like that is happening. Another promise fulfilled. Thanks for pointing that out |
stevenleser |
May-25-10 11:20 AM |
#65 |
| -
Oh Yes! |
bvar22 |
May-25-10 11:32 AM |
#66 |
| -
They made a positive move to end the war in Iraq. |
vaberella |
May-26-10 01:18 AM |
#89 |
| -
Except that they haven't. Reality contradicts your post. |
bvar22 |
May-26-10 10:36 AM |
#91 |
| -
it is NOT over yet - they can study it for 20 years, Obama could suspend all |
msongs |
May-24-10 07:16 PM |
#8 |
| -
and he didn't call in Aquaman either. |
Teaser |
May-24-10 07:34 PM |
#9 |
| -
Please see my links for the anti-Obama naysayers below. |
stevenleser |
May-24-10 08:10 PM |
#17 |
| -
No, they cannot. Please see this link. The Secretary of Defense has mandated 12/1/2010 as the end |
stevenleser |
May-24-10 10:51 PM |
#29 |
| -
My guess is that this is face-saving for the Pentagon. |
backscatter712 |
May-25-10 10:27 AM |
#56 |
| -
Is he going to suspend the dismissals while the Pentagon does all that studying? |
QC |
May-24-10 07:36 PM |
#10 |
| -
Me too |
Proud Liberal Dem |
May-24-10 07:46 PM |
#11 |
| -
He can suspend dismissals right this second |
Prism |
May-25-10 02:53 PM |
#82 |
| -
"not so much" |
Nicholas D Wolfwood |
May-25-10 09:17 AM |
#47 |
| -
glad to see you've already deemed it a Bad Thing (tm) |
dionysus |
May-25-10 09:25 AM |
#50 |
| -
Yes, perhaps we should total up how many dismissals would occur from 2011 on without a repeal? |
stevenleser |
May-25-10 11:19 AM |
#64 |
| -
Deleted message |
Name removed |
May-25-10 12:08 PM |
#69 |
| -
Deleted message |
Name removed |
May-25-10 01:31 PM |
#72 |
| -
Deleted message |
Name removed |
May-25-10 01:39 PM |
#74 |
| -
Progress... |
jefferson_dem |
May-24-10 07:51 PM |
#12 |
| -
Some links for the anti-Obama naysayers... |
stevenleser |
May-24-10 07:53 PM |
#13 |
| -
Cue responses saying it is too little, too late |
treestar |
May-24-10 07:59 PM |
#14 |
| -
Yep, |
Political Tiger |
May-24-10 09:00 PM |
#20 |
| -
What do we do in the interem? |
zipplewrath |
May-24-10 08:00 PM |
#15 |
| -
People unrec this???? Lame losers, Obama drink your milkshake. |
impik |
May-24-10 08:07 PM |
#16 |
| -
I know, don't count chickens, but still, THIS IS AWESOME NEWS!!! |
backscatter712 |
May-24-10 08:27 PM |
#18 |
| -
Rachel Maddow reported it as "Breaking News" about 15 min. ago! K&R. |
jenmito |
May-24-10 08:59 PM |
#19 |
| -
Recommend - about damn time. First step but a good one. Nt |
xchrom |
May-24-10 09:26 PM |
#21 |
| -
almost... |
HughMoran |
May-24-10 09:28 PM |
#22 |
| -
YES! But I'm sure it's not over yet. There are some in the Pentagon |
johnaries |
May-24-10 09:32 PM |
#23 |
| -
Nope, the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs is on board |
stevenleser |
May-24-10 10:21 PM |
#26 |
| -
I hope you are right. I don't doubt that the Chairman is on board, |
johnaries |
May-24-10 11:31 PM |
#31 |
| -
Yeah, I think that might be a *tad* premature. |
SemiCharmedQuark |
May-24-10 09:35 PM |
#24 |
| -
It's pretty much a done deal |
stevenleser |
May-24-10 09:45 PM |
#25 |
| -
No more than half a year? |
boppers |
May-24-10 10:42 PM |
#28 |
| -
Yes, 12/1/2010 is the last possible date for study. See this directive |
stevenleser |
May-24-10 10:52 PM |
#30 |
| -
Deleted message |
Name removed |
May-25-10 01:07 AM |
#36 |
| -
Deleted message |
Name removed |
May-25-10 10:33 AM |
#58 |
| -
So, "Compromise" is now defined as "Over"? |
lynne |
May-24-10 11:37 PM |
#32 |
| -
The "compromise" is only on the timeline. |
Nicholas D Wolfwood |
May-25-10 09:17 AM |
#48 |
| -
k/r |
tranche |
May-25-10 12:12 AM |
#33 |
| -
Deleted message |
Name removed |
May-25-10 12:19 AM |
#34 |
| -
Deleted message |
Name removed |
May-25-10 10:35 AM |
#59 |
| -
It's not over until they vote on it. |
SpartanDem |
May-25-10 12:50 AM |
#35 |
| -
I hope so. DADT could be the first domino to fall. And then, the others will. |
political_Dem |
May-25-10 02:38 AM |
#37 |
| -
All that pressure we were told not to apply is working? |
Prism |
May-25-10 02:50 AM |
#38 |
| -
Deleted sub-thread |
Name removed |
May-25-10 09:18 AM |
#49 |
| -
And all the accusations that Obama abandoned the issue and would never do anything. |
Radical Activist |
May-25-10 10:27 AM |
#55 |
| -
Oh lord, they had to back him into a corner to get sideways movement |
Prism |
May-25-10 01:39 PM |
#75 |
| -
Obama never backed off doing it his year. |
Radical Activist |
May-25-10 02:08 PM |
#77 |
| -
I pay attention to this issue outside of how it relates to the President's PR |
Prism |
May-25-10 02:32 PM |
#79 |
| -
Publicly called out? |
Radical Activist |
May-25-10 02:36 PM |
#80 |
| -
There certainly is |
Prism |
May-25-10 02:49 PM |
#81 |
| -
“We all look forward to the report on the review of the ‘Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell’ policy" |
Radical Activist |
May-25-10 02:56 PM |
#83 |
| -
"Some of us believe in advocacy without misleading exaggerations. Join us, won't you?" |
stevenleser |
May-25-10 03:03 PM |
#84 |
| -
Deleted sub-thread |
Name removed |
May-25-10 05:01 PM |
#85 |
| -
It was a public repudiation |
Prism |
May-25-10 05:05 PM |
#86 |
| -
Obama has been saying THIS year for a long while. |
Radical Activist |
May-26-10 09:55 AM |
#90 |
| -
And yes, |
Radical Activist |
May-26-10 10:37 AM |
#92 |
| -
I do not - and have never - understood DADT. |
Vinca |
May-25-10 05:05 AM |
#40 |
| -
It was a Clinton-era political compromise on the issue that completely backfired. |
backscatter712 |
May-25-10 10:54 AM |
#61 |
| -
Alot |
zipplewrath |
May-25-10 01:47 PM |
#76 |
| -
Don't hold your breath. I won't believe it until IT HAPPENS. eom |
ShortnFiery |
May-25-10 05:08 AM |
#41 |
| -
This is your second post like this on a similar thread. |
vaberella |
May-25-10 05:48 AM |
#44 |
| -
OK, this also applies to your side. |
ShortnFiery |
May-25-10 05:55 AM |
#46 |
| -
What side? I only posted a response to your post and another on Nancy P. |
vaberella |
May-25-10 10:06 AM |
#53 |
| -
ah, the posting police. |
robinblue |
May-25-10 12:12 PM |
#71 |
| -
This is pretty big, actually. I hate Lieberman, he is my Senator. But he may |
Jennicut |
May-25-10 10:05 AM |
#52 |
| -
Seeing that they've announced a deal... |
backscatter712 |
May-25-10 10:29 AM |
#57 |
| -
Exactly, it's over. All over, that is, except for the hand wringing of those who are upset at |
stevenleser |
May-25-10 10:36 AM |
#60 |
| -
Uh, NOTHING significant with regard to legislation has happened yet. |
ShortnFiery |
May-25-10 10:56 AM |
#62 |
| -
Sorry "ignored" I cannot read your response. n/t |
stevenleser |
May-25-10 01:34 PM |
#73 |
| -
It will be harder in the Senate almost certainly. |
Unvanguard |
May-25-10 02:14 PM |
#78 |
| -
K&R, woohoo !!! |
SunsetDreams |
May-25-10 11:52 AM |
#67 |
| -
We'll see. |
donco6 |
May-25-10 12:11 PM |
#70 |
| -
This is a tad premature. |
racaulk |
May-25-10 05:29 PM |
#87 |
| -
One big question is whether the Senate Repugs will try to filibuster... |
DCBob |
May-25-10 06:01 PM |
#88 |
Printer-friendly format
Email this thread to a friend
Bookmark this thread