You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #53: Why would she? [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU
Synicus Maximus Donating Member (828 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-06-10 09:02 PM
Response to Original message
53. Why would she?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
  -Queen has to approve of the parliament before it can sit? She's been dictator longer than F Castro. Mika  May-06-10 04:58 PM   #0 
  - Mere formality  WeDidIt   May-06-10 04:59 PM   #1 
  - Neither did Castro. n/t  Mika   May-06-10 05:00 PM   #3 
     - LOL, you sound like a LaRouchy.  WeDidIt   May-06-10 05:10 PM   #11 
  - That's nominal  KingFlorez   May-06-10 05:00 PM   #2 
  - It's a formality  Prophet 451   May-06-10 05:01 PM   #4 
  - "Its a formality" That's what everyone said about Castro too.  Mika   May-06-10 05:03 PM   #6 
  - Dude, you're obsessed with this idea  Prophet 451   May-06-10 05:09 PM   #10 
     - Pssssst  WeDidIt   May-06-10 05:11 PM   #12 
        - Ah, thanks for the heads-up n/t  Prophet 451   May-06-10 05:15 PM   #18 
        - This is awesome satire  Oregone   May-06-10 06:00 PM   #38 
           - I'm expecting the OP to break out wiht the ole LaRouchy meme of  WeDidIt   May-06-10 07:08 PM   #46 
  - What happens if she declines?  SlipperySlope   May-06-10 05:11 PM   #13 
     - Constitutional crisis  Prophet 451   May-06-10 05:15 PM   #17 
     - The monarchy would die that day.  WeDidIt   May-06-10 05:18 PM   #20 
        - Almost certainly  Prophet 451   May-06-10 05:21 PM   #23 
        - +1  Nicholas D Wolfwood   May-07-10 09:15 AM   #72 
  - Different norms in the UK.  backscatter712   May-06-10 05:03 PM   #5 
  - That's what Cubans (in Cuba) say about Castro. n/t  Mika   May-06-10 05:04 PM   #7 
     - That's the comparison Lyndon LaRouche makes  WeDidIt   May-06-10 05:11 PM   #14 
     - You're like a broken record.  Blue-Jay   May-06-10 05:32 PM   #29 
     - What do you have against Muskrat Love?  boppers   May-06-10 06:34 PM   #42 
     - The last time the Crown tried to usurp Parliament...  backscatter712   May-06-10 05:44 PM   #34 
        - The monarch also has almost zero actual power  Prophet 451   May-06-10 05:52 PM   #36 
           - Exactly. That's how the norms are in the UK.  backscatter712   May-06-10 10:26 PM   #60 
              - Pretty good recap  Prophet 451   May-07-10 10:57 AM   #89 
              - and in America  awoke_in_2003   May-07-10 06:16 PM   #108 
  - It's a tradition. Like a President supporting shitty, unacceptable encumbents.  VMI Dem   May-06-10 05:05 PM   #8 
  - "Dictator?" Oy. Read a book. (nt)  Posteritatis   May-06-10 05:06 PM   #9 
  - The OP did.... Spot ran... Spot ran fast!  whistler162   May-07-10 06:31 AM   #69 
  - She can also dissolve it. Not only in the UK, but in Australia and Canada, too.  cbayer   May-06-10 05:12 PM   #15 
  - Again, a formality  Prophet 451   May-06-10 05:18 PM   #21 
  - She can, but elections have to follow.  sarge43   May-06-10 05:19 PM   #22 
     - IIRC  Prophet 451   May-06-10 05:22 PM   #24 
     - IIRC, Charles II shut it down, 350 years ago.  sarge43   May-06-10 05:25 PM   #25 
        - You might be right  Prophet 451   May-06-10 05:28 PM   #27 
        - I think Good Queen Bess chose to ignore parliament whenever she could  sarge43   May-06-10 05:37 PM   #32 
        - And that was a direct result of the English Civil War  WeDidIt   May-06-10 05:38 PM   #33 
        - Sort-of  Prophet 451   May-06-10 05:48 PM   #35 
        - I didn't work out too well for him  malletgirl02   May-07-10 02:41 AM   #64 
           - Chuck II was one of the few Stuarts who managed to die in bed at home.  sarge43   May-07-10 07:50 PM   #110 
              - Thanks  malletgirl02   May-08-10 09:35 AM   #121 
     - November 11, 1975  depakid   May-06-10 06:44 PM   #43 
        - Thanks for the information. n/t  sarge43   May-06-10 07:16 PM   #47 
  - What do you mean by 'approve'?  muriel_volestrangler   May-06-10 05:13 PM   #16 
  - Oh please. If HM even thought about screwing with Parliament,  sarge43   May-06-10 05:16 PM   #19 
  - Her exploits when she seized power during that bloody revolution were particularly notorious.  HiFructosePronSyrup   May-06-10 05:26 PM   #26 
  - ROTFL!  CitizenLeft   May-06-10 07:01 PM   #44 
  - I forget,  dflprincess   May-06-10 09:26 PM   #54 
  - Well done!  boppers   May-07-10 05:34 PM   #106 
  - That is their system not ours. If the British arn't kicken' about it, why should we...  Ozymanithrax   May-06-10 05:29 PM   #28 
  - She also has no command authority over the armed forces. n/t  sarge43   May-06-10 05:34 PM   #30 
  - Wish him well?  proteus_lives   May-06-10 09:58 PM   #57 
  - Of course they should. That doesn't mean I bear Fidel any ill will.  Ozymanithrax   May-06-10 10:11 PM   #58 
     - I agree, there have been a lot of good things done in Cuba.  proteus_lives   May-07-10 02:45 AM   #65 
     - I never said Fidel was a saint...but he is not the devil he is made out to be...  Ozymanithrax   May-07-10 10:57 AM   #88 
     - No, the collapse of the huge Soviet subsidy has "crushed" Cuba's economy. nt  Captain Hilts   May-07-10 10:53 AM   #82 
        - Cuba was subsidized because of a U.S. embargo that denied them...  Ozymanithrax   May-07-10 10:58 AM   #91 
           - Castro hosted a conference of Lat Leaders in the mid-80s in which he held Cuba  Captain Hilts   May-07-10 10:59 AM   #93 
              - But it still existed. In fact, it remains in place to this day. n/t  Ozymanithrax   May-07-10 11:02 AM   #95 
                 - I don't agree with the embargo, but it only became a problem after the Soviet subsidy ended. nt  Captain Hilts   May-07-10 11:09 AM   #98 
  - But it _should_ be mocked  dbmk   May-07-10 03:46 AM   #67 
     - We elected GEorge W. Bush twice. I'd rather have a useless and pathetic queen...n/t  Ozymanithrax   May-07-10 11:00 AM   #94 
        - Then he would just had been Prime Minister. nt.  dbmk   May-07-10 08:52 PM   #113 
           - I remember an interesting point made in favor of constitutional monarchy.  smitra   May-07-10 09:14 PM   #114 
  - Well, it's a well known fact, Sonny Jim  Blue-Jay   May-06-10 05:35 PM   #31 
  - "He puts an addictive chemical in his chicken"  awoke_in_2003   May-07-10 06:36 PM   #109 
     - More info on The Pentavirate:  Blue-Jay   May-07-10 08:22 PM   #111 
        - guess I need to rent that one....  awoke_in_2003   May-07-10 08:29 PM   #112 
  - Some OPz are weirder than others - and this is pretty weird -  xchrom   May-06-10 05:52 PM   #37 
  - The Westminster system itself can get pretty wierd  depakid   May-06-10 07:07 PM   #45 
     - All political systems are pretty weird.  sarge43   May-06-10 07:21 PM   #48 
  - She doesn't dictate anything, ya know.  elleng   May-06-10 06:00 PM   #39 
  - That's what THE CUBANS would like you to think!  Blue-Jay   May-06-10 06:02 PM   #40 
  - unlike castro and his pscho buddy che the queen will not murder 1000's of opponents nt  msongs   May-06-10 06:23 PM   #41 
  - Seems as though you forgot about Iraq.  Billy Burnett   May-06-10 07:27 PM   #49 
  - HRH had bugger all to do with that  Prophet 451   May-06-10 08:28 PM   #52 
  - True. And, supposedly, no one went toe to toe with Thatcher more than Liz. nt  Captain Hilts   May-07-10 10:54 AM   #83 
  - I think if the queen refused, the pols would just ignore her.  Old Troop   May-06-10 07:29 PM   #50 
  - BINGO!!! nt  lordcommander   May-06-10 07:33 PM   #51 
  - Why would she?  Synicus Maximus   May-06-10 09:02 PM   #53 
  - She wouldn't.  sarge43   May-06-10 09:50 PM   #55 
  - How many people has the Queen herded into a field and shot?  proteus_lives   May-06-10 09:56 PM   #56 
  - As many as Fidel did, 0.  harun   May-07-10 10:42 AM   #79 
     - You believe that about old Fidel?  proteus_lives   May-07-10 02:38 PM   #101 
  - I don't think she likes the Tories  Rosa Luxemburg   May-06-10 10:19 PM   #59 
  - No, she doesn't like the Tories. And she roots for West Ham in Premier league.  Captain Hilts   May-07-10 10:56 AM   #84 
  - an interesting post  tomm2thumbs   May-06-10 10:30 PM   #61 
  - It really is just a formality  Prophet 451   May-07-10 11:02 AM   #96 
  - I agree that it's harmless but a monarchy is seriously fucked up.  Hosnon   May-06-10 10:39 PM   #62 
  - It is  dbmk   May-07-10 03:28 AM   #66 
  - "Either she can wield the power or she cannot"  Prophet 451   May-07-10 11:04 AM   #97 
     - Then hopefully she tries.  Hosnon   May-07-10 04:45 PM   #103 
     - Opinions vary  Prophet 451   May-08-10 06:39 AM   #120 
        - It's definitely up to the people of the U.K.  Hosnon   May-08-10 10:40 AM   #122 
     - Then why not get it over with?  dbmk   May-07-10 09:30 PM   #115 
        - I can live with it  Prophet 451   May-08-10 06:28 AM   #119 
  - Tell that to the UK tourist industry  jberryhill   May-07-10 09:39 AM   #76 
     - I don't deny the appeal - the monarchy has to nurture it to remain in control.  Hosnon   May-07-10 10:12 AM   #77 
        - I agree  jberryhill   May-07-10 10:33 AM   #78 
           - Good point. And if they do exist, they've been sent through the "Fairy Tale" machine.  Hosnon   May-07-10 10:42 AM   #80 
              - Well, when you go on the castle tour...  jberryhill   May-07-10 10:56 AM   #85 
  - What an incredible display of blissful ignorance about another country  Hekate   May-07-10 02:16 AM   #63 
  - "God Save The Queen...And Her Fascist Regime..." Sex Pistols. nt  old mark   May-07-10 06:16 AM   #68 
  - The difference is that the Queen hasn't imprisoned any governments she didn't like...  RollWithIt   May-07-10 08:44 AM   #70 
  - The deification of Castro never ceases to entertain me. nt  Captain Hilts   May-07-10 10:57 AM   #90 
  - Talk about gross lack of knowledge of the British governmental system  hobbit709   May-07-10 09:04 AM   #71 
  - AND ignorance of Cuba's history. nt  Captain Hilts   May-07-10 10:56 AM   #86 
     - +1  harun   May-07-10 03:14 PM   #102 
  - This is a perfect example of what happens when limited intelligence meets interesting factoids. (nt)  Nicholas D Wolfwood   May-07-10 09:16 AM   #73 
  - BRILLIANT comment!  Captain Hilts   May-07-10 10:57 AM   #87 
  - Hee. (nt)  Posteritatis   May-07-10 12:00 PM   #99 
  - That's what constitutional monarchies do  supernova   May-07-10 09:23 AM   #74 
  - Thats basically the UK system in a nutshell..Period nt  lordcommander   May-07-10 09:27 AM   #75 
  - And as long as the head of state..  dbmk   May-07-10 09:51 PM   #117 
  - Yes, but Liz isn't the egotistical megalomaniac that Castro is. nt  Captain Hilts   May-07-10 10:52 AM   #81 
  - Having a monarchy in this day and age seems kind of silly. But this OP is sillier.  fishwax   May-07-10 10:59 AM   #92 
  - Ain't that the truth.  quiller4   May-07-10 02:33 PM   #100 
  - Agreed. But in defense of the OP, it started a good discussion here about how  Hosnon   May-07-10 04:52 PM   #104 
  - Oh, that's an easy call.  boppers   May-07-10 05:46 PM   #107 
  - Yup.... but try convincing  whistler162   May-07-10 09:40 PM   #116 
     - Convinced.  Hosnon   May-08-10 10:41 AM   #123 
  - Stop showing your ignorance  GCP   May-07-10 05:19 PM   #105 
  - Mika... quit while you're behind... this OP is full of fail...  scheming daemons   May-07-10 10:00 PM   #118 
  - Its very unlikely the monarchy will ever excercise any ruling against public will the Queen has  cooolandrew   May-09-10 02:02 PM   #124 
  - We'll see what this guy has to say about it first!  Ikonoklast   May-09-10 04:13 PM   #125 
 

Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC