girl gone mad
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Apr-28-10 09:35 PM
Response to Reply #73 |
| 84. Public opinion shifted long ago. |
|
Edited on Wed Apr-28-10 09:37 PM by girl gone mad
The fact is that 100 to 1 calls against the bailouts didn't stop Obama from lobbying the Senate to get it done.
Public opinion may have shifted, but the administration continues to be a fierce advocate for a supply-side pro-corporatist Reaganomic/Rubinomic agenda.
|
| -Obama's #1 Contributor - 656 million from WE THE PEOPLE. |
phleshdef |
Apr-28-10 12:35 AM |
#0 |
-
Thank you. NT |
Clio the Leo |
Apr-28-10 12:45 AM |
#1 |
-
Facts and reading comprehension make people cry. |
Starbucks Anarchist |
Apr-28-10 12:46 AM |
#2 |
 -
So, we owe George Bush an apology then? |
sabrina 1 |
Apr-28-10 11:20 PM |
#92 |
-
even if true, it's sad; Obama has reneged on campaign promises and dismissed the people's wishes |
amborin |
Apr-28-10 12:49 AM |
#3 |
 -
If you want to change the topic to argue about that BS, make your own thread. |
phleshdef |
Apr-28-10 12:50 AM |
#5 |
  -
I just REC'D your OP ... |
NanceGreggs |
Apr-28-10 03:01 AM |
#20 |
 -
You just did. |
Cha |
Apr-28-10 11:31 AM |
#38 |
 -
Head. Nail. On the. |
WheelWalker |
Apr-28-10 07:21 PM |
#74 |
 -
Yeah ok. Or not. |
NYC Liberal |
Apr-28-10 01:24 AM |
#10 |
 -
NO, check the fine print? It will permit large banks to absorb both smaller ones and credit unions. |
ShortnFiery |
Apr-28-10 04:39 AM |
#23 |
  -
To your posts? Why yes, indeed! nt |
Flying Dream Blues |
Apr-28-10 10:57 AM |
#36 |
 -
... |
Qutzupalotl |
Apr-29-10 08:40 PM |
#99 |
 -
The PO was NEVER part of his campaign |
LSK |
Apr-28-10 08:30 PM |
#77 |
-
Rec'd! |
Number23 |
Apr-28-10 12:49 AM |
#4 |
-
put an end to people looking where the president gets his money? |
Enrique |
Apr-28-10 01:09 AM |
#6 |
 -
In what world does what I wrote come close to suggesting that? |
phleshdef |
Apr-28-10 01:15 AM |
#7 |
  -
what did Moore say? |
Enrique |
Apr-28-10 01:28 AM |
#11 |
 -
According to whats been posted, he said there should be criminal investigations. |
phleshdef |
Apr-28-10 01:41 AM |
#14 |
 -
I agree with him |
Enrique |
Apr-28-10 01:59 AM |
#18 |
 -
No, the problem is looking for conspiracies when simple research proves otherwise. |
Starbucks Anarchist |
Apr-28-10 01:22 AM |
#8 |
-
what conspiracies? |
Enrique |
Apr-28-10 01:29 AM |
#12 |
-
Moore said GS was Obama's #1 private contributor, which is highly misleading. |
Starbucks Anarchist |
Apr-28-10 01:35 AM |
#13 |
-
62 members of Congress call for criminal investigation of Goldman |
Enrique |
Apr-28-10 01:58 AM |
#17 |
 -
But Moore mentioned the investigation after the misleading stat of campaign contrbutions to Obama. |
Starbucks Anarchist |
Apr-28-10 09:11 AM |
#27 |
-
Thank you for patiently explaining that... |
Cha |
Apr-28-10 11:44 AM |
#42 |
-
It's a full-time job sometimes. |
Starbucks Anarchist |
Apr-28-10 11:59 AM |
#44 |
-
? Moore said there should a criminal investigation into what, exactly? |
chill_wind |
Apr-28-10 02:42 AM |
#19 |
-
I didn't see it either, but posters are conflating the two, apparently. |
Starbucks Anarchist |
Apr-28-10 09:14 AM |
#28 |
-
I was a college freshman then and I donated what i could |
Carnage251 |
Apr-28-10 01:24 AM |
#9 |
-
There are people desperate to project their narrative at every turn. Progressives against Obama are |
stevenleser |
Apr-28-10 01:51 AM |
#15 |
 -
Nah. More like.. |
girl gone mad |
Apr-28-10 04:18 AM |
#22 |
 -
Can you honestly believe that? It was liberals such as myself who helped get him elected. |
ShortnFiery |
Apr-28-10 04:43 AM |
#24 |
 -
you forgot to quote the word: "Progressives" |
mkultra |
Apr-28-10 10:06 AM |
#30 |
-
There are plenty of other spheres of influence |
chill_wind |
Apr-28-10 01:52 AM |
#16 |
-
Okay then, let's just ignore the donations from Goldman, as you wish. |
girl gone mad |
Apr-28-10 04:11 AM |
#21 |
 -
There were no donations from Goldman as some are trying to insinuate. |
phleshdef |
Apr-28-10 10:12 AM |
#31 |
  -
You didn't address my points at all. |
girl gone mad |
Apr-28-10 09:14 PM |
#78 |
 -
SEIU's Andy Stern visited the WH 22 times. |
Starbucks Anarchist |
Apr-28-10 01:58 PM |
#50 |
-
Quick question.. |
girl gone mad |
Apr-28-10 09:29 PM |
#81 |
-
Obviously. |
Starbucks Anarchist |
Apr-28-10 10:20 PM |
#90 |
-
Why don't you try offering the full facts? |
MadHound |
Apr-28-10 08:24 AM |
#25 |
 -
The facts are that individual SMALL donations made up the vast majority of Obama 08 contributions. |
phleshdef |
Apr-28-10 10:04 AM |
#29 |
-
You're sticking words in my mouth, the fact is I didn't say anything about majority, etc. |
MadHound |
Apr-28-10 10:23 AM |
#32 |
-
NOTHING was disingenious. Those facts aren't inconvenient to my point at all. |
phleshdef |
Apr-28-10 10:45 AM |
#34 |
-
What I'm simply pointing out is the rest of the story, |
MadHound |
Apr-28-10 12:07 PM |
#45 |
-
No you are inventing a "Story" where there is none to be found. |
phleshdef |
Apr-28-10 02:05 PM |
#52 |
 -
No, I'm simply pointing out that Obama's campaign wasn't as clean as you and others |
MadHound |
Apr-28-10 03:47 PM |
#59 |
-
You attempted to point out something that wasn't there, as has been shown. |
phleshdef |
Apr-28-10 03:57 PM |
#61 |
-
Oh geez, do I have to go over all of this with you again? |
MadHound |
Apr-28-10 04:18 PM |
#65 |
-
A complete lie in your very first sentence. |
phleshdef |
Apr-28-10 04:27 PM |
#66 |
-
You are naive |
MadHound |
Apr-28-10 04:43 PM |
#67 |
-
You rely on unprovable, conspiratorial assumptions and accuse me of naivete? |
phleshdef |
Apr-28-10 05:03 PM |
#68 |
 -
You're naive. |
girl gone mad |
Apr-28-10 09:26 PM |
#80 |
-
Point out one single fact I presented that is wrong. |
phleshdef |
Apr-28-10 09:32 PM |
#83 |
-
I don't have time for those games. |
girl gone mad |
Apr-28-10 09:52 PM |
#86 |
-
NAME JUST ONE. |
phleshdef |
Apr-28-10 09:58 PM |
#87 |
-
LOL, and while I'm still laughing at your nonsense... please tell me.. |
phleshdef |
Apr-28-10 05:19 PM |
#70 |
-
Also, you should try reading your own link. |
phleshdef |
Apr-28-10 02:09 PM |
#54 |
-
AND finally... shooting down this bundling nonsense once and for all... 11% came from "bundling" |
phleshdef |
Apr-28-10 02:13 PM |
#55 |
-
Obama's in the pocket of Big Hollywood!!!1!! |
Starbucks Anarchist |
Apr-28-10 03:55 PM |
#60 |
-
We always knew he was a celebrity! |
phleshdef |
Apr-28-10 03:57 PM |
#62 |
-
Amen!! |
uponit7771 |
Apr-28-10 09:06 AM |
#26 |
-
PolitiFact Disagrees... |
otohara |
Apr-28-10 10:42 AM |
#33 |
 -
Actually no Politifact is further supporting my point. |
phleshdef |
Apr-28-10 10:51 AM |
#35 |
  -
I know over the course of two years.. |
Cha |
Apr-28-10 11:47 AM |
#43 |
 -
Ooh! Now I'm a BIG Donor! |
FrenchieCat |
Apr-28-10 01:50 PM |
#49 |
-
Exactly. Plenty of regular middle class people were "large donors". |
phleshdef |
Apr-28-10 02:40 PM |
#58 |
-
VERY enlightening site... nt |
greencharlie |
Apr-28-10 11:28 AM |
#37 |
-
Clearly this just means Obama is in the pocket of Big People. |
Arkana |
Apr-28-10 11:32 AM |
#39 |
-
Huge rec for posting the FACTS. Thank you. |
DevonRex |
Apr-28-10 11:35 AM |
#40 |
-
Thanks for your OP, phlesh.. |
Cha |
Apr-28-10 11:42 AM |
#41 |
-
K&R |
Mr. Sparkle |
Apr-28-10 01:06 PM |
#46 |
-
Wow, you do not even quote Moore. Why? |
Bluenorthwest |
Apr-28-10 01:36 PM |
#47 |
 -
My what a cute little tantrum you are having. |
phleshdef |
Apr-28-10 01:44 PM |
#48 |
-
Tantrum? |
Bluenorthwest |
Apr-28-10 02:04 PM |
#51 |
-
What part of "if I was wrong about what Moore meant", then "I apologize" do you not get? |
phleshdef |
Apr-28-10 02:05 PM |
#53 |
-
Wow. I read that part. |
Bluenorthwest |
Apr-28-10 02:18 PM |
#56 |
-
"Fair enough"... theres your quote! |
phleshdef |
Apr-28-10 02:21 PM |
#57 |
-
This is OP's thread. If anyone disagrees with it GTFO and make your own op |
mikelgb |
Apr-28-10 03:59 PM |
#63 |
 -
lol. |
tekisui |
Apr-29-10 09:51 AM |
#95 |
 -
You first. (nt) |
Nicholas D Wolfwood |
Apr-29-10 12:24 PM |
#96 |
-
Futhermore, Obama raised $750.00 million!!! Goldman Sacks gave him $1 million! |
Change Happens |
Apr-28-10 04:00 PM |
#64 |
-
K&R |
treestar |
Apr-28-10 05:10 PM |
#69 |
-
I don't think 2008 campaign contributions are the biggest issue |
okie |
Apr-28-10 05:40 PM |
#71 |
 -
Those days are over |
abelenkpe |
Apr-28-10 07:18 PM |
#73 |
  -
I'm not sure about that |
okie |
Apr-28-10 08:01 PM |
#76 |
   -
You are right |
abelenkpe |
Apr-29-10 07:23 PM |
#98 |
  -
Public opinion shifted long ago. |
girl gone mad |
Apr-28-10 09:35 PM |
#84 |
 -
Great points. Lloyd Blankfein gave $28,000 for example to the DSCC |
chill_wind |
Apr-28-10 09:32 PM |
#82 |
-
Thank you. nt. |
abelenkpe |
Apr-28-10 06:49 PM |
#72 |
-
Now if I could only get him to *stop* asking for money... (n/t) |
whatchamacallit |
Apr-28-10 07:57 PM |
#75 |
-
kick. |
ingac70 |
Apr-28-10 09:25 PM |
#79 |
-
Federal Campaign Contributions- another interesting link |
chill_wind |
Apr-28-10 09:46 PM |
#85 |
-
It makes it even more disgusting |
ibegurpard |
Apr-28-10 10:10 PM |
#88 |
-
But Summers and Rahm made many millions on Wall Street |
MannyGoldstein |
Apr-28-10 10:12 PM |
#89 |
-
have only been paying 1/2 attention DU |
rufus dog |
Apr-28-10 11:11 PM |
#91 |
 -
Oh is that what this is about.I didn't keep track of my donations,but wrote frequent small checks |
Hekate |
Apr-29-10 12:54 AM |
#94 |
-
Thumbs up |
Hekate |
Apr-29-10 12:29 AM |
#93 |
-
Exactly! nt |
MzShellG |
Apr-29-10 05:58 PM |
#97 |
-
+1 |
DCBob |
Apr-29-10 08:54 PM |
#100 |