You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #20: To develop ALL areas for drilling including the tar sands, oil from coal, more nuclear, more coal. [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread		 This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU
kristopher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-31-10 12:37 PM
Response to Reply #18
20. To develop ALL areas for drilling including the tar sands, oil from coal, more nuclear, more coal.
Edited on Wed Mar-31-10 12:37 PM by kristopher
How is that for a start?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
  -I have failed to appreciate Obama's brilliance. kristopher  Mar-31-10 11:31 AM   #0 
  - You miss a lot of deeper points.  tabatha   Mar-31-10 11:33 AM   #1 
  - Evidently...  tyne   Mar-31-10 11:34 AM   #3 
  - No, I didn't miss the CLAIMS of "deeper points"  kristopher   Mar-31-10 12:00 PM   #12 
     - Obama capitulated on the stimulus bill, too; he gave in to rethug demands for useless tax cuts  amborin   Mar-31-10 12:10 PM   #15 
     - When I found out he used the excuse of Republican opposition to make a deal on single payer  kristopher   Mar-31-10 12:12 PM   #16 
     - I like my $800 tax cut  sandnsea   Mar-31-10 12:30 PM   #19 
     - that's short-term payoff; we're talking of massive environmental destruction & corporate takeover  amborin   Mar-31-10 08:16 PM   #37 
     - Yea, this 'capitulation' sure does suck...  babylonsister   Mar-31-10 01:35 PM   #29 
     - Single Payer was NEVER what Obama promised.  tabatha   Mar-31-10 01:34 PM   #28 
        - Didn't you read the 2008 Democratic Party platform? I sure did.  Ignis   Mar-31-10 02:02 PM   #33 
        - Obama campaigned on the PO and the votes WERE there, and majority  amborin   Mar-31-10 08:17 PM   #38 
           - The votes were not there. If they had tried to pass the PO in the  ncteechur   Mar-31-10 08:41 PM   #39 
              - nonsense; the public was and is in favor of the PO and O had the opportunity to implement it; but  amborin   Mar-31-10 10:00 PM   #41 
  - How much oil will this drilling produce?  sandnsea   Mar-31-10 11:34 AM   #2 
  - Probably very little  sharp_stick   Mar-31-10 11:37 AM   #6 
  - Still, how much? .25% of our usage?  sandnsea   Mar-31-10 11:43 AM   #9 
     - It doesn't matter. It will be sold on the open market to the highest bidder. n/t  dgibby   Mar-31-10 12:20 PM   #17 
        - It won't meet our energy needs.  sandnsea   Mar-31-10 12:28 PM   #18 
           - To develop ALL areas for drilling including the tar sands, oil from coal, more nuclear, more coal.  kristopher   Mar-31-10 12:37 PM   #20 
              - It STILL won't be enough  sandnsea   Mar-31-10 12:39 PM   #21 
                 - Who said anything about having enough oil?  kristopher   Mar-31-10 12:51 PM   #23 
                    - That's the entire point. Drilling won't work  sandnsea   Mar-31-10 01:09 PM   #24 
                       - When do you expect that to happen? 2035? 2050? 500ppm CO2?  kristopher   Mar-31-10 01:38 PM   #30 
                          - The discussion is happening NOW  sandnsea   Mar-31-10 02:01 PM   #32 
                          - You are in a futile conversation.  Jakes Progress   Mar-31-10 02:14 PM   #35 
  - I think the real question is how much drilling is actually going to happen.  phleshdef   Mar-31-10 11:37 AM   #7 
  - Triangulation  zipplewrath   Mar-31-10 11:35 AM   #4 
  - Simplistic thinking  tridim   Mar-31-10 11:36 AM   #5 
  - Tackling global warming is a Republican agenda?  NJmaverick   Mar-31-10 11:38 AM   #8 
  - K&R we're already expanding US military bases in Colombia:  amborin   Mar-31-10 11:51 AM   #10 
  - I wonder if the enrollment for what was known as "School of the Americas" is up lately?  ShortnFiery   Mar-31-10 12:00 PM   #11 
  - You the "Demagogy of the day" award  impik   Mar-31-10 12:01 PM   #13 
  - weird, I recc'd this thread but its still zero  Lerkfish   Mar-31-10 12:05 PM   #14 
  - Oh, but this is the _New_ Triangulation!  Ignis   Mar-31-10 12:46 PM   #22 
  - Most dems are accustomed to their presidents speaking to them..  mkultra   Mar-31-10 01:13 PM   #25 
  - Except he's not.  TheKentuckian   Mar-31-10 02:13 PM   #34 
     - uh, ok  mkultra   Apr-01-10 10:24 PM   #44 
  - delete  dave29   Mar-31-10 01:31 PM   #26 
  - do you think anyone cares what you've failed to do?  Teaser   Mar-31-10 01:32 PM   #27 
  - Deleted message  Name removed   Mar-31-10 01:38 PM   #31 
  - If you can't tell the difference between Obama's agenda and a Republican agenda  RFKHumphreyObama   Mar-31-10 03:15 PM   #36 
  - Great post.  hulka38   Mar-31-10 09:05 PM   #40 
  - You indeed have failed...  zulchzulu   Mar-31-10 10:04 PM   #42 
  - The Rethugs of today want nothing to do with many of Obama's proposoals.  Jennicut   Mar-31-10 10:09 PM   #43 
  - Clinton figured this out in the 1990's  depakid   Apr-01-10 10:31 PM   #45 
 

Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators

Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC