You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #25: You implied it in your earlier posts and didn't deny it until now, after I showed proof there wasn't [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU
ClarkUSA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-30-10 12:07 PM
Response to Reply #24
25. You implied it in your earlier posts and didn't deny it until now, after I showed proof there wasn't
Edited on Tue Mar-30-10 01:06 PM by ClarkUSA
There are no "indefinite detentions" either, because the Obama Administration changed BushCo policy in August 2009, as I have proven in my previous reply.

One mo' time:

The Obama administration has limited detention to 2 weeks, breaking with BushCo Pentagon policy:

In August, the administration restricted the time that detainees could be held at the military jails to two weeks, changing previous Pentagon policy. In the past, the military could obtain extensions.


Your claims seem to be specious.

Furthermore:

While two of the detainees were captured before the Obama administration took office, one was captured in June of this year... All three detainees were later released without charges. None said they had been tortured...In August, the military said that it had begun to give the Red Cross the names of everyone detained, including those held in the Special Operations camps, within two weeks of capture... All three detainees said the hardest part of their detention was that their families did not know whether they were alive.


Source: http://www.nytimes.com/2009/11/29/world/asia/29bagram.h...





Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
  -Obama's Bagram Fly-in: What He Didn't Visit tekisui  Mar-29-10 09:56 AM   #0 
  - Deleted sub-thread  Name removed   Mar-29-10 10:00 AM   #1 
  - Apparently  MadBadger   Mar-29-10 10:03 AM   #2 
  - Yeah, bummer he didn't visit the terrorist prisoners.  Phx_Dem   Mar-29-10 07:31 PM   #3 
  - Um, if it's really a "secret prison" then how does Harry Shearer know about it?  ClarkUSA   Mar-29-10 08:36 PM   #4 
  - Bagram is the new gitmo.  tekisui   Mar-29-10 08:39 PM   #5 
     - You didn't answer my question. Is it a "secret prison" or not?  ClarkUSA   Mar-29-10 08:50 PM   #6 
        - How would I know if there is a secret prison within  tekisui   Mar-29-10 08:54 PM   #7 
        - How does Shearer know, then? So far, there is no credible answer to my simple question.  ClarkUSA   Mar-29-10 08:57 PM   #8 
           - The prison has expanded and people are held there  tekisui   Mar-29-10 09:12 PM   #9 
              - Repeating the same unproven statements over and over again do not make them true.  ClarkUSA   Mar-29-10 09:21 PM   #11 
                 - Deleted message  Name removed   Mar-29-10 09:38 PM   #12 
                 - Sorry you are incapable of paying attention or conducting easy research.  tekisui   Mar-30-10 08:16 AM   #14 
                    - lol! Sorry you are ignoring my previous reply where I said I found nothing that proves your claims.  ClarkUSA   Mar-30-10 09:24 AM   #16 
                       - Here you go. I didn't want to waste my time doing your work.  tekisui   Mar-30-10 11:00 AM   #21 
                          - Everything you've offered dates back to things that allegedly occurred under BushCo.  ClarkUSA   Mar-30-10 11:53 AM   #23 
                             - There is no proof of abuse under Obama, I didn't claim  tekisui   Mar-30-10 11:59 AM   #24 
                                - You implied it in your earlier posts and didn't deny it until now, after I showed proof there wasn't  ClarkUSA   Mar-30-10 12:07 PM   #25 
                                   - Deleted message  Name removed   Mar-30-10 12:21 PM   #27 
        - No, it's not a secret.  Forkboy   Mar-29-10 09:17 PM   #10 
  - Yes he should have gone there  jeanpalmer   Mar-30-10 02:24 AM   #13 
  - How does Harry know he didnt?  MadBadger   Mar-30-10 09:41 AM   #19 
  - Deleted message  Name removed   Mar-30-10 12:14 PM   #26 
  - It's an open secret that the rest of the world is back to being *scared shitless* of ...  ShortnFiery   Mar-30-10 08:25 AM   #15 
  - I'm not aware of any polling that states what you claim. Quite the opposite.  ClarkUSA   Mar-30-10 09:34 AM   #17 
  - Now that's a snarky stretch...  jefferson_dem   Mar-30-10 09:36 AM   #18 
  - Thank you for these threads --  Hell Hath No Fury   Mar-30-10 10:57 AM   #20 
  - You're welcome.  tekisui   Mar-30-10 11:02 AM   #22 
  - Why would he?  BklnDem75   Mar-30-10 12:36 PM   #28 
 

Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC