damonm
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Mar-15-10 05:21 PM
Response to Reply #5 |
| 6. Section and page, please. |
|
If you've read the bill, this should be no problem.
|
| -What Failure Would Cost the Democrats |
babylonsister |
Mar-15-10 03:29 PM |
#0 |
 -
This article gets it right. Absolutely right. |
CaliforniaPeggy |
Mar-15-10 03:35 PM |
#1 |
| -
Yes, failure would cost the Dems; but ... |
damntexdem |
Mar-15-10 03:39 PM |
#2 |
  -
Either way is the same outcome |
zipplewrath |
Mar-15-10 03:52 PM |
#3 |
| -
Absolutely right. |
backscatter712 |
Mar-15-10 04:20 PM |
#4 |
| -
There are loopholes on recision, yearly caps, and Medicare cuts. |
Nikki Stone1 |
Mar-15-10 04:58 PM |
#5 |
| -
Section and page, please. |
damonm |
Mar-15-10 05:21 PM |
#6 |
| -
Which bill? It has been changing continuously since December. |
Nikki Stone1 |
Mar-15-10 06:05 PM |
#7 |
| -
The MSM?!? *snort* |
damonm |
Mar-15-10 06:11 PM |
#8 |
| -
I have the bill itself in front of me. Let's start with annual caps |
Nikki Stone1 |
Mar-15-10 06:21 PM |
#9 |
| -
What I'm missing here... |
damonm |
Mar-15-10 09:11 PM |
#15 |
| -
This is where you have to understand how goverment works and what is practical |
Nikki Stone1 |
Mar-15-10 11:49 PM |
#19 |
| -
Some misconceptions in this. |
damonm |
Mar-16-10 12:04 AM |
#24 |
| -
HHS is only as powerful as its backing: that's the White House |
Nikki Stone1 |
Mar-16-10 01:29 AM |
#33 |
| -
This was a loophole which mysteriously appeared in the bill and which the President |
laughingliberal |
Mar-16-10 01:14 AM |
#32 |
| -
House Tri-Committee Report on Medicaid cuts with Senate bill |
Nikki Stone1 |
Mar-15-10 06:29 PM |
#10 |
| -
Hm. Need to look into this further, |
damonm |
Mar-15-10 09:27 PM |
#16 |
| -
That would explain Medicaid but not Medicare, and the claim I made was about Medicare |
Nikki Stone1 |
Mar-15-10 11:54 PM |
#20 |
| -
OK, I think I see where you're going. |
damonm |
Mar-16-10 12:15 AM |
#27 |
| -
No, not guesses. Actual figures in the bill, which I gave you. |
Nikki Stone1 |
Mar-16-10 01:31 AM |
#34 |
| -
Actual figures as to dollar amounts, yes. |
damonm |
Mar-16-10 10:17 AM |
#35 |
| -
Oh, crickets now, that I actually have the bill in front of me. |
Nikki Stone1 |
Mar-15-10 06:29 PM |
#11 |
| -
It's more properly known as... |
damonm |
Mar-15-10 08:53 PM |
#14 |
| -
Be careful when you snark at people. |
Nikki Stone1 |
Mar-15-10 11:55 PM |
#21 |
| -
Note the smilie. |
damonm |
Mar-16-10 12:05 AM |
#25 |
| -
Why don't you provide links and passages |
waiting for hope |
Mar-15-10 07:31 PM |
#13 |
| -
Because the poster I responded to is making claims, and thus |
damonm |
Mar-15-10 09:29 PM |
#17 |
| -
It's not a secret that the loophole for rescissions and annual caps somehow slipped back into the |
laughingliberal |
Mar-16-10 01:04 AM |
#29 |
| -
Here's what it's costing the rest of us: |
Nikki Stone1 |
Mar-15-10 06:44 PM |
#12 |
| -
Actually, the state initiatives allowed by |
damonm |
Mar-15-10 09:49 PM |
#18 |
| -
Not really. |
Nikki Stone1 |
Mar-15-10 11:56 PM |
#22 |
| -
I see no restrictions on states in the bill... |
damonm |
Mar-16-10 12:18 AM |
#28 |
| -
I'm a little more concerned about what 'success' will cost the American People. |
last1standing |
Mar-16-10 12:01 AM |
#23 |
| -
exactly |
ibegurpard |
Mar-16-10 12:07 AM |
#26 |
| -
Failure costs 45,000 lives every year... |
Ozymanithrax |
Mar-16-10 01:08 AM |
#30 |
| -
Thoughtful and incisive. We can own this debate for the fall and forever |
saltpoint |
Mar-16-10 01:12 AM |
#31 |
Printer-friendly format
Email this thread to a friend
Bookmark this thread