You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #13: Name-calling is against the rules: You've done that twice now. [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU
ShortnFiery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-09-10 08:30 AM
Response to Reply #11
13. Name-calling is against the rules: You've done that twice now.
Very un-cool.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
  -Unlikely voters so disappointed in Obama, they overwhelmingly approve of his job performance babylonsister  Mar-09-10 07:07 AM   #0 
  - Unrec for the whiny title. n/t  donco6   Mar-09-10 07:12 AM   #1 
  - Midterm elections always have higher turnouts from older voters.  Jennicut   Mar-09-10 07:15 AM   #2 
  - You're already getting the EXCUSES lined up?  ShortnFiery   Mar-09-10 07:36 AM   #5 
  - Bush vetoed the SCHIP expansion, that Obama signed  karynnj   Mar-09-10 07:58 AM   #9 
  - Deleted message  Name removed   Mar-09-10 08:01 AM   #11 
     - Name-calling is against the rules: You've done that twice now.  ShortnFiery   Mar-09-10 08:30 AM   #13 
  - Deleted sub-thread  Name removed   Mar-09-10 08:00 AM   #10 
  - Huh? Just stating a well know fact.  Jennicut   Mar-09-10 08:16 AM   #12 
     - No, you were making excuses. You could have owned up to the obvious THEN shot back with your  ShortnFiery   Mar-09-10 08:51 AM   #15 
  - In addition, the "likely voters" models usually take that into consideration  karynnj   Mar-09-10 09:14 AM   #16 
  - K&R for reality. n/t  JTFrog   Mar-09-10 07:24 AM   #3 
  - Horrible analysis. The BASE is people who VOTE  Kurt_and_Hunter   Mar-09-10 07:26 AM   #4 
  - Ha! Funny.  Clio the Leo   Mar-09-10 07:43 AM   #6 
  - Wait... what?  Jester Messiah   Mar-09-10 07:47 AM   #7 
  - They're registered but considered unlikely; maybe their  babylonsister   Mar-09-10 07:54 AM   #8 
  - Hope changed.  Bluenorthwest   Mar-09-10 08:41 AM   #14 
  - Unlikely to vote in 2010.  namahage   Mar-09-10 02:58 PM   #18 
  - The simplest answer to your BOLD question is:  GeorgeGist   Mar-09-10 02:22 PM   #17 
 

Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC