niyad
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Jan-24-10 09:27 PM
Response to Reply #3 |
| 18. you mean states like south dakota, missouri and ohio, which have all tried to outlaw abortions? |
|
a congress that includes stupak, pitts, and the other woman-hating, misogynistic anti-choicers?
what in heaven's name ARE you smoking?
|
| -Roberts clear shot at Roe uttered in the Citizen's United decision:: |
cali |
Jan-24-10 06:35 AM |
#0 |
-
Ding, ding, ding! |
Turbineguy |
Jan-24-10 06:37 AM |
#1 |
 -
sadly, I think you are correct. |
niyad |
Jan-24-10 09:28 PM |
#19 |
-
So much for his stupid "umpire" analogy. |
jefferson_dem |
Jan-24-10 06:54 AM |
#2 |
-
What about Dred Scott? |
Yurovsky |
Jan-24-10 06:57 AM |
#3 |
 -
You don't understand the culture war |
Gman |
Jan-24-10 07:28 AM |
#6 |
 -
Dred Scott was never overturned by the Court. |
Pab Sungenis |
Jan-24-10 07:56 AM |
#7 |
  -
Brown v. Board of Education overturned Plessy v. Ferguson. |
backscatter712 |
Jan-24-10 09:55 AM |
#13 |
 -
I would like to see Kelo overturned. nt |
Phoebe Loosinhouse |
Jan-25-10 06:39 AM |
#33 |
 -
you mean states like south dakota, missouri and ohio, which have all tried to outlaw abortions? |
niyad |
Jan-24-10 09:27 PM |
#18 |
 -
Which Supreme Court Decision overturned Dred Scott? |
Thothmes |
Jan-26-10 05:34 AM |
#38 |
-
It also proves Corp Personhood can be overturned |
FreakinDJ |
Jan-24-10 07:21 AM |
#4 |
 -
But unlikely unless we finally amend the Constitution. |
Pab Sungenis |
Jan-24-10 07:57 AM |
#8 |
-
We should petition for both |
FreakinDJ |
Jan-24-10 08:34 AM |
#10 |
-
Ahem. Not Roe (which isn't good law anymore) but the basic premise(s) found in Griswold |
depakid |
Jan-24-10 07:24 AM |
#5 |
 -
... and Griswold was also the foundation of: |
boppers |
Jan-24-10 10:07 PM |
#22 |
  -
Actually, Lawrence takes a completely different tack |
depakid |
Jan-25-10 12:00 AM |
#29 |
 -
URL plz? eom |
boppers |
Jan-25-10 06:26 AM |
#32 |
 -
Right to privacy. |
Manifestor_of_Light |
Jan-24-10 11:38 PM |
#28 |
-
codswallop. |
bahrbearian |
Jan-24-10 08:24 AM |
#9 |
-
The SC wont touch Roe for the same reason bush* didnt ever catch bin Ladin. |
rhett o rick |
Jan-24-10 09:33 AM |
#11 |
 -
You underestimate the nature of fundamentalists |
depakid |
Jan-25-10 01:08 AM |
#30 |
-
Yes, but the fundamentalists arent in charge. They are tools of those in charge. Those in charge |
rhett o rick |
Jan-25-10 06:22 PM |
#36 |
-
We face some scary years ahead until these RW justices |
azmouse |
Jan-24-10 09:50 AM |
#12 |
-
So much for Robert's claim |
Mz Pip |
Jan-24-10 10:38 AM |
#14 |
 -
Thank you, Mz Pip. I was just remembering how the Democratic Senators were all gushing |
bertman |
Jan-24-10 12:41 PM |
#15 |
-
Every justice agrees with that statement. It's nothing special. n/t |
Unvanguard |
Jan-24-10 12:42 PM |
#16 |
-
What is inexorable is the is the utter contempt the heinously felonious five have for our |
indepat |
Jan-24-10 03:59 PM |
#17 |
-
Roberts uttered many clear shots at Roe before he became Chief Justice. n/t |
ProSense |
Jan-24-10 09:32 PM |
#20 |
-
So much for "stare decisis" |
Canuckistanian |
Jan-24-10 10:00 PM |
#21 |
 -
"Stare Decisis" is now "Selective Decisis" |
cascadiance |
Jan-24-10 10:13 PM |
#23 |
-
I read an article a few years back |
Canuckistanian |
Jan-24-10 10:53 PM |
#26 |
-
We know it was five judges that betrayed the Constitution and America... |
winyanstaz |
Jan-24-10 10:29 PM |
#24 |
-
I wouldn't waste much time speculating how he would vote on Roe v. Wade. |
Bleacher Creature |
Jan-24-10 10:44 PM |
#25 |
-
"Conservatives Without Conscience"... after reading that... |
krispos42 |
Jan-24-10 11:12 PM |
#27 |
-
If Roberts wasn't on the Supreme Court, I bet he'd be living on C-Street - ya think? |
tomm2thumbs |
Jan-25-10 01:58 AM |
#31 |
-
Justice Kennedy made a similar comment in the Heller case |
Shrek |
Jan-25-10 06:44 AM |
#34 |
-
As far as that goes, he's right. |
Orsino |
Jan-25-10 08:19 AM |
#35 |
-
Yet I can't help remembering... |
ljm2002 |
Jan-25-10 06:44 PM |
#37 |