ProSense
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Jan-16-10 03:42 PM
Response to Reply #25 |
| -Krugman: More on Jon Gruber |
ProSense |
Jan-15-10 04:35 PM |
#0 |
 -
The entire Greenwald piece should be read ... |
slipslidingaway |
Jan-15-10 05:29 PM |
#1 |
 -
Large UNDISCLOSED payments? |
Jeff In Milwaukee |
Jan-15-10 07:06 PM |
#2 |
| -
From Greenwald's trainwreck post |
ProSense |
Jan-15-10 07:28 PM |
#4 |
| -
Yeah, but Sunstein is still an idiot. I don't know about you, but I can |
beachmom |
Jan-15-10 08:03 PM |
#6 |
 -
Regardless, that has nothing to do with Greenwald's distortion. n/t |
ProSense |
Jan-15-10 08:07 PM |
#7 |
| -
It's your distortion. You should have read it before posting about it. |
Capers |
Jan-16-10 02:32 PM |
#25 |
| -
It's garbage. n/t |
ProSense |
Jan-16-10 03:42 PM |
#43 |
| -
Sunstein's piece is about "combatting extremism" in the form of conspiracy theorists. And...? |
Leopolds Ghost |
Jan-16-10 12:43 PM |
#13 |
| -
Your entire post is a misrepresentation of facts. |
Capers |
Jan-16-10 02:14 PM |
#20 |
| -
Please post where it was disclosed on the WH site that there was ... |
slipslidingaway |
Jan-15-10 08:12 PM |
#8 |
| -
As Greenwald is a flaming fucktard.... |
Jeff In Milwaukee |
Jan-15-10 11:44 PM |
#10 |
| -
Gruber signed a contract saying he was not being paid by the government. |
Capers |
Jan-16-10 02:16 PM |
#21 |
| -
Prove it... |
Jeff In Milwaukee |
Jan-16-10 03:51 PM |
#47 |
| -
He's admitted to it. The Times has covered it. It's not a secret. |
Capers |
Jan-17-10 02:15 PM |
#57 |
| -
And DeParle is a flaming fucking liar |
Hello_Kitty |
Jan-16-10 02:52 PM |
#35 |
| -
Undisclosed to the point of fraud. |
Capers |
Jan-16-10 02:09 PM |
#18 |
| -
BS. n/t |
ProSense |
Jan-16-10 02:50 PM |
#34 |
| -
He did nothing of the sort.... |
Jeff In Milwaukee |
Jan-16-10 03:53 PM |
#48 |
| -
What I'm saying is that he lied when he signed his disclosure contract |
Capers |
Jan-17-10 02:12 PM |
#56 |
| -
I read the entire piece (I often read Glenn) and here is the deal: |
beachmom |
Jan-15-10 07:59 PM |
#5 |
| -
False thesis. Sustein did not write about Muslim extremism and 9/11. |
Capers |
Jan-16-10 02:18 PM |
#22 |
| -
Fuck that whiny glen greenwald and Liar dog lake. |
Cha |
Jan-15-10 07:07 PM |
#3 |
| -
Yes.... |
Jeff In Milwaukee |
Jan-15-10 11:47 PM |
#11 |
| -
I really admire Greenwald |
tishaLA |
Jan-15-10 08:26 PM |
#9 |
| -
KnR for Krugman, whom I trust. nt |
Hekate |
Jan-16-10 03:25 AM |
#12 |
| -
You shouldn't trust a guy who likens politics to epidemiology. |
Capers |
Jan-16-10 02:29 PM |
#24 |
| -
LOL. Krugman's a twitchy guy, but very, very bright. |
Hekate |
Jan-16-10 10:23 PM |
#53 |
| -
Greenwald responds to Krugman's response |
Irish_shark |
Jan-16-10 01:00 PM |
#14 |
| -
That's Greenwald's defense for his trainwreck post? |
ProSense |
Jan-16-10 01:04 PM |
#15 |
| -
Not just that. Greenwald notes that Armstrong contract didn't specifically ask for a partiular view |
Irish_shark |
Jan-16-10 01:10 PM |
#16 |
| -
Greenwald is suddenly an apologist for Armstrong Williams, payola and propaganda. |
ProSense |
Jan-16-10 02:32 PM |
#26 |
| -
No, you are. |
Capers |
Jan-16-10 02:33 PM |
#27 |
| -
Wrong. Greenwald criticized Armstrong |
Irish_shark |
Jan-16-10 02:43 PM |
#30 |
| -
BS. Greenwald originally tried to frame Gruber and Armstrong as being the same and |
ProSense |
Jan-16-10 02:48 PM |
#33 |
| -
Can you point to the part where he allegedly backtracked? |
Irish_shark |
Jan-16-10 02:53 PM |
#36 |
| -
Train |
ProSense |
Jan-16-10 03:06 PM |
#38 |
| -
Huh? Where's the backtracking? |
Irish_shark |
Jan-16-10 03:13 PM |
#39 |
| -
Are you kidding? |
ProSense |
Jan-16-10 03:21 PM |
#40 |
| -
Greenwald criticizes a common problem in both cases |
Irish_shark |
Jan-16-10 03:26 PM |
#41 |
| -
Do you even understand what your're reading or are you pretending to be confused |
ProSense |
Jan-16-10 03:33 PM |
#42 |
| -
But he explains that Armstrong held those views before they hired him |
Irish_shark |
Jan-16-10 03:42 PM |
#44 |
| -
That makes no sense. n/t |
ProSense |
Jan-16-10 03:43 PM |
#45 |
| -
You pretend it makes no sense nt |
Irish_shark |
Jan-16-10 03:44 PM |
#46 |
| -
Didn't Krugman himself acknowledge that Gruber should have disclosed it? |
Hello_Kitty |
Jan-16-10 02:40 PM |
#29 |
| -
Gruber should have disclosed. End of story. |
freddie mertz |
Jan-16-10 03:04 PM |
#37 |
| -
Greenwald is a good progressive, but he stepped in it this time. |
izzybeans |
Jan-16-10 02:05 PM |
#17 |
| -
Krugman has made it into the Big Club - where intellect can mask greed and arrogance. |
ShortnFiery |
Jan-16-10 02:11 PM |
#19 |
| -
Krugman has always been willing to sell whatever the people he's working for want him to. |
Hello_Kitty |
Jan-16-10 02:47 PM |
#32 |
| -
Like Krugman, you seem to be likening science to politics. |
Capers |
Jan-16-10 02:21 PM |
#23 |
| -
So there's no problem with Gruber's contract being disclosed from now on, is there? |
Hello_Kitty |
Jan-16-10 02:44 PM |
#31 |
| -
So there's no problem with disclosing Gruber's contract from now on, is there Dr. Krugman? |
Hello_Kitty |
Jan-16-10 02:38 PM |
#28 |
| -
You're getting warm.... |
Jeff In Milwaukee |
Jan-16-10 04:03 PM |
#49 |
| -
The Armstrong Williams comparison was about lack of disclosure, not the nature of the contracts |
Hello_Kitty |
Jan-16-10 04:19 PM |
#50 |
| -
You're getting colder... |
Jeff In Milwaukee |
Jan-16-10 04:32 PM |
#51 |
| -
And you're getting increasingly condescending and patronizing, yet haven't made your case |
Hello_Kitty |
Jan-16-10 08:55 PM |
#52 |
| -
It's because I'm getting increasingly annoyed.... |
Jeff In Milwaukee |
Jan-17-10 09:51 AM |
#54 |
| -
Damn, dude, try some yoga breathing. |
Hello_Kitty |
Jan-17-10 11:52 AM |
#55 |
Printer-friendly format
Email this thread to a friend
Bookmark this thread