You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #35: And DeParle is a flaming fucking liar [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU
Hello_Kitty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-16-10 02:52 PM
Response to Reply #10
35. And DeParle is a flaming fucking liar
A hearty "fuck you" goes out to anyone who wants to excuse lying to the public because the liar has a D by her name.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
  -Krugman: More on Jon Gruber ProSense  Jan-15-10 04:35 PM   #0 
  - The entire Greenwald piece should be read ...  slipslidingaway   Jan-15-10 05:29 PM   #1 
  - Large UNDISCLOSED payments?  Jeff In Milwaukee   Jan-15-10 07:06 PM   #2 
  - From Greenwald's trainwreck post  ProSense   Jan-15-10 07:28 PM   #4 
  - Yeah, but Sunstein is still an idiot. I don't know about you, but I can  beachmom   Jan-15-10 08:03 PM   #6 
  - Regardless, that has nothing to do with Greenwald's distortion. n/t  ProSense   Jan-15-10 08:07 PM   #7 
     - It's your distortion. You should have read it before posting about it.  Capers   Jan-16-10 02:32 PM   #25 
        - It's garbage. n/t  ProSense   Jan-16-10 03:42 PM   #43 
  - Sunstein's piece is about "combatting extremism" in the form of conspiracy theorists. And...?  Leopolds Ghost   Jan-16-10 12:43 PM   #13 
  - Your entire post is a misrepresentation of facts.  Capers   Jan-16-10 02:14 PM   #20 
  - Please post where it was disclosed on the WH site that there was ...  slipslidingaway   Jan-15-10 08:12 PM   #8 
  - As Greenwald is a flaming fucktard....  Jeff In Milwaukee   Jan-15-10 11:44 PM   #10 
     - Gruber signed a contract saying he was not being paid by the government.  Capers   Jan-16-10 02:16 PM   #21 
     - Prove it...  Jeff In Milwaukee   Jan-16-10 03:51 PM   #47 
        - He's admitted to it. The Times has covered it. It's not a secret.  Capers   Jan-17-10 02:15 PM   #57 
     - And DeParle is a flaming fucking liar  Hello_Kitty   Jan-16-10 02:52 PM   #35 
  - Undisclosed to the point of fraud.  Capers   Jan-16-10 02:09 PM   #18 
     - BS. n/t  ProSense   Jan-16-10 02:50 PM   #34 
     - He did nothing of the sort....  Jeff In Milwaukee   Jan-16-10 03:53 PM   #48 
        - What I'm saying is that he lied when he signed his disclosure contract  Capers   Jan-17-10 02:12 PM   #56 
  - I read the entire piece (I often read Glenn) and here is the deal:  beachmom   Jan-15-10 07:59 PM   #5 
     - False thesis. Sustein did not write about Muslim extremism and 9/11.  Capers   Jan-16-10 02:18 PM   #22 
  - Fuck that whiny glen greenwald and Liar dog lake.  Cha   Jan-15-10 07:07 PM   #3 
  - Yes....  Jeff In Milwaukee   Jan-15-10 11:47 PM   #11 
  - I really admire Greenwald  tishaLA   Jan-15-10 08:26 PM   #9 
  - KnR for Krugman, whom I trust. nt  Hekate   Jan-16-10 03:25 AM   #12 
  - You shouldn't trust a guy who likens politics to epidemiology.  Capers   Jan-16-10 02:29 PM   #24 
     - LOL. Krugman's a twitchy guy, but very, very bright.  Hekate   Jan-16-10 10:23 PM   #53 
  - Greenwald responds to Krugman's response  Irish_shark   Jan-16-10 01:00 PM   #14 
  - That's Greenwald's defense for his trainwreck post?  ProSense   Jan-16-10 01:04 PM   #15 
  - Not just that. Greenwald notes that Armstrong contract didn't specifically ask for a partiular view  Irish_shark   Jan-16-10 01:10 PM   #16 
     - Greenwald is suddenly an apologist for Armstrong Williams, payola and propaganda.  ProSense   Jan-16-10 02:32 PM   #26 
        - No, you are.  Capers   Jan-16-10 02:33 PM   #27 
        - Wrong. Greenwald criticized Armstrong  Irish_shark   Jan-16-10 02:43 PM   #30 
           - BS. Greenwald originally tried to frame Gruber and Armstrong as being the same and  ProSense   Jan-16-10 02:48 PM   #33 
              - Can you point to the part where he allegedly backtracked?  Irish_shark   Jan-16-10 02:53 PM   #36 
                 - Train  ProSense   Jan-16-10 03:06 PM   #38 
                    - Huh? Where's the backtracking?  Irish_shark   Jan-16-10 03:13 PM   #39 
                       - Are you kidding?  ProSense   Jan-16-10 03:21 PM   #40 
                          - Greenwald criticizes a common problem in both cases  Irish_shark   Jan-16-10 03:26 PM   #41 
                             - Do you even understand what your're reading or are you pretending to be confused  ProSense   Jan-16-10 03:33 PM   #42 
                                - But he explains that Armstrong held those views before they hired him  Irish_shark   Jan-16-10 03:42 PM   #44 
                                   - That makes no sense. n/t  ProSense   Jan-16-10 03:43 PM   #45 
                                      - You pretend it makes no sense nt  Irish_shark   Jan-16-10 03:44 PM   #46 
  - Didn't Krugman himself acknowledge that Gruber should have disclosed it?  Hello_Kitty   Jan-16-10 02:40 PM   #29 
     - Gruber should have disclosed. End of story.  freddie mertz   Jan-16-10 03:04 PM   #37 
  - Greenwald is a good progressive, but he stepped in it this time.  izzybeans   Jan-16-10 02:05 PM   #17 
  - Krugman has made it into the Big Club - where intellect can mask greed and arrogance.  ShortnFiery   Jan-16-10 02:11 PM   #19 
  - Krugman has always been willing to sell whatever the people he's working for want him to.  Hello_Kitty   Jan-16-10 02:47 PM   #32 
  - Like Krugman, you seem to be likening science to politics.  Capers   Jan-16-10 02:21 PM   #23 
  - So there's no problem with Gruber's contract being disclosed from now on, is there?  Hello_Kitty   Jan-16-10 02:44 PM   #31 
  - So there's no problem with disclosing Gruber's contract from now on, is there Dr. Krugman?  Hello_Kitty   Jan-16-10 02:38 PM   #28 
     - You're getting warm....  Jeff In Milwaukee   Jan-16-10 04:03 PM   #49 
        - The Armstrong Williams comparison was about lack of disclosure, not the nature of the contracts  Hello_Kitty   Jan-16-10 04:19 PM   #50 
           - You're getting colder...  Jeff In Milwaukee   Jan-16-10 04:32 PM   #51 
              - And you're getting increasingly condescending and patronizing, yet haven't made your case  Hello_Kitty   Jan-16-10 08:55 PM   #52 
                 - It's because I'm getting increasingly annoyed....  Jeff In Milwaukee   Jan-17-10 09:51 AM   #54 
                    - Damn, dude, try some yoga breathing.  Hello_Kitty   Jan-17-10 11:52 AM   #55 
 

Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC