shopgreen
(190 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jan-13-10 05:03 PM
Response to Original message |
| 160. Obama Demands: The Bill I Sign Must Include Public Option ** |
| -FACTS MATTER: Candidate Obama DID promise a Public Option (O'Donnell). |
freddie mertz |
Jan-10-10 12:10 PM |
#0 |
-
Deleted message |
Name removed |
Jan-10-10 12:11 PM |
#1 |
 -
LOL ... |
ShortnFiery |
Jan-10-10 12:26 PM |
#11 |
-
He supported a public option. That doesn't mean he could force the Senate |
pnwmom |
Jan-10-10 12:13 PM |
#2 |
 -
Fine, Just don't be a flip-flopper! |
bigwillq |
Jan-10-10 12:14 PM |
#3 |
  -
He has never said he doesn't support one. But why should he advertise |
pnwmom |
Jan-10-10 12:27 PM |
#12 |
 -
He denied he ever ran on it. Which was patently untrue. |
freddie mertz |
Jan-10-10 12:34 PM |
#19 |
  -
Candidate Obama dd NOT PROMISE a Public Option |
krawhitham |
Jan-10-10 03:09 PM |
#62 |
 -
He said "I did not CAMPAIGN" on a PO. Not "promise." Though he DID promise later. |
freddie mertz |
Jan-10-10 03:26 PM |
#65 |
 -
He said he never campaigned on it. |
bigwillq |
Jan-10-10 12:37 PM |
#22 |
 -
A Promise is more binding than "campaigning on" the same. One can campaign on meaningless THEMES |
Land Shark |
Jan-10-10 07:32 PM |
#73 |
 -
'caved to the repukes' |
GinaMaria |
Jan-13-10 01:31 PM |
#150 |
 -
But he doesn't have to act like he never campaigned on it, as he's doing now. |
Hello_Kitty |
Jan-10-10 12:14 PM |
#4 |
  -
Clinton and Edwards were always stronger on the public option than Obama. |
pnwmom |
Jan-10-10 12:30 PM |
#15 |
 -
I heard candidate and President Obama promise a public option several times |
Hello_Kitty |
Jan-10-10 12:33 PM |
#17 |
 -
Show me where he used the word "promise." As opposed to "support." n/t |
pnwmom |
Jan-10-10 12:43 PM |
#26 |
 -
Are you trying to to be funny? nt. |
freddie mertz |
Jan-10-10 12:46 PM |
#28 |
  -
No. I think there's an important difference between the words. n/t |
pnwmom |
Jan-10-10 12:49 PM |
#32 |
 -
The word of contention in this case is "campaigned".... |
freddie mertz |
Jan-10-10 12:53 PM |
#39 |
 -
Especially with someone as untrustworthy as Obama. |
jgraz |
Jan-11-10 01:33 PM |
#102 |
 -
Now you're just being an ass. Buh bye. eom |
Hello_Kitty |
Jan-10-10 12:47 PM |
#30 |
  -
Taking your ball and going home? |
tridim |
Jan-10-10 12:50 PM |
# |
 -
We're gonna set up a public plan....." On the U-Tube video |
Armstead |
Jan-10-10 07:40 PM |
#75 |
  -
Yes, he definitely campaigned on it. |
freddie mertz |
Jan-11-10 07:52 AM |
#81 |
 -
your pretzel "logic" is downright just plain silly!! |
shopgreen |
Jan-11-10 02:35 PM |
#111 |
 -
Different issue. Though it is not clear that he tried to "force" anything. |
freddie mertz |
Jan-10-10 12:16 PM |
#6 |
 -
You mean those same senators, that when they ran, also promised a public option? |
inthebrain |
Jan-10-10 12:52 PM |
#36 |
 -
Hard to "force" the Senate to pass a PO when he didn't even bother to push for one |
brentspeak |
Jan-10-10 02:49 PM |
#56 |
  -
He signaled very early his willingness to give it up in fact. |
freddie mertz |
Jan-10-10 03:55 PM |
#66 |
 -
No. He couldn't force them. |
Kltpzyxm |
Jan-10-10 05:18 PM |
#71 |
  -
He came closest to that with "Any bill I sign MUST.." |
freddie mertz |
Jan-10-10 07:03 PM |
#72 |
 -
Ding,ding,ding |
goclark |
Jan-11-10 04:13 AM |
#77 |
 -
Of course, he forces the Senate to *filibuster* drug re-importation |
jgraz |
Jan-11-10 12:07 PM |
#95 |
  -
Pretty easy to explain - |
karynnj |
Jan-13-10 01:31 PM |
#149 |
 -
Obama also said he would veto any bill without a public option! |
shopgreen |
Jan-11-10 02:34 PM |
#110 |
 -
He spouted meaningless platitudes to convince people |
Generator |
Jan-11-10 02:39 PM |
#114 |
 -
How often did you see him use the bully pulpit |
golfguru |
Jan-13-10 01:15 PM |
#145 |
-
Facts do matter |
NJmaverick |
Jan-10-10 12:16 PM |
#5 |
 -
O"Donnell provides real proof, from Obama's own words and campaign website. |
freddie mertz |
Jan-10-10 12:17 PM |
#7 |
  -
Simply put- No he doesn't |
NJmaverick |
Jan-10-10 02:44 PM |
#54 |
 -
Who you gonna believe? Your own eyes and ears? nt. |
freddie mertz |
Jan-10-10 03:05 PM |
#60 |
 -
You linked to Politifact, but their article mostly disagrees with you |
Texastornado |
Jan-10-10 12:23 PM |
#10 |
-
Wonderful catch! LOL X 50000000!!!! |
freddie mertz |
Jan-10-10 12:29 PM |
#13 |
-
Barely true means the people accusing the Presdient of lying |
NJmaverick |
Jan-10-10 02:45 PM |
#55 |
-
Not really. It means they decided to call it "just short" of a lie. |
freddie mertz |
Jan-10-10 03:04 PM |
#59 |
 -
Yes really, it's untrue and a false accuastion to accuse the President of lying |
NJmaverick |
Jan-10-10 03:10 PM |
#63 |
  -
The issue is whether the statement was true or not. |
freddie mertz |
Jan-10-10 03:20 PM |
#64 |
 -
Which is a HUGE pass on what is an obvious falsehood. |
jgraz |
Jan-11-10 12:26 PM |
#99 |
-
You ignored the other question: Why is the public option listed as promise #518? |
Issaiah |
Jan-10-10 05:13 PM |
#70 |
-
This place should be pissed about the lie......... |
KansasVoter |
Jan-10-10 12:18 PM |
#8 |
 -
Obama's "Denial" of the PO promise was his lowest point so far. |
freddie mertz |
Jan-10-10 12:23 PM |
#9 |
 -
And if we were all "pissed" about this.. |
tridim |
Jan-10-10 12:46 PM |
#29 |
  -
All we want are the FACTS, ma'am. The truth shall set you free. |
freddie mertz |
Jan-10-10 12:50 PM |
#34 |
   -
The fact is that President and Candidate Obama supported the PO |
tridim |
Jan-10-10 12:52 PM |
#37 |
  -
He claims he never campaigned on it. nt. |
freddie mertz |
Jan-10-10 12:58 PM |
#41 |
  -
And he is lying. |
KansasVoter |
Jan-10-10 02:55 PM |
#57 |
  -
He campaigned on Health Care Reform.. |
tridim |
Jan-11-10 09:56 AM |
#87 |
  -
The Dems and WH call it "Health INSURANCE reform" now. |
freddie mertz |
Jan-11-10 02:09 PM |
#103 |
  -
Maybe an anecdote from my lunch today can help elucidate the big picture.. |
girl gone mad |
Jan-11-10 05:45 AM |
#79 |
   -
Maybe it's because they've been constantly lied to about the bill? |
tridim |
Jan-11-10 09:54 AM |
#86 |
  -
Wait until Rahm turns his sites on Medicare and Social Security "reform" |
dflprincess |
Jan-11-10 09:16 PM |
#132 |
  -
The big picture is that we thought we were voting for a different kind of politician. |
jgraz |
Jan-11-10 12:29 PM |
#101 |
 -
+1 |
invictus |
Jan-12-10 10:54 AM |
#141 |
-
K&R..the unrec crew is working hard to make this dissapear!! eom |
flyarm |
Jan-10-10 12:29 PM |
#14 |
 -
They try hard, because they know that FACTS MATTER, and thus FEAR the facts. |
freddie mertz |
Jan-10-10 12:33 PM |
#16 |
-
Obama failed at achieving the public option |
gravity |
Jan-10-10 12:34 PM |
#18 |
 -
Because he refuses to just level with us and tell us the truth? |
freddie mertz |
Jan-10-10 12:37 PM |
#23 |
  -
Saying that looks bad politically |
gravity |
Jan-10-10 12:50 PM |
#35 |
   -
He didn't need to deny the facts. |
freddie mertz |
Jan-10-10 01:04 PM |
#42 |
  -
You're putting more importance on him than on getting some sort of |
treestar |
Jan-11-10 04:17 PM |
#129 |
 -
The outrage is directed at Obama because their outrage is ALWAYS directed at Obama |
tridim |
Jan-10-10 12:42 PM |
#25 |
-
Actually, I only posted this because the facts were denied here today. |
freddie mertz |
Jan-10-10 12:49 PM |
#33 |
-
If the public option was important to Obama - as he once claimed |
dflprincess |
Jan-11-10 09:14 PM |
#131 |
-
Oh No! Now I have to vote Republican - clearly more trustworthy! |
stray cat |
Jan-10-10 12:34 PM |
#20 |
 -
THAT'S all you got from this? Sad. |
katandmoon |
Jan-10-10 12:36 PM |
#21 |
 -
Union families hard hit by ObamaCare's tax on their health benefits |
IndianaGreen |
Jan-10-10 12:44 PM |
#27 |
-
Yes he promised, and it passed in the House and not the Senate. |
ProSense |
Jan-10-10 12:39 PM |
#24 |
 -
Except sometimes, when FACTS ARE DENIED. |
freddie mertz |
Jan-10-10 12:48 PM |
#31 |
-
You can continue to be outraged over a comment, but |
ProSense |
Jan-10-10 12:53 PM |
#38 |
-
He is obviously backpedaling here from "must".... |
freddie mertz |
Jan-10-10 12:57 PM |
#40 |
-
Then why is it okay for him to just throw out a near Republican like clumsy, stupid, arrogant lie |
TheKentuckian |
Jan-11-10 04:41 AM |
#78 |
-
Hey! You're stealing someone else's cliche! For shame! K&R |
StarfarerBill |
Jan-10-10 01:07 PM |
#43 |
 -
It's a kind of "response" thread. THIS was one of the FACTS denied over there. |
freddie mertz |
Jan-10-10 01:13 PM |
#44 |
-
Of course they matter; and when faced with them, the locksteppers stumble in their backpedaling. |
StarfarerBill |
Jan-10-10 01:18 PM |
#45 |
-
You are so welcome! |
freddie mertz |
Jan-10-10 01:22 PM |
#47 |
-
The senate bill offered an exchange for those without insurance. |
jaxx |
Jan-10-10 01:19 PM |
#46 |
 -
Fine. But off topic. nt. |
freddie mertz |
Jan-10-10 01:46 PM |
#49 |
-
Maybe not. |
jaxx |
Jan-10-10 02:03 PM |
#51 |
-
By off-topic, I meant that the OP was about whether the prez CAMPAIGNED on a PO. |
freddie mertz |
Jan-10-10 02:24 PM |
#52 |
-
Facts do matter |
MissDeeds |
Jan-10-10 01:45 PM |
#48 |
 -
You bet! |
freddie mertz |
Jan-10-10 01:59 PM |
#50 |
-
Obama succeeded in failing to achieve a public option--as planned |
ima_sinnic |
Jan-10-10 02:39 PM |
#53 |
 -
If Obama HAD been serious about the Public Option he would have made it central to the House Parties |
Phoebe Loosinhouse |
Jan-11-10 07:23 AM |
#80 |
-
interesting--I had never heard feedback about the house party materials |
ima_sinnic |
Jan-11-10 07:56 AM |
#83 |
-
Sorry this particular fact doesn't matter |
Egnever |
Jan-10-10 02:57 PM |
#58 |
 -
If anything, the president undermined himself. I had nothing to do with it. |
freddie mertz |
Jan-10-10 03:07 PM |
#61 |
 -
What does the situation Obama inherited from Bush have to do with HCR? |
brentspeak |
Jan-10-10 04:09 PM |
#67 |
 -
True, it is just not relevant any more |
treestar |
Jan-11-10 04:15 PM |
#128 |
-
In the July 17 video it looks to me like he was still working for a public plan. |
anAustralianobserver |
Jan-10-10 04:17 PM |
#68 |
 -
Far from it in my case. I look at this as a great tragedy. |
freddie mertz |
Jan-10-10 04:42 PM |
#69 |
-
If Tiger was Pres: Tiger Woods never "campaigned on" fidelity, he "ONLY" promised it. WTF?? n/t |
Land Shark |
Jan-10-10 07:36 PM |
#74 |
-
He promised this too>>>>>>>>> |
flyarm |
Jan-11-10 04:07 AM |
#76 |
 -
and he never, ever mentions those, nor does the rest of the MSM except Cafferty, Stewart, |
freddie mertz |
Jan-11-10 07:54 AM |
#82 |
 -
Deleted message |
Name removed |
Jan-11-10 08:15 AM |
#84 |
-
Deleted message |
Name removed |
Jan-11-10 08:40 AM |
#85 |
-
couldnt care less |
mkultra |
Jan-11-10 10:49 AM |
#88 |
 -
Is there no "bullshit" in "reality." |
freddie mertz |
Jan-11-10 11:38 AM |
#89 |
-
still dont care. Its the way politics goes |
mkultra |
Jan-11-10 12:28 PM |
#100 |
-
It is not my problem... It is all of our problem. |
freddie mertz |
Jan-13-10 04:39 PM |
#159 |
-
I'm passed the point.. |
DisgustedInMN |
Jan-11-10 11:52 AM |
#90 |
-
FACTS MATTER: it didn't have the votes in congress. |
dionysus |
Jan-11-10 11:58 AM |
#91 |
 -
Did he campaign on it or not? |
freddie mertz |
Jan-11-10 12:01 PM |
#92 |
-
you act like he has messiah-like powers to bend reality. have you ever dealt |
dionysus |
Jan-11-10 12:04 PM |
#93 |
-
we assume he has messiah-like powers to control what comes out of his own mouth. |
jgraz |
Jan-11-10 12:08 PM |
#96 |
 -
Why won't any of these... |
DisgustedInMN |
Jan-11-10 12:13 PM |
#97 |
-
"Did he campaign on it?" is still the question. |
freddie mertz |
Jan-11-10 02:13 PM |
#105 |
-
The real problem is we've elected another "meaning of *is*" politician |
jgraz |
Jan-11-10 02:45 PM |
#117 |
-
i'm pretty sure he said he supported it, but did he promise it? |
dionysus |
Jan-11-10 02:51 PM |
#120 |
-
He "campaigned" on it. Then, later he said a bill "MUST" have it. |
freddie mertz |
Jan-11-10 02:54 PM |
#122 |
-
then he shouldn't have said it. |
dionysus |
Jan-11-10 03:21 PM |
#124 |
-
Right. He showed a certain contempt for his own electorate on that. |
freddie mertz |
Jan-12-10 10:51 AM |
#139 |
-
Can we keep this pinned to the top of the front page of GD? |
Stinky The Clown |
Jan-11-10 12:07 PM |
#94 |
 -
I can kick it! |
freddie mertz |
Jan-11-10 02:09 PM |
#104 |
 -
I've already bookmarked this one and the other "mostly untrue" thread |
superduperfarleft |
Jan-11-10 02:28 PM |
#109 |
-
Much of it is "pure comedy gold." |
freddie mertz |
Jan-11-10 02:49 PM |
#118 |
-
Now let's be fair. Did Obama ever *promise* to not totally lie to us? |
jgraz |
Jan-11-10 12:24 PM |
#98 |
 -
Get it right. He only "barely lied" to us. n/t |
superduperfarleft |
Jan-11-10 02:15 PM |
#106 |
-
No, he barely told the truth. Which, of course, means |
jgraz |
Jan-11-10 02:19 PM |
#107 |
-
Maybe NJ is just a glass-half-full type of guy. |
superduperfarleft |
Jan-11-10 02:27 PM |
#108 |
 -
The problem is what his glass is half-full *of* |
jgraz |
Jan-11-10 02:35 PM |
#112 |
-
LOL. n/t |
superduperfarleft |
Jan-11-10 02:39 PM |
#115 |
-
My friend is the King of Comedy. |
freddie mertz |
Jan-11-10 02:52 PM |
#121 |
-
I'm here all week. Try the veal. |
jgraz |
Jan-11-10 02:57 PM |
#123 |
-
Unless you are the guy who claims that "barely true" means "100 % honest!" |
freddie mertz |
Jan-11-10 02:51 PM |
#119 |
-
It is like --you can't just be a little pregnant. |
shopgreen |
Jan-11-10 09:18 PM |
#133 |
-
Nancy Pelosi said it best when she said he'd promised "a lot of things" in his campaign. |
David Zephyr |
Jan-11-10 02:36 PM |
#113 |
 -
Her frustration was palpable in the clip. |
freddie mertz |
Jan-11-10 02:42 PM |
#116 |
-
do you remove responsibility from the house and senate whose job it was to get those in the bills? |
dionysus |
Jan-11-10 03:22 PM |
#125 |
-
Excuse me? |
DisgustedInMN |
Jan-11-10 07:46 PM |
#130 |
 -
the best pelosi got out of the house was a weak-ass public option and you know it. |
dionysus |
Jan-12-10 08:04 AM |
#134 |
-
A weak PO can be strengthened much more easily than NO PO can... |
freddie mertz |
Jan-12-10 08:36 AM |
#136 |
 -
i can't disagree with you there. i'm afraid we need to replace all the blue dogs for that to happen. |
dionysus |
Jan-12-10 09:35 AM |
#138 |
-
Well, if this bill goes through in the Senate form.. |
freddie mertz |
Jan-12-10 10:54 AM |
#140 |
-
What the hell are... |
DisgustedInMN |
Jan-12-10 10:54 AM |
#142 |
-
With the glaring exception of Stupak, House bill, while weak, of better than the terrible Senate bi |
freddie mertz |
Jan-12-10 08:35 AM |
#135 |
-
not the end of the road yet |
Rosa Luxemburg |
Jan-11-10 04:12 PM |
#126 |
-
But he's not going to get it |
treestar |
Jan-11-10 04:14 PM |
#127 |
 -
Obama does not WANT the PO, I am now convinced it never mattered to him. |
freddie mertz |
Jan-12-10 08:38 AM |
#137 |
-
Kicking. Talk today about taxes, but let's not forget the public plan. |
freddie mertz |
Jan-13-10 01:05 PM |
#143 |
-
If Obama was a dictator he wouldn't have to deal with the obstructionists in his own party. |
Lord Helmet |
Jan-13-10 01:10 PM |
#144 |
 -
I guess you wish he was a dictator then. nt. |
freddie mertz |
Jan-13-10 01:17 PM |
#146 |
-
hell yes I do on a number of issues -- but that's not the way democracy works |
Lord Helmet |
Jan-13-10 01:25 PM |
#147 |
-
How charming, Lord Metal Head. |
freddie mertz |
Jan-13-10 02:15 PM |
#152 |
-
lol -- name-calling doesn't make your "YOU LIE!!!!" argument any more cogent |
Lord Helmet |
Jan-13-10 02:18 PM |
#154 |
-
Well, at least I am not having waking dreams about dictators. |
freddie mertz |
Jan-13-10 02:24 PM |
#155 |
-
Reality matters too - there is no way to get the public option through the Senate |
karynnj |
Jan-13-10 01:28 PM |
#148 |
 -
Then just admit that. |
freddie mertz |
Jan-13-10 02:17 PM |
#153 |
-
I have said that - and said it repeatedly |
karynnj |
Jan-13-10 02:27 PM |
#156 |
-
Then we actually agree. nt. |
freddie mertz |
Jan-13-10 02:40 PM |
#158 |
-
What does Obama gain from denying this? |
GinaMaria |
Jan-13-10 01:41 PM |
#151 |
 -
He gained nothing of course. It hurt him. He needs better advisors. |
freddie mertz |
Jan-13-10 02:40 PM |
#157 |
-
Obama Demands: The Bill I Sign Must Include Public Option ** |
shopgreen |
Jan-13-10 05:03 PM |
#160 |