Reply #127: Dude, let me share what he explained to me

[Fredda Weinberg]

The relevant quote from the article is, "Challenge rules vary by state. In general, challengers must supply evidence that the voter may not be eligible. Grounds can include that a voter is not a U.S. citizen, is not a resident of the state or county where he or she is registered, or is younger than 18. The complaints are settled by election board members or precinct judges."

That is the national state of the law. In NJ or Ohio, the GOP faces sanctions if they violate an injunction or a ruling. But everywhere else, the acts are despicable and should be ended with public humiliation of the perpetrators.

Confusing legal culpability with unscrupulous behavior only leads to frustration; if you understand why the authorities allow the practice to continue, it's easier to respond intelligently and make a difference.

Can you imagine the patience it took to bring an obscure issue ... scrubbing voter lists ... to the sober attention of the mainstream media and prevent a repetition of legal political activities? Dirty tricks, indeed - and I never had to stretch the truth or personally attack an opponent.

If you have questions, ask. But please, if you've never pounded the table before a patient, wise magistrate - know that the law has depths you have not plumbed.

See you 'round DU.