You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #91: I'm so glad that's your final point. [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
LWolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-28-07 01:00 PM
Response to Reply #89
91. I'm so glad that's your final point.
They've all been too blunt to leave any kind of mark.

Sorry. I'm not playing ball; it's not a game to me. I'm not going anywhere. I'll be right here, and I'll be doing everything in my power to hold corrupt Democrats accountable, and to elect better Democrats to office.

That's not tripe, and it's for the good of all people. So much broader than the purging of all "ilk" that don't march in your line.

Du rules? Haven't broken any yet. I won't campaign against the Democratic candidate in the general election on DU. That would be a waste of time and energy, and would truly be "pointless." At that point, time at DU won't be spent campaigning for any candidate, but on discussing issues and policy. I will, though, make sure that Democrats know that their choices in the primary have consequences in the general election. That's the responsible thing to do.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
  -I SUPPORT EDWARDS, but the thing I REALLY HATE about Clinton, Obama, and Kucinich IS.... Blackhatjack  May-28-07 09:31 AM   #0 
  - I like something about ALL of the candidates! nt  MookieWilson   May-28-07 09:32 AM   #1 
  - Face it, it's a strong field  Warpy   May-28-07 09:36 AM   #2 
  - No - it's not.  Clark2008   May-28-07 10:14 AM   #23 
     - I'm not looking for a LEADER  Warpy   May-28-07 11:01 AM   #55 
        - You can't run a country without leadership  Jai4WKC08   May-28-07 02:34 PM   #96 
  - Funny story about Edwards  Catch22Dem   May-28-07 09:37 AM   #3 
  - sounds good  venable   May-28-07 11:23 AM   #65 
  - I support Kucinich, and I support the nominee.  rucky   May-28-07 09:39 AM   #4 
  - I think winning comes first.  Eagle_Eye   May-28-07 09:39 AM   #5 
  - You certainly frame the issue well ... a Democratic President is essential regarding the SCOTUS...  Blackhatjack   May-28-07 09:47 AM   #8 
  - Edwards supporters don't attack other Democratic Candidates as if they would not be qualified?  wyldwolf   May-28-07 09:43 AM   #6 
  - The OP was directed at all those attacking other Democratic Candidates, (I prefer Edwards)...  Blackhatjack   May-28-07 09:56 AM   #14 
  - The OP was read loud and clear  wyldwolf   May-28-07 10:07 AM   #19 
     - it's called supporting the candidate  venable   May-28-07 11:26 AM   #67 
  - Which Edwards' Positions On His Website Do You Disagree With? Which Should The Dem Party Reject?  Blackhatjack   May-28-07 10:08 AM   #20 
     - his positions are not the issue. The issue is your belief all Dems should line up behind them  wyldwolf   May-28-07 10:09 AM   #21 
     - No you are avoiding the issue, the positions are the issue....  Blackhatjack   May-28-07 10:15 AM   #25 
        - Oh, BS! Here are your exact words:  wyldwolf   May-28-07 10:19 AM   #26 
           - And Again.... Name those positions please? Which are you against?  Blackhatjack   May-28-07 10:23 AM   #28 
           - and again, tell me WHY all Dems should agree with Edwards? Why are you afraid to answer that?  wyldwolf   May-28-07 10:39 AM   #42 
              - I'll Help you out. Are you against Edwards' position set out on his website regarding poverty?  Blackhatjack   May-28-07 10:55 AM   #49 
                 - I'll help you out. Do you think Edwards' policy stances should be a litmus for all Democrats?  wyldwolf   May-28-07 11:01 AM   #54 
                    - So which of Edwards' positions on his website do you think should be rejected by Democrats? Poverty?  Blackhatjack   May-28-07 11:08 AM   #58 
                       - do you think someone isn't a real Democrat if they don't fall in line behind Edwards?  wyldwolf   May-28-07 11:46 AM   #76 
                          - You cannot name one position on Edwards website that you disagree with ....  Blackhatjack   May-28-07 08:11 PM   #113 
                             - do you think someone isn't a real Democrat if they don't fall in line behind Edwards?  wyldwolf   May-29-07 05:59 PM   #132 
           - do you think the OP loves Edwards more than you hate him?  venable   May-28-07 11:28 AM   #68 
              - do you still beat your dog?  wyldwolf   May-28-07 11:47 AM   #77 
                 - I don't get it, sorry.  venable   May-28-07 02:26 PM   #95 
                    - Your original question assumes I hate Edward - but I don't  wyldwolf   May-28-07 06:55 PM   #110 
                       - fair enough  venable   May-28-07 08:17 PM   #114 
                       - I never mentioned a 'gold standard' --that was his characterization....n/t  Blackhatjack   May-28-07 08:23 PM   #116 
                          - call it what you will. In regards to Edward's positions, you said "all Democrats should agree with"  wyldwolf   May-29-07 05:58 PM   #131 
                       - If Edwards' positions on his website should not be endorsed by the Dem Party, name them please....  Blackhatjack   May-28-07 08:20 PM   #115 
                          - do you think someone isn't a real Democrat if they don't fall in line behind Edwards?  wyldwolf   May-29-07 06:00 PM   #133 
     - I don't agree with how he changes his mind when it's politically  Clark2008   May-28-07 10:27 AM   #31 
        - OK, so which positions on his website do you disagree with?  Blackhatjack   May-28-07 10:36 AM   #39 
           - His position on healthcare.  Clark2008   May-28-07 10:41 AM   #44 
              - Edwards' healthcare plan is not a one time fix, it does insure everyone presently uninsured...  Blackhatjack   May-28-07 10:51 AM   #48 
  - beg to differ. criticisms ARE helpful. blind adoration is not. nt  NotGivingUp   May-28-07 09:44 AM   #7 
  - Did you miss this in the OP? It depends on the kind of 'criticism' ...  Blackhatjack   May-28-07 09:51 AM   #10 
  - Thank you!  Grandrose   May-28-07 09:50 AM   #9 
  - Yeah, I read that stuff and think  JNelson6563   May-28-07 09:55 AM   #12 
  - Well done!!  WesDem   May-28-07 09:54 AM   #11 
  - How is that a smear of Clark? Explain, please.  DemItAllAnyway   May-28-07 10:10 AM   #22 
     - "Best. Clarkie. Smear. Ever."  WesDem   May-28-07 10:28 AM   #32 
     - Well, what did you mean by it? This is a sincere question. Repeating what you wrote doesn't clarify.  DemItAllAnyway   May-28-07 10:43 AM   #46 
     - It assumes that only Clark supporters have problems with Edwards  Clark2008   May-28-07 10:29 AM   #34 
        - From the OP "...some so-called Clark supporters" does not paint ONLY CLARK SUPPORTERS...  Blackhatjack   May-28-07 10:43 AM   #45 
        - "IT was an example, of which I am sure you are very familiar."  WesDem   May-28-07 11:23 AM   #66 
        - Not a Clarkie  ripmolly   May-28-07 11:32 AM   #70 
  - I will support the nominee - period  doni_georgia   May-28-07 09:56 AM   #13 
  - When a position pushed by a Dem Candidate bothers me, I imagine a head to head with Repub Candidates  Blackhatjack   May-28-07 10:03 AM   #15 
  - K & R.  William769   May-28-07 10:03 AM   #16 
  - Attacks from supporters...  InvisibleTouch   May-28-07 10:06 AM   #17 
  - I cut it a little differently than you.  LWolf   May-28-07 10:07 AM   #18 
  - What L Wolf said  Lydia Leftcoast   May-28-07 10:24 AM   #29 
  - It is also not a time for a republican President.  William769   May-28-07 10:26 AM   #30 
  - And it is definitely not time for a "Democratic" president who  Lydia Leftcoast   May-28-07 10:28 AM   #33 
  - Repeat after me It is not a time for a republican President.  William769   May-28-07 10:30 AM   #35 
  - One doesn't follow the other.  LWolf   May-28-07 10:40 AM   #43 
     - So your saying a republican President will?  William769   May-28-07 10:46 AM   #47 
        - I'm saying that neither will, which is why  LWolf   May-28-07 10:57 AM   #50 
           - Well we all know well how that works.  William769   May-28-07 10:58 AM   #51 
           - It works when  LWolf   May-28-07 11:02 AM   #56 
              - Never asked you to change you vote.  William769   May-28-07 11:07 AM   #57 
                 - I voted for Gore in 2000.  LWolf   May-28-07 11:14 AM   #62 
                    - Never said you didn't but what you said but thats was one of the excuses  William769   May-28-07 11:19 AM   #63 
                       - I disagree with that talking point.  LWolf   May-28-07 11:33 AM   #71 
                          - Of course you do.  William769   May-28-07 12:24 PM   #82 
                             - No it doesn't.  LWolf   May-28-07 12:26 PM   #84 
                                - I offer the 2000 election.  William769   May-28-07 12:35 PM   #85 
                                   - Which is not evidence of your point. n/t  LWolf   May-28-07 12:36 PM   #87 
                                      - This will be my final point.  William769   May-28-07 12:41 PM   #89 
                                         - I'm so glad that's your final point.  LWolf   May-28-07 01:00 PM   #91 
                                         - Does that include Dems like Lieberman and George C. Wallace?**nm  misanthrope   May-29-07 01:18 AM   #124 
           - Sounds like a true Naderite.  sellitman   May-28-07 11:14 AM   #61 
              - LOL  LWolf   May-28-07 11:36 AM   #73 
                 - Then act like it.  William769   May-28-07 12:36 PM   #86 
                 - I do act like it.  LWolf   May-28-07 12:49 PM   #90 
                 - I was wrong.  sellitman   May-28-07 02:38 PM   #98 
                    - I think calling ALL Democrats...  misanthrope   May-29-07 01:22 AM   #125 
                       - There are plenty of exceptions but overall you are wrong.  sellitman   May-29-07 05:41 AM   #128 
                          - You mean the way those Beltway Dems...  misanthrope   May-29-07 12:49 PM   #130 
  - You said this so much better than I.  LWolf   May-28-07 10:31 AM   #36 
  - Wow... I could have written that!  Clark2008   May-28-07 10:31 AM   #37 
  - You raise an entire list of positions that the Democratic Party must address in its 2008 platform...  Blackhatjack   May-28-07 10:32 AM   #38 
     - I don't want pie  ripmolly   May-28-07 11:45 AM   #75 
  - Hear, hear! "..my vote is mine to give or withold, and it has to be earned."  notsodumbhillbilly   May-28-07 10:39 AM   #41 
  - THAT's the ticket  LWolf   May-28-07 11:00 AM   #52 
  - Glad to see you post "I'll vote for the candidate who best represents democratic principles"  Blackhatjack   May-28-07 11:00 AM   #53 
  - I cut it diffently than you, though I understand your basic point  venable   May-28-07 11:35 AM   #72 
  - I also see your point.  LWolf   May-28-07 11:42 AM   #74 
     - I won't entirely disagree with you  venable   May-28-07 02:34 PM   #97 
        - I support choice.  LWolf   May-28-07 08:40 PM   #118 
           - the metaphor makes sense  venable   May-28-07 10:19 PM   #119 
              - by which i mean, the real stuff  venable   May-29-07 12:49 AM   #123 
  - wolf, lydia, beautiful !  tomp   May-29-07 12:42 AM   #121 
     - Not too many do, lol.  LWolf   May-29-07 06:37 AM   #129 
  - I Am With You  iamjoy   May-28-07 10:14 AM   #24 
  - Good post  nevergiveup   May-28-07 11:10 AM   #60 
  - Keep in mind, IF a Democrat Wins in 2008 ALL the Dem Candidates Will Serve in High Level Positions..  Blackhatjack   May-28-07 10:21 AM   #27 
  - most DU discussion is on issues and track record. If you don't like that, why even show up?  yurbud   May-28-07 10:38 AM   #40 
  - I don't want to attack any of them personally, but we DO need a NON corporate candidate!  calipendence   May-28-07 11:09 AM   #59 
  - You raise important issues that every one of the Dem Candidates must address....  Blackhatjack   May-28-07 11:31 AM   #69 
  - Kucinich  notsodumbhillbilly   May-28-07 11:59 AM   #79 
     - Light-years ahead of the pack on the issues.  LWolf   May-28-07 12:24 PM   #81 
        - He'll get my vote  notsodumbhillbilly   May-28-07 01:45 PM   #93 
           - That's where I am at this point. n/t  LWolf   May-28-07 02:01 PM   #94 
  - ALL THE DEM CANDIDATES should respond when one Dem Candidate is wrongfully attacked by Repubs...  Blackhatjack   May-28-07 11:20 AM   #64 
  - I hate to tell you but by the fall  WesDem   May-28-07 12:21 PM   #80 
  - Sorry but people have a right to question a candidate's actions  Cleita   May-28-07 11:53 AM   #78 
  - I agree with you, Cleita  WesDem   May-28-07 12:26 PM   #83 
  - I Agree With You On The First Two, But I Think Kucinich Is A Far Ways Away From Being Able To Handle  OPERATIONMINDCRIME   May-28-07 12:39 PM   #88 
  - I see Dennis Kucinich kind of like Jesse Jackson was in earlier elections...  calipendence   May-28-07 01:33 PM   #92 
  - Kucinich has more issue breadth than most  dave_p   May-28-07 02:45 PM   #99 
     - To Each Their Own. But I Think His Like 1% In Polls Speaks For Itself.  OPERATIONMINDCRIME   May-28-07 02:57 PM   #100 
        - Indeed it speaks for itself ...  dave_p   May-28-07 05:34 PM   #106 
  - lol  Pastiche423   May-28-07 03:17 PM   #101 
  - How far afield of the OP can you get? Nothing there about 'march(ing) lockstep' ...  Blackhatjack   May-28-07 04:06 PM   #102 
     - Both  Pastiche423   May-28-07 04:35 PM   #104 
     - Reading the other reply to your post...  Sapphire Blue   May-28-07 05:00 PM   #105 
  - Agreed! I support Kucinich, but I think that Edwards's agenda is closest to Kucinich's among the top  Czolgosz   May-28-07 04:17 PM   #103 
  - I couldn't agree with you more Blackhatjack  MODemocrat   May-28-07 05:40 PM   #107 
  - K&R!! Thank you for posting this!  Pushed To The Left   May-28-07 05:51 PM   #108 
  - I think you'll need to tell the candidates this!  WinkyDink   May-28-07 06:34 PM   #109 
  - Kucinich all the way,  bamacrat   May-28-07 07:05 PM   #111 
  - Get used to it. It happens every election cycle  camero   May-28-07 07:12 PM   #112 
  - I support Edwards also, did you listen to Bobby Kennedy interview  grmamo   May-28-07 08:31 PM   #117 
  - better than a repub? now that's faint praise.  tomp   May-29-07 12:24 AM   #120 
  - TRUTH is not an attack  sandnsea   May-29-07 12:45 AM   #122 
  - Hair and houses. (nt)  w4rma   May-29-07 01:24 AM   #126 
  - The one I would support for Prez isn't running....and it's not Gore  cynatnite   May-29-07 01:25 AM   #127 
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC