Recursion
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Dec-13-10 11:16 AM
Response to Reply #47 |
| 52. Jobs was a lot of it. So was ending EPA wetlands protection |
|
I'm not sure why; that may have been a particular ruling in that area or something. People couldn't cut down trees in their backyard. And when I looked into it I think it was actually an Army Corps of Engineers thing, not the EPA.
|
| -Will everyone agree that this is the LAST Obama compromise that could ever be defended? |
Ken Burch |
Dec-13-10 10:22 AM |
#0 |
 -
he hasn't even promised to protect Social Security |
Enrique |
Dec-13-10 10:26 AM |
#1 |
  -
And you're okay with that? |
tavalon |
Dec-13-10 10:39 AM |
#20 |
| -
No because we don't know what other issues he might find himself in a position of. . . |
wndycty |
Dec-13-10 10:27 AM |
#2 |
| -
Deleted message |
Name removed |
Dec-13-10 10:35 AM |
#10 |
| -
That's Not What He Said |
DemocratSinceBirth |
Dec-13-10 10:38 AM |
#16 |
| -
All future compromises have got to be intolerably right-wing |
Ken Burch |
Dec-13-10 10:40 AM |
#22 |
| -
Plenty Of Issues I Will Go The Hill For |
DemocratSinceBirth |
Dec-13-10 10:44 AM |
#25 |
| -
I have core values, I also understand that if we are true progressives. . . |
wndycty |
Dec-13-10 10:48 AM |
#32 |
| -
Interesting that your "strategy" always involves cutting poverty programs more. |
bobbolink |
Dec-13-10 10:58 AM |
#38 |
| -
True, bobbolink. |
Ken Burch |
Dec-13-10 11:00 AM |
#41 |
| -
What I want from them is the same that I want from their cousins, the RW -- HONESTY. |
bobbolink |
Dec-13-10 11:28 AM |
#57 |
| -
So where did I say that cutting poverty was part of my strategy. . . |
wndycty |
Dec-13-10 11:02 AM |
#43 |
| -
Deleted sub-thread |
Name removed |
Dec-13-10 11:13 AM |
#50 |
| -
SS is an anti-poverty program. |
Hello_Kitty |
Dec-13-10 12:19 PM |
#63 |
| -
"when did I say that CUTTING POVERTY was part of my strategy"? |
Ken Burch |
Dec-13-10 02:30 PM |
#73 |
| -
LOL |
Hello_Kitty |
Dec-13-10 12:18 PM |
#62 |
| -
Ken, we keep moving the line further and further and further back. |
Lucky 13 |
Dec-13-10 10:28 AM |
#3 |
| -
The actual line is whether or not a Republican would be more left leaning than Obama. |
BzaDem |
Dec-13-10 10:37 AM |
#13 |
| -
It doesn't HAVE to be "continued compromise or a Republican" |
Ken Burch |
Dec-13-10 10:39 AM |
#21 |
| -
I'm not saying Obama has to surrender to win. |
BzaDem |
Dec-13-10 10:44 AM |
#27 |
| -
We might be headed that way. |
Lucky 13 |
Dec-13-10 10:44 AM |
#26 |
| -
Have you looked at WHY the Republicans are fighting the tax deal? |
BzaDem |
Dec-13-10 10:52 AM |
#34 |
| -
Break it apart. One part is not contingent on another. |
Lucky 13 |
Dec-13-10 12:38 PM |
#67 |
| -
The "payroll tax holiday" is, above all other things, totally unaccptable and indefensible. |
Poll_Blind |
Dec-13-10 10:29 AM |
#4 |
| -
He has ALREADY put SS at risk. The tax holiday is a trojan horse. |
Poboy |
Dec-13-10 10:30 AM |
#5 |
| -
True |
BlueJac |
Dec-13-10 10:31 AM |
#6 |
| -
The next two years are going to be 100% compromise, or Government Shutdown |
rucky |
Dec-13-10 10:31 AM |
#7 |
| -
Obama is not working for us, he is working against us |
somone |
Dec-13-10 10:32 AM |
#8 |
| -
Yeah he should have let the Unemployed go without an extension because he hates the rich |
dkf |
Dec-13-10 10:39 AM |
#19 |
| -
bwahahahaha! |
bobbolink |
Dec-13-10 11:15 AM |
#51 |
| -
He certainly works hard at marginalizing the left. nt |
eilen |
Dec-13-10 02:02 PM |
#68 |
| -
The last one that can be defended? I don't believe THIS ONE can be defended. |
NorthCarolina |
Dec-13-10 10:35 AM |
#9 |
| -
You're right, it can't |
Ken Burch |
Dec-13-10 10:36 AM |
#12 |
| -
I do not believe this has anything to do with compromise. Obama is getting exactly what HE wants. nt |
NorthCarolina |
Dec-13-10 10:37 AM |
#14 |
| -
Bingo. More and more people are seeing behind the curtain. |
bobbolink |
Dec-13-10 11:16 AM |
#53 |
| -
Honestly, you will probably look back on this compromise as the best one he made |
BzaDem |
Dec-13-10 10:35 AM |
#11 |
| -
You're going to be loyal to a man who has NO core values and NEVER fights for us? |
Ken Burch |
Dec-13-10 10:37 AM |
#15 |
| -
What do you mean "loyal to a man?" |
BzaDem |
Dec-13-10 10:41 AM |
#23 |
| -
He can use executive orders. He can rally the base. |
Ken Burch |
Dec-13-10 10:45 AM |
#29 |
| -
"They'll credit it all to Boehner." |
BzaDem |
Dec-13-10 10:54 AM |
#35 |
| -
It didn't have to be this way |
tavalon |
Dec-13-10 10:44 AM |
#28 |
| -
Do you really believe this election was a mandate for compromise? |
tavalon |
Dec-13-10 10:47 AM |
#30 |
| -
God yes |
Recursion |
Dec-13-10 10:56 AM |
#37 |
| -
LOL |
tavalon |
Dec-13-10 10:59 AM |
#40 |
| -
I knocked on doors in eastern Ohio |
Recursion |
Dec-13-10 11:04 AM |
#46 |
| -
In other words, they wanted stuff done |
tavalon |
Dec-13-10 11:07 AM |
#47 |
| -
Jobs was a lot of it. So was ending EPA wetlands protection |
Recursion |
Dec-13-10 11:16 AM |
#52 |
| -
No |
Uben |
Dec-13-10 10:38 AM |
#17 |
| -
As a non-defender, I can say I've seen the defend at all costs Dems |
tavalon |
Dec-13-10 10:38 AM |
#18 |
| -
The majority left are likely paid to do so. -nt |
Poboy |
Dec-13-10 12:20 PM |
#64 |
| -
NO, this country was built on compromise. |
johnaries |
Dec-13-10 10:41 AM |
#24 |
| -
I think this one pretty much did me in |
Robyn66 |
Dec-13-10 10:47 AM |
#31 |
| -
Evidently it is all about "strategy" and political calculation to |
mmonk |
Dec-13-10 10:49 AM |
#33 |
| -
Well, no, I don't agree with that at all |
Recursion |
Dec-13-10 10:55 AM |
#36 |
| -
No Compromises EVER!!! Draw LINES In The SAND!!! MY WAY OR THE HIGHWAY BABY!! YeeeeeeHAWWWWWW!!!!!! |
Beetwasher |
Dec-13-10 10:58 AM |
#39 |
| -
So you think it's silly for this party to EVER stand it's ground? |
Ken Burch |
Dec-13-10 11:01 AM |
#42 |
| -
Destroy Our Enemies, Turn Them Into Ash!!! |
Beetwasher |
Dec-13-10 11:04 AM |
#45 |
| -
This wasn't the ONLY way to do that. |
Ken Burch |
Dec-13-10 11:07 AM |
#48 |
| -
You Tell ME How YOU Would Do It So Those People Do Not Lose Their Benefits. I'll Wait |
Beetwasher |
Dec-13-10 11:08 AM |
#49 |
| -
On any subject of any kind ever? |
treestar |
Dec-13-10 11:03 AM |
#44 |
| -
You and Obama and the Dems |
ProudDad |
Dec-13-10 11:17 AM |
#55 |
| -
No... |
ProudDad |
Dec-13-10 11:16 AM |
#54 |
| -
I stopped defending at health care. n/t |
Bonhomme Richard |
Dec-13-10 11:24 AM |
#56 |
| -
So you gave up on Clinton early? |
elias7 |
Dec-13-10 11:35 AM |
#58 |
| -
Was Clinton worth ANYTHING after 1994? |
Ken Burch |
Dec-13-10 11:44 AM |
#59 |
| -
"if he went down fighting for the public option" |
Bonhomme Richard |
Dec-13-10 11:57 AM |
#60 |
| -
No, brcause it can't be defended |
Tom Rinaldo |
Dec-13-10 12:17 PM |
#61 |
| -
Oh, they'll be defending SS cuts here. The 'deficit' will suddenly become Very Important. eom |
Hello_Kitty |
Dec-13-10 12:22 PM |
#65 |
| -
Things that are not broken should not be fixed. No compromise. |
LucySky |
Dec-13-10 12:24 PM |
#66 |
| -
Obama needs to go on full lefty attack mode. Order Reid to invoke the nuclear option |
Hawkeye-X |
Dec-13-10 02:04 PM |
#69 |
| -
Don't worry, when Obama signs off on cutting SS and Medicare, |
MadHound |
Dec-13-10 02:05 PM |
#70 |
| -
The Obama/GOP tax cut deal is an attack on social security. |
Better Believe It |
Dec-13-10 02:07 PM |
#71 |
| -
The Acolytes will defend ANYTHING |
PurityOfEssence |
Dec-13-10 02:20 PM |
#72 |
| -
You couldn't get every one on this board to agree it's cold outside. |
sarcasmo |
Dec-13-10 02:33 PM |
#74 |
Printer-friendly format
Email this thread to a friend
Bookmark this thread