You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #16: Sherrod Brown -- [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
Hell Hath No Fury Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-08-10 11:34 AM
Response to Original message
16. Sherrod Brown --
pointed out that very thing last night on Rachel. There was zero reason to tie UI to the Bush tx cuts -- XERO.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
  -The extension of UI benefits does not need to be held hostage to the tax cuts for the rich MadHound  Dec-08-10 10:48 AM   #0 
  - they have never been extended conditionally before  Enrique   Dec-08-10 10:51 AM   #1 
  - I was all part of the "shell game". nt  ladjf   Dec-08-10 10:54 AM   #2 
  - Makes you wonder what exactly they are holding that leftover stimulus money for?  Donnachaidh   Dec-08-10 10:56 AM   #3 
  - No. It doesn't make anyone wonder about it. Its money that hasn't been spent yet.  phleshdef   Dec-08-10 11:05 AM   #7 
     - So high speed rail is more important than the unemployed?  Donnachaidh   Dec-08-10 11:30 AM   #14 
        - Considering all the jobs the high speed rail projects would generate, its pretty damn important.  phleshdef   Dec-08-10 12:02 PM   #25 
  - never knew there was a "surplus" of stimulus money...  dennis4868   Dec-08-10 10:57 AM   #4 
  - It's Been A Bedrock Democratic Principle That Unemployment Benefits Not Be Immediately Paid For  DemocratSinceBirth   Dec-08-10 11:00 AM   #5 
  - My post is a republican talking point? Getting rid of tax cuts for the rich  MadHound   Dec-08-10 11:20 AM   #10 
  - no....  dennis4868   Dec-08-10 11:36 AM   #18 
     - Yes, and that is the beauty of it, it was Mitch McConnell's idea  MadHound   Dec-08-10 11:40 AM   #20 
  - There is stimulus money left....  Subdivisions   Dec-08-10 11:24 AM   #13 
     - Sure...  dennis4868   Dec-08-10 11:35 AM   #17 
        - Actually it was a few months back,  MadHound   Dec-08-10 11:43 AM   # 
           - CBO....  dennis4868   Dec-08-10 11:52 AM   #24 
              - Umm, those "directions" are tenative, and can be changed by this administration  MadHound   Dec-08-10 12:05 PM   #26 
                 - UMMMMM....  dennis4868   Dec-08-10 12:15 PM   #31 
                    - Because I read the legislation,  MadHound   Dec-08-10 01:24 PM   #34 
                       - Well I trust Barney Frank.....  dennis4868   Dec-08-10 01:36 PM   #35 
                          - I suppose you trusted Dick Nixon, Reagan, the Bushes and Clinton as well  MadHound   Dec-08-10 01:47 PM   #37 
  - That's one truth that you rarely see mentioned here. nt  Lorien   Dec-08-10 11:03 AM   #6 
  - As the President said:  jaxx   Dec-08-10 11:05 AM   #8 
  - Ah, so now it is being "purist" to want the president and Democratic leadership to fight?  MadHound   Dec-08-10 11:22 AM   #11 
     - When ideals get in the way of common sense, the ideals are too idealistic.  jaxx   Dec-08-10 11:33 AM   #15 
        - Ah, so now it is idealistic to fight for what the public wants  MadHound   Dec-08-10 11:37 AM   #19 
           - I wonder why a good deal isn't good enough.  jaxx   Dec-08-10 11:43 AM   #22 
              - But that's the point of this post  MadHound   Dec-08-10 11:45 AM   #23 
  - He didn't say that.  Life Long Dem   Dec-08-10 11:06 AM   #9 
  - True, but part of the reasoning is that UI is being held hostage as well  MadHound   Dec-08-10 11:24 AM   #12 
  - Sherrod Brown --  Hell Hath No Fury   Dec-08-10 11:34 AM   #16 
  - Right, because Obama can just go to home states and SHAME the Repugs into voting for what he wants..  phleshdef   Dec-08-10 12:05 PM   #27 
     - Well, considering that many presidents before him have done that very thing  MadHound   Dec-08-10 12:08 PM   #28 
        - Really? Which Republican did Clinton shame into doing anything?  phleshdef   Dec-08-10 12:11 PM   #29 
           - Yeah, that's right, trite things like fighting don't matter anymore.  MadHound   Dec-08-10 12:13 PM   #30 
              - LOL. Thats what I thought. You don't have a name do you?  phleshdef   Dec-08-10 12:22 PM   #32 
                 - No, you just don't know your history,  MadHound   Dec-08-10 01:23 PM   #33 
                    - If you know history so well, why can't you produce this Republican's name?  phleshdef   Dec-08-10 01:37 PM   #36 
                       - Gawd, you are a little political child  MadHound   Dec-08-10 01:58 PM   #38 
                          - LOL. Neither of those are examples of what we are talking about here.  phleshdef   Dec-08-10 02:42 PM   #39 
  - How much money is left in that fund? I went to Recovery.gov but I can't find it. n/t  Subdivisions   Dec-08-10 11:43 AM   #21 
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC