You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login

Reply #20: The story about sexual exploitation in the Congo was widely reported years ago [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
struggle4progress Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-06-10 02:10 PM
Response to Reply #9
20. The story about sexual exploitation in the Congo was widely reported years ago
and it was widely discussed here at DU. It was a story with international consequences, and it produced some prosecutions and convictions. The real problem is that the UN itself has no disciplinary authority over troops serving as UN peace-keepers: that authority remains with the country that supplied the troops, so all prosecutions for such offenses must be conducted by the source country

This story was in headlines worldwide in 2004/5. Wikileaks didn't even have a website until 2006
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
  -so why is wikileaks a good thing Hissyspit  Dec-06-10 01:14 PM   #0 
  - That one item alone proves it is.  EmilyKent   Dec-06-10 01:17 PM   #1 
  - K&R n/t  bobthedrummer   Dec-06-10 01:20 PM   #2 
  - Um .. that wasn't a wikileaks revelation. The UN was investigating such stories years earlier  struggle4progress   Dec-06-10 01:26 PM   #3 
  - Proof makes all the difference.  Hissyspit   Dec-06-10 01:35 PM   #9 
     - The story about sexual exploitation in the Congo was widely reported years ago  struggle4progress   Dec-06-10 02:10 PM   #20 
        - I know that.  Hissyspit   Dec-06-10 02:47 PM   #22 
           - The point of your OP seems to be "Wikileaks exposed problems in the Congo  struggle4progress   Dec-06-10 03:22 PM   #24 
  - That one item proves it's a bad idea.......  suston96   Dec-06-10 01:27 PM   #4 
  - Can't solve a problem if you  EmilyKent   Dec-06-10 01:28 PM   #6 
  - Sorry, don't know what that means....  suston96   Dec-06-10 01:34 PM   #8 
  - Yeah, too bad there's no responsible press to follow up on some of what's found. nt  laughingliberal   Dec-06-10 01:49 PM   #18 
  - see post # 3- the UN was aware of this before wikileaks  Bluerthanblue   Dec-06-10 01:49 PM   #17 
  - Deleted message  Name removed   Dec-06-10 01:32 PM   #7 
  - wow...thanks.  goforit   Dec-06-10 01:27 PM   #5 
  - But someone on DU said it was all about Prince Andrew and a blonde with big boobs!!!! nt  laughingliberal   Dec-06-10 01:37 PM   #10 
  - Here's a good one  laughingliberal   Dec-06-10 01:38 PM   #11 
  - That is not a Wikileaks disclosure  jberryhill   Dec-06-10 01:39 PM   #12 
  - Well, I found many reports online when I searched but none dated earlier than this one:  laughingliberal   Dec-06-10 04:07 PM   #31 
     - Try 2004  jberryhill   Dec-06-10 05:53 PM   #38 
        - Looks like Wikileaks released a massive amount of information on it.  laughingliberal   Dec-06-10 06:06 PM   #40 
           - Perhaps some details not known before?  jberryhill   Dec-06-10 06:24 PM   #41 
              - I'm for anyone who gets more information to the public & increases the chance for more people to...  laughingliberal   Dec-06-10 08:42 PM   #43 
  - And another:  laughingliberal   Dec-06-10 01:40 PM   #13 
  - This would have been a better link than just a "wikileaks dump".......  suston96   Dec-06-10 01:43 PM   #14 
  - Oh. Another good one not about the US!  laughingliberal   Dec-06-10 01:44 PM   #15 
  - K&R n/t  Dogtown   Dec-06-10 01:45 PM   #16 
  - One more:  laughingliberal   Dec-06-10 02:00 PM   #19 
  - That's nice ... but there was already an investigation into the bank, which  struggle4progress   Dec-06-10 02:24 PM   #21 
     - Huh. Would tend to make one wonder why they threw such a fit about Wikileaks publishing it.  laughingliberal   Dec-06-10 03:00 PM   #23 
        - There was a referral for criminal investigation and prosecution; I can't address  struggle4progress   Dec-06-10 03:29 PM   #26 
           - Perhaps the point is the information was more widely disseminated by Wikileaks and, thus, became...  laughingliberal   Dec-06-10 03:50 PM   #27 
              - Your claim was "WikiLeaks uncovered the truth behind Iceland's 2009 financial crisis, bringing  struggle4progress   Dec-06-10 04:18 PM   #33 
                 - Wasn't my claim. I took it from the website in the OP. However, I notice you provide no support...  laughingliberal   Dec-06-10 04:46 PM   #34 
                    - Just look at the time frame: your claim is that the 31 July 2009 wikileaks disclosure  struggle4progress   Dec-06-10 05:20 PM   #35 
                       - I don't believe it's possible for you to show they already had all the information contained in...  laughingliberal   Dec-06-10 05:46 PM   #36 
                          - The bank had been taken over by the government  struggle4progress   Dec-06-10 05:49 PM   #37 
                             - Yes. Here's what the site I linked to was questioning:  laughingliberal   Dec-06-10 05:59 PM   #39 
  - .  kgnu_fan   Dec-06-10 03:28 PM   #25 
  - WikiLeaks has the potential to be a vital international resource  Azathoth   Dec-06-10 03:52 PM   #28 
  - He has it set up to carry on just fine if something happens to him. nm  laughingliberal   Dec-06-10 04:00 PM   #29 
     - It won't matter if he turns the organization into a universally reviled pariah n/t  Azathoth   Dec-06-10 04:06 PM   #30 
        - Universally reviled pariah as definded by the US media. Lol. nt  laughingliberal   Dec-06-10 04:08 PM   #32 
  - Wikileaks is good for democracy --- USA needs to take some bitter medicine  kgnu_fan   Dec-06-10 06:40 PM   #42 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators

Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC