You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Attorney: Assange Accused for Not Wearing Condom During Consensual Intercourse [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread		 This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
KoKo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-04-10 05:27 PM
Original message
Attorney: Assange Accused for Not Wearing Condom During Consensual Intercourse
Advertisements [?]
Attorney: Assange Accused for Not Wearing Condom During Consensual Intercourse

A former attorney for WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange has revealed that the sex assault allegations against Assange in Sweden center around his allegedly not using a condom. James Catlin says Assange has been accused of not using a condom during consensual sex with the two accusers. Catlin says Sweden’s justice system is likely to become the
"the laughingstock of the world" if the case proceeds. An international arrest warrant was issued for Assange this week.

http://www.democracynow.org/2010/12/3/headlines#2
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
  -Attorney: Assange Accused for Not Wearing Condom During Consensual Intercourse KoKo  Dec-04-10 05:27 PM   #0 
  - The same could be said for the State Dept.  RUMMYisFROSTED   Dec-04-10 05:36 PM   #1 
  - Is that what he's accused of? Or is the accusation that  pnwmom   Dec-04-10 05:37 PM   #2 
  - The sex was consensual. Please read:  Sapphireprick   Dec-04-10 05:44 PM   #3 
  - Thanks Much for that link to the Herald Sun!  KoKo   Dec-04-10 05:46 PM   #5 
  - the author is a previous attorney of Assange's  TorchTheWitch   Dec-04-10 07:45 PM   #14 
  - I understand a naive sweet teenager admiring a man after he raped her  Sapphireprick   Dec-04-10 08:26 PM   #16 
     - A person who worked in the Swedish foreign service  EFerrari   Dec-04-10 08:30 PM   #17 
  - Written by :"James D. Catlin ... a Melbourne barrister who acted for Assange"  struggle4progress   Dec-04-10 08:47 PM   #20 
  - And there's the key question...  SidDithers   Dec-04-10 07:53 PM   #15 
  - I'm just asking but  Skittles   Dec-04-10 11:39 PM   #27 
  - Does the whole world need to  Nite Owl   Dec-04-10 05:45 PM   #4 
  - How do you mean does the whole world need to know this?  KoKo   Dec-04-10 05:52 PM   #7 
  - I meant that they were digging to find  Nite Owl   Dec-04-10 09:55 PM   #22 
  - Do you realize how ironic your question is?  pnwmom   Dec-04-10 09:47 PM   #21 
     - You're comparing a private citizen with no power and limited means to world governments.  girl gone mad   Dec-04-10 11:16 PM   #23 
        - And many of the people in the documents he released  pnwmom   Dec-04-10 11:36 PM   #26 
  - So this is what Interpol has devolved into  Sanity Claws   Dec-04-10 05:48 PM   #6 
  - Interpol is a joke  somone   Dec-04-10 05:57 PM   #8 
  - transparently corrupt.  nashville_brook   Dec-04-10 06:30 PM   #10 
  - Before this is over, I bet enough puppets to stage a Wagnerian opera will out themselves. nt  EFerrari   Dec-04-10 08:32 PM   #18 
  - What's the fine for that?  Jack Rabbit   Dec-04-10 06:06 PM   #9 
  - Around $700. n/t  girl gone mad   Dec-04-10 11:17 PM   #25 
  - Corrupt world  kgnu_fan   Dec-04-10 06:42 PM   #11 
  - Ellsberg.  Smarmie Doofus   Dec-04-10 06:57 PM   #12 
  - Speaking of Howard Hunt  Sapphireprick   Dec-04-10 07:01 PM   #13 
  - That's one of Assange's lawyers, so shake some salt. And is it everyone's view  struggle4progress   Dec-04-10 08:45 PM   #19 
  - Assange obviously forgot to have them fill out the Sexual Consent Form.  provis99   Dec-04-10 11:17 PM   #24 
  - Exactly HOW many other people were convicted of the same "crime"?  Canuckistanian   Dec-04-10 11:42 PM   #28 
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators

Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC