Reply #41: AND, Palast does not tell you the WHOLE STORY in this video, just his part in it.

[L. Coyote]

We do not get the BIG picture from Palast in this video because he does
not communicate the research of others investigating the election fraud.

Votes were switched so the Oilmen Junta could continue their illegal War.
If you survived the caging, purges, long lines, and challenges, there was
still a 3% chance your Kerry vote was switched to a Bush vote.

In a large subset of Ohio voters, 1 of every 34 votes in the 2004 Presidential election in Ohio, a 6% Kerry-Bush vote-switch is evidenced. This is blatant, and yet the authorities have yet to respond. The US Attorney for Ohio has been informed, and the FBI has also. Meanwhile, Gonzales said, at the Press Club speech, that DoJ takes "voter fraud" seriously. I guess he really does understand the difference between "election fraud" and "voter fraud" after all!

Is this too complicated for the political hires at DoJ to understand?
Read the article. See this proof:
he 2004 Ohio Presidential Election: Cuyahoga County Analysis
How Kerry Votes Were Switched to Bush Votes
http://jqjacobs.net/politics/ohio.html

"I define "vote-switching" as major candidate cross-voting. One major candidate cross-vote changes the election margin by two votes; as one major candidate loses a vote the other gains the cross-vote. Vote-switching is distinguished from cross-voting because impact on results varies depending on for which candidate cross-votes are counted. Vote-switching results when the two major candidates are collocated in the same ballot order position, either from ballot switching between such precincts or voters cross-voting at such locations....."

Here is a thumbnail of a deskpicture-size screen capture illustrating the evidence.
The article introduces the notation. Full-sized image URL: jqjacobs.net/politics/images/cuyahoga_precincts_subsets.jpg



There is a PowerPoint introduction to the article too:



http://jqjacobs.net/politics/vote_switching.ppt