You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #17: The last time a liberal challenged a President perceived as weak, we got 8 years of St. Ronnie. [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
No Elephants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-01-10 04:48 AM
Response to Original message
17. The last time a liberal challenged a President perceived as weak, we got 8 years of St. Ronnie.
And super delegatess, plus formation of the DLC, plus the two 2007-2008 Democrat contenders trying to outdo each other praising Reagan and both putting that slime on their list of Top Ten Presidents EVER.

I heard some pundit say a sitting president who is challenged significantly in the primary loses, period.


Not saying it was cause and effect or that the same thing would happen in these very different times as happened then. Just saying.

I think my party way overreacted to the Nixon and Reagan landslides--or maybe some Party leaders just used them as an excuse to take the Party where they had wanted it to go anyway. (Many Southerners, faced with a fomerly Democratic (includig Dixiecrats) "Solid South" that began turning red under JFK and LBJ.) IMO, I'd rather see a classic Democratic Congress than a Democratic President and a Republican Congress--and classic Democrats had pretty much dominated Congress since Hoover.

But, right now, I think the DLC types and DNC are pretty much one and the same. And, in turn, that has carried the nation rightward, even though plenty of Democratic voters are classic Democrats or left of classic Democrats and very disheartened by now.

I fear a scenario where voters know mostly that they are always unhappy, even if they don't know why, so they just keep throwing out incumbents, be they red or blue. That will happen, I fear, as long as we see no clear differences in the economic policies of the two parties. (And before anyone raises the budget under Clinton, U.S. budget and U.S economy are not one and the same.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC