You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #51: Where does it say he stands up for gay rights? [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
veganlush Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-26-10 06:41 PM
Response to Original message
51. Where does it say he stands up for gay rights?

"John Tyner, a Tea-bagger who stands up for Gay Rights?"

When asked the question "Whens the last time you were seriously inconvenienced or injured by something that big government did?" the first thing listed , according to this post, was "gay rights". maybe he was saying big government was IMPOSING gay rights...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
  -Jeremy Scahill:"The article my magazine, The Nation, published about John Tyner is a shameful smear" sabrina 1  Nov-26-10 02:06 AM   #0 
  - great post, k&r.  krabigirl   Nov-26-10 02:28 AM   #1 
  - I have known The Nation was compromised for years  molly77   Nov-26-10 01:51 PM   #43 
     - Can't disagree with you. They are not independent journalists  sabrina 1   Nov-26-10 07:11 PM   #55 
  - Reporters crave access to folks in power more than just about anything. If the Nation thinks  McCamy Taylor   Nov-26-10 03:41 AM   #2 
  - Yes, I think many 'journalists' will do anything to gain access and  sabrina 1   Nov-26-10 06:31 AM   #7 
  - K&R  Richard Steele   Nov-26-10 04:09 AM   #3 
  - K&R Awesome debunking, Sabrina! I've got one question, though....  Turborama   Nov-26-10 04:48 AM   #4 
  - Hey, Turborama ~  sabrina 1   Nov-26-10 05:15 AM   #6 
     - Hiya, thanks for the reminder. That really makes sense, in more ways than one these days.  Turborama   Nov-26-10 09:12 AM   #19 
        - Lol, well I do that also. But don't stop!  sabrina 1   Nov-26-10 01:03 PM   #40 
  - schop en recommanderen  Gravel Democrat   Nov-26-10 05:12 AM   #5 
  - K & R n/t  malaise   Nov-26-10 06:36 AM   #8 
  - I used to love The Nation.  EFerrari   Nov-26-10 07:00 AM   #9 
  - I think so too.  avaistheone1   Nov-26-10 10:07 AM   #22 
  - Sure seems like shameful gate keeping doesn't it?  pauldp   Nov-26-10 02:57 PM   #45 
  - David Corn effectively shut down any discussion of the Ohio 2004 vote  EFerrari   Nov-26-10 07:16 PM   #57 
     - Same thing happened with Moveon, Daily Kos and a few other  sabrina 1   Nov-26-10 07:43 PM   #60 
        - That's a good question.  EFerrari   Nov-26-10 07:52 PM   #61 
           - Yes, I know, that was when I first discovered DU and used to read  sabrina 1   Nov-26-10 08:05 PM   #62 
  - Let the Nation go the way of ACORN  RufusTFirefly   Nov-26-10 09:49 PM   #66 
  - What comparison are you making? ACORN was targeted by wingnuts.  EFerrari   Nov-26-10 09:53 PM   #67 
     - EF, I admire almost all your posts, but...  RufusTFirefly   Nov-26-10 09:56 PM   #68 
        - I wouldn't want to be responsible for such a directive.  EFerrari   Nov-26-10 10:10 PM   #69 
           - Actually, I don't disagree with that take  RufusTFirefly   Nov-26-10 10:16 PM   #71 
              - Agreed. It's hard not to participate in our national PTSD,  EFerrari   Nov-26-10 10:23 PM   #73 
  - Actually, that's exactly my take on the Nation.  RufusTFirefly   Nov-26-10 10:19 PM   #72 
     - There are a bunch of brilliant people writing but if you ask me  EFerrari   Nov-26-10 10:49 PM   #74 
  - That article was slimey, McCarthyite crap  Bluenorthwest   Nov-26-10 07:13 AM   #10 
  - I am hoping that this incident and the reaction to it from across  sabrina 1   Nov-27-10 12:46 AM   #77 
  - Not only a lousy political smear..  sendero   Nov-26-10 07:24 AM   #11 
  - Actually,  chervilant   Nov-26-10 09:43 AM   #21 
  - 'on the wrong side of the issue as well'. Exactly  sabrina 1   Nov-26-10 02:17 PM   #44 
  - Deleted message  Name removed   Nov-26-10 07:31 AM   #12 
  - It seems to me that the Tea-baggers have been successful at  fasttense   Nov-26-10 07:37 AM   #13 
  - Good point about using the fake grass-roots movement to discredit  sabrina 1   Nov-26-10 07:43 AM   #14 
     - Great work sabrina1.  avaistheone1   Nov-26-10 10:09 AM   #23 
     - +++  DemReadingDU   Nov-26-10 10:11 AM   #24 
  - one of the only handful of times I've rec'd a thread  TorchTheWitch   Nov-26-10 08:42 AM   #15 
  - Thank you, I appreciate that! n/t  sabrina 1   Nov-26-10 11:06 AM   #31 
  - I read Tyner's blog posts going back several months, and decided not  leveymg   Nov-26-10 08:49 AM   #16 
  - K&R I thought it was a hit piece too.  Tatiana   Nov-26-10 08:58 AM   #17 
  - Hats Off to Scahill  NashVegas   Nov-26-10 09:05 AM   #18 
  - K & R and thanks for posting this.  chill_wind   Nov-26-10 09:36 AM   #20 
  - Yes. As is the attempt to defend TSA policy by associating opposition with the Koch brothers.  JackRiddler   Nov-26-10 10:14 AM   #25 
  - So, do ya'll see how it works?  Gold Metal Flake   Nov-26-10 10:17 AM   #26 
  - f 'n a -- k 'n r  nashville_brook   Nov-26-10 10:19 AM   #27 
  - HUGE K & R !!!  WillyT   Nov-26-10 10:23 AM   #28 
  - Even excellent liberal magazines make mistakes, but it's hard to imagine  bertman   Nov-26-10 10:49 AM   #29 
  - Yes, but what is striking about the article is that  sabrina 1   Nov-26-10 10:57 AM   #30 
     - National publications such as magazines and newspapers are usually  bertman   Nov-26-10 11:10 AM   #32 
        - Nearly every article I've read supporting the use, even if  sabrina 1   Nov-26-10 11:35 AM   #34 
  - K&R! -nt  Poboy   Nov-26-10 11:33 AM   #33 
  - The two Nation article writers respond to Greenwald. I don't see a response to Scahill yet.  madfloridian   Nov-26-10 11:40 AM   #35 
  - Thanks, they will have to respond to many people.  sabrina 1   Nov-26-10 11:47 AM   #36 
  - Finally got a chance to read their response to Greenwald.  sabrina 1   Nov-26-10 01:16 PM   #41 
     - I think the term you want is "half-wittedly".  EFerrari   Nov-26-10 07:05 PM   #54 
  - Everyone kick-a-lot!  JackRiddler   Nov-26-10 11:48 AM   #37 
  - Hell yeah!...................k/r  pauldp   Nov-26-10 12:08 PM   #38 
  - K&R (n/t)  ProudDad   Nov-26-10 12:45 PM   #39 
  - Can't recommend this highly enough  somone   Nov-26-10 01:22 PM   #42 
  - This is important. K&R. nt  woo me with science   Nov-26-10 03:02 PM   #46 
  - Well said...Do supporters of the TSA's "security" tactics think it only involves air travel?  GoddessOfGuinness   Nov-26-10 04:55 PM   #47 
  - These measures will never guarantee our safety, because well... they are not designed for it.  liberation   Nov-26-10 05:07 PM   #48 
     - The well-being of the common American is clearly  GoddessOfGuinness   Nov-26-10 05:52 PM   #49 
  - K&R Wow, what an article.  Mimosa   Nov-26-10 06:39 PM   #50 
  - Where does it say he stands up for gay rights?  veganlush   Nov-26-10 06:41 PM   #51 
  - Read more carefully.  Mimosa   Nov-26-10 06:44 PM   #52 
  - right. i read that.  veganlush   Nov-26-10 10:52 PM   #76 
  - See Mimosa's post below. He mentioned list of things the government  sabrina 1   Nov-26-10 07:15 PM   #56 
  - Fuckity-fuck, politics has become "sports team" BS. Policy be damned.  Odin2005   Nov-26-10 07:03 PM   #53 
  - Been that way here forever  TorchTheWitch   Nov-26-10 08:29 PM   #64 
  - k&r  defendandprotect   Nov-26-10 07:18 PM   #58 
  - Learning everytime I come here  kgnu_fan   Nov-26-10 07:27 PM   #59 
  - A big K&R.  20score   Nov-26-10 08:28 PM   #63 
  - I stopped by subscription 5 or 6 yrs ago  Duppers   Nov-26-10 08:31 PM   #65 
  - How very, very sad.....The Nation was, at one time, one of the more reliable sources...  BrklynLiberal   Nov-26-10 10:10 PM   #70 
  - Happy to be the 100th rec  Oilwellian   Nov-26-10 10:52 PM   #75 
  - Not kicked enough  Gold Metal Flake   Nov-27-10 10:14 AM   #78 
  - A Question . . .  GrpCaptMandrake   Nov-28-10 07:59 PM   #79 
     - Good question. The 4th amendment is the most obvious  sabrina 1   Nov-29-10 02:13 AM   #80 
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC