You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #205: What doesn't work with the current policy? [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
scribble Donating Member (129 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-17-10 12:38 PM
Response to Original message
205. What doesn't work with the current policy?
On Usenet political newsgroups, I notice that trolls and flames always appear on any message list and most posters and lurkers just don't read them. I don't think DU has a big problem here, compared to those old Usenet posting days.

Posting useful, on-topic messages works better than moderation to take care of trolls and flames. On newsgroups, I find that making sure we post five to eight good messages a day tend to "shape" the message list in a newsgroup, and strongly discourages off-topic messages of any kind. They still appear; just not as many of them, and a useful post encourages a flame or troll to stay on-topic.

Most threads end after three or four back-and-forth replies... longer threads tend to shrink to just two or three contributors and don't tend bother anybody else, especially if those replies are just back-and-forth flames. The flames just became buried.

Over-moderation works better than anything I know, to kill a newsgroup, an email list, or a message thread -- whether it is on Usenet, Yahoo, or a political website. Even good third-party posters are left feeling "chilled" when they see a post has been deleted. This mild, temporary dismay decrease their posting frequency. If a good poster sees moderation that leaves him/her "chilled" more than two or three times in the space of about a month; they tend to go away and not come back.

So: I personally don't think that a complicated moderation process will work. I think that posters will take care of most trolls and flames in the course of posting. You can't eliminate all trolls and flames from a popular thread; only control their frequency. I think your current moderation methods already control this.

=-=-=

I know that DU has problems that newsgroups and email lists do not have, and threads here still probably need some moderation. I think that DU already does a good job of recognizing harmful and threatening messages without giving undue power, either to grammarian-moderators or to the kiddies and krypto-Republicans they chase through the threads.


sc





Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC