| 8. Sounds like a good idea |
|
Thanks for all of your work.
|
| -Visualize a Democratic Underground where rule-breaking posts are no longer deleted by the moderators |
EarlG |
Nov-16-10 12:12 PM |
#0 |
 -
really/ |
AngryAmish |
Nov-16-10 12:13 PM |
#1 |
| -
Hey, did you get your black belt? |
MadHound |
Nov-16-10 12:13 PM |
#2 |
  -
I only have a black belt in Tekken |
EarlG |
Nov-16-10 12:15 PM |
#4 |
| -
If we don't edit our posts, are you guys gonna kick our ass? |
Dr.Phool |
Nov-16-10 01:49 PM |
#69 |
| -
YAY for Elad!!! |
bigwillq |
Nov-16-10 04:53 PM |
#115 |
| -
Good one! |
CLANG |
Nov-16-10 08:29 PM |
#133 |
| -
"Oh No! Dad got Feng Wei!" |
The Doctor. |
Nov-17-10 10:53 AM |
#197 |
| -
Sounds like more work for you guys but |
walldude |
Nov-16-10 12:15 PM |
#3 |
| -
Let me be the first K&R |
SharonRB |
Nov-16-10 12:15 PM |
#5 |
| -
what do I think? |
northzax |
Nov-16-10 12:16 PM |
#6 |
| -
I agree - a great idea. |
appal_jack |
Nov-16-10 03:59 PM |
#107 |
| -
Sounds fair to me. n/t |
CakeGrrl |
Nov-16-10 12:16 PM |
#7 |
| -
Sounds like a good idea |
PBS Poll-435 |
Nov-16-10 12:16 PM |
#8 |
| -
Great idea; I've actually posted things I regret posting, gotten responses before |
blondeatlast |
Nov-16-10 12:16 PM |
#9 |
| -
We did the "cool down" thing in 2004 and it didn't go particularly well. |
Renew Deal |
Nov-16-10 12:32 PM |
#23 |
| -
I don't think it punishes for deleting vs editing |
tkmorris |
Nov-16-10 12:54 PM |
#38 |
| -
Disagree. I think self deleting rather than being willing to move towards more civil debate, |
laughingliberal |
Nov-16-10 01:08 PM |
#48 |
| -
I think this is a very good idea. |
CaliforniaPeggy |
Nov-16-10 12:17 PM |
#10 |
| -
Great idea. I like it. nt |
sufrommich |
Nov-16-10 12:17 PM |
#11 |
| -
You guys are awesome, thanks for this. |
no limit |
Nov-16-10 12:18 PM |
#12 |
| -
What's important is this-- |
blondeatlast |
Nov-16-10 12:19 PM |
#13 |
| -
Thank you! Rec'd. I like this, it's galling not to know why, or even if, your post was deleted |
Catherina |
Nov-16-10 12:19 PM |
#14 |
| -
great way to encourage ownership of one's own words. |
nashville_brook |
Nov-16-10 12:20 PM |
#15 |
| -
Sounds like a good idea. |
Arkansas Granny |
Nov-16-10 12:20 PM |
#16 |
| -
I welcome this change. It sounds very constructive. |
ixion |
Nov-16-10 12:21 PM |
#17 |
| -
I donated after I read Skinner's post earlier because I welcomed the changes. |
CTyankee |
Nov-16-10 12:21 PM |
#18 |
| -
Sounds fine, but I would like to point out a minor bug...I mentioned this |
TK421 |
Nov-16-10 12:23 PM |
#19 |
| -
I'm not familiar with that PM bug |
EarlG |
Nov-16-10 12:36 PM |
#26 |
| -
Got it, thanks...n/t |
TK421 |
Nov-16-10 12:39 PM |
#28 |
| -
I think the NEW MESSAGES indicator only shows up on the main pages (Latest, Greatest, etc.)... |
Make7 |
Nov-17-10 12:02 AM |
#166 |
| -
The Time-Out is brilliant. nt |
glitch |
Nov-16-10 12:26 PM |
#20 |
| -
Why do you want to make members and moderators jump through so many hoops? |
Renew Deal |
Nov-16-10 12:29 PM |
#21 |
| -
I think most members already 'self moderate' |
leftstreet |
Nov-16-10 02:30 PM |
#91 |
| -
It sounds like people will be able to break the rules before they follow them. n/t |
LoZoccolo |
Nov-16-10 12:30 PM |
#22 |
| -
i wonder if this applies to replies? |
boston bean |
Nov-16-10 12:42 PM |
#31 |
| -
That's probably still preferable to the way it is now |
EarlG |
Nov-16-10 12:56 PM |
#42 |
| -
I do see what you're saying, and I've previously held back on ideas about |
LoZoccolo |
Nov-16-10 01:03 PM |
#46 |
| -
I'm glad to hear that |
EarlG |
Nov-16-10 01:22 PM |
#55 |
| -
Brilliant. |
David Zephyr |
Nov-16-10 12:32 PM |
#24 |
| -
Is what you're saying different than what LoZoccolo is saying? |
Renew Deal |
Nov-16-10 12:35 PM |
#25 |
| -
Except that I do not think that that is a good thing. |
LoZoccolo |
Nov-16-10 12:39 PM |
#29 |
| -
I don't care for that one either |
Renew Deal |
Nov-16-10 12:41 PM |
#30 |
| -
I can see that; people would start new threads to continue the ones from which they were banished. |
LoZoccolo |
Nov-16-10 12:55 PM |
#41 |
| -
I'm not sure about your "dedicated partisan" forum idea...or maybe I have a different |
CTyankee |
Nov-16-10 01:31 PM |
#63 |
| -
Here's my view of what I'd like a "dedicated partisan" forum to be. |
LoZoccolo |
Nov-16-10 02:29 PM |
#88 |
| -
It's a good idea. I like a forum where there are constructive suggestions made, not complaints. |
CTyankee |
Nov-16-10 04:26 PM |
#110 |
| -
Some were TS'd for less. Purges are never pretty, and the aftermath |
John Commonsense |
Nov-16-10 09:12 PM |
#145 |
| -
EVERYONE who was td's feels its unfair. otherwise they would have to admit to being wrong |
La Lioness Priyanka |
Nov-16-10 09:16 PM |
#146 |
| -
And those who were TS'd unfairly? Do they have to admit being wrong as well? |
John Commonsense |
Nov-16-10 11:15 PM |
#160 |
| -
generally speaking i think du takes far too long to TS, rarely have i seen it be far too quick |
La Lioness Priyanka |
Nov-17-10 06:39 PM |
#212 |
| -
Like. |
emilyg |
Nov-16-10 12:36 PM |
#27 |
| -
That's ridiculous. I can't believe you are doing this. |
KittyWampus |
Nov-16-10 12:42 PM |
#32 |
| -
Perhaps you could share your reasoning? |
tkmorris |
Nov-16-10 12:56 PM |
#45 |
| -
I think this iw worth a test drive. |
Ozymanithrax |
Nov-16-10 12:44 PM |
#33 |
| -
I'd like to see some editing/formatting upgrades. |
immoderate |
Nov-16-10 12:50 PM |
#34 |
| -
I would SO love autoformatting here. |
Hissyspit |
Nov-16-10 12:56 PM |
#44 |
| -
Yes, yes, yes! nt |
blondeatlast |
Nov-16-10 01:05 PM |
#47 |
| -
Good idea, but I have a suggestion re: the PM's..... |
A HERETIC I AM |
Nov-16-10 12:51 PM |
#35 |
| -
Agreed; I spend virtually all my time in GD; that would be very helpful, IMHO. nt |
blondeatlast |
Nov-16-10 01:36 PM |
#65 |
| -
Will be an interesting experiment for you |
snooper2 |
Nov-16-10 12:52 PM |
#36 |
| -
Visualize whirled peas. |
damntexdem |
Nov-16-10 12:52 PM |
#37 |
| -
I don't know I like this. |
Behind the Aegis |
Nov-16-10 12:55 PM |
#39 |
| -
=1 |
foxfeet |
Nov-16-10 02:06 PM |
#78 |
| -
I like this idea! (Of course, I'm not modding this term... heheheh) |
TygrBright |
Nov-16-10 12:55 PM |
#40 |
| -
it may take some time getting use to what is now not acceptable |
seabeyond |
Nov-16-10 12:56 PM |
#43 |
| -
I think it's worth a test drive. |
myrna minx |
Nov-16-10 01:09 PM |
#49 |
| -
It sounds extremely fair: the second chance, time away from posting. |
pacalo |
Nov-16-10 01:09 PM |
#50 |
| -
You are making extra work for yourself. Enforce the rules or don't. nt |
AtomicKitten |
Nov-16-10 01:11 PM |
#51 |
| -
Well, it's better than the current system, BUT..... |
MicaelS |
Nov-16-10 01:11 PM |
#52 |
| -
The 60 minute window doesn't apply to this system |
EarlG |
Nov-16-10 01:18 PM |
#53 |
| -
OK, that sounds good, |
MicaelS |
Nov-16-10 01:21 PM |
#54 |
| -
Yeah, this is something we've been considering on and off for a long time |
EarlG |
Nov-16-10 01:25 PM |
#59 |
| -
Thank you very much. n/t |
MicaelS |
Nov-16-10 01:27 PM |
#60 |
| -
Thank you, time is my concern here since post and get off for the rest of the day |
uppityperson |
Nov-16-10 02:15 PM |
#80 |
| -
The problem, as I see it, is that a lot of the deleted posts are essentially content-free. |
Warren DeMontague |
Nov-16-10 01:24 PM |
#56 |
| -
But some of the posts that are deleted do clearly show what a jerk or homophobe |
Lex |
Nov-16-10 01:31 PM |
#62 |
| -
O/T, but I *so* want a smiley of someone stirring a murky pot. |
gkhouston |
Nov-16-10 02:05 PM |
#76 |
| -
That's true |
EarlG |
Nov-16-10 01:32 PM |
#64 |
| -
Okay, I missed that part. |
Warren DeMontague |
Nov-16-10 02:18 PM |
#81 |
| -
is the "whatever" referring to sexism here, because a lot of mods look the other way |
bettyellen |
Nov-16-10 07:04 PM |
#125 |
| -
K & R nm |
laughingliberal |
Nov-16-10 01:24 PM |
#57 |
| -
"Democrats as well as the robust criticism of Democrats from a liberal perspective." |
LynneSin |
Nov-16-10 01:25 PM |
#58 |
| -
Maybe it should read center-left/liberal? |
GreenPartyVoter |
Nov-18-10 03:12 PM |
#217 |
| -
Sounds good enough to give it a shot, to me. nt. |
Hosnon |
Nov-16-10 01:28 PM |
#61 |
| -
K&R |
Angry Dragon |
Nov-16-10 01:36 PM |
#66 |
| -
I predict abuse of this feature. |
JVS |
Nov-16-10 01:39 PM |
#67 |
| -
LOL, bet you didn't have to break a sweat to make *that* prediction. n/t |
gkhouston |
Nov-16-10 01:57 PM |
#73 |
| -
Recommended. |
H2O Man |
Nov-16-10 01:43 PM |
#68 |
| -
ah, you and your concerns can go take a flying fuck elsewhere!!!@#! |
TK421 |
Nov-16-10 08:08 PM |
#129 |
| -
Nice. |
Iggo |
Nov-16-10 08:53 PM |
#139 |
| -
So this would temporarily lock & hide an OP with an issue? |
yowzayowzayowza |
Nov-16-10 01:51 PM |
#70 |
| -
That brings up the question of what happens with threads that would be locked now |
muriel_volestrangler |
Nov-16-10 04:05 PM |
#109 |
| -
I have no objection to trying it |
struggle4progress |
Nov-16-10 01:53 PM |
#71 |
| -
Will responses to the offending post be visible during the "cool-off" |
blondeatlast |
Nov-16-10 01:54 PM |
#72 |
| -
This is a good point. If someone spawns a semi-inflammatory subthread, you |
gkhouston |
Nov-16-10 02:00 PM |
#74 |
| -
You guys think of everything |
NNN0LHI |
Nov-16-10 02:03 PM |
#75 |
| -
Well, they kind of SEE everything--and act on it with reason |
blondeatlast |
Nov-16-10 02:05 PM |
#77 |
| -
This is getting waaaaaay too complicated. |
JuniperLea |
Nov-16-10 02:07 PM |
#79 |
| -
I would not want to be here. I do not want to be part of a site that lets |
jwirr |
Nov-16-10 02:21 PM |
#82 |
| -
Actually, disruptors would have a much harder time, |
LWolf |
Nov-16-10 08:34 PM |
#135 |
| -
That's how I see it. nt |
laughingliberal |
Nov-16-10 10:55 PM |
#155 |
| -
Very interesting. Intelligent discussion flies out the window when personal insults begin. |
saracat |
Nov-17-10 02:14 PM |
#207 |
| -
I've Had Posts Deleted |
marketbreakaway |
Nov-16-10 02:22 PM |
#83 |
| -
I like the edit request thingy. |
lonestarnot |
Nov-16-10 02:24 PM |
#84 |
| -
Sounds good. |
TexasObserver |
Nov-16-10 02:25 PM |
#85 |
| -
Good idea, man you guys are full of great ideas! |
Rex |
Nov-16-10 02:28 PM |
#86 |
| -
Incredibly awesome!!!! Best DU change EVER! |
obxhead |
Nov-16-10 02:28 PM |
#87 |
| -
ack double post EOM |
pitohui |
Nov-16-10 02:30 PM |
#89 |
| -
i think it sounds like a real hassle |
pitohui |
Nov-16-10 02:30 PM |
#90 |
| -
lol |
Cronus Protagonist |
Nov-16-10 02:58 PM |
#98 |
| -
If someone didn't return to DU for some time, it'd be rather like it is now |
muriel_volestrangler |
Nov-16-10 03:49 PM |
#104 |
| -
Sounds like a very possibly constructive solution, Worth the try. |
chill_wind |
Nov-16-10 02:32 PM |
#92 |
| -
I applaud this approach, but... |
SDuderstadt |
Nov-16-10 02:36 PM |
#93 |
| -
I love you man! |
WingDinger |
Nov-16-10 02:45 PM |
#94 |
| -
Damn, that sounds like a lot of work |
quinnox |
Nov-16-10 02:47 PM |
#95 |
| -
I sincerely want to thank you. |
Joe Fields |
Nov-16-10 02:47 PM |
#96 |
| -
AFAIK the "rule violations" I've been accused of, were in the minds of the moderators |
Cronus Protagonist |
Nov-16-10 02:51 PM |
#97 |
| -
*snort* |
blondeatlast |
Nov-16-10 08:12 PM |
#130 |
| -
Or #3, Give Skittles a job |
Hawkeye-X |
Nov-16-10 03:00 PM |
#99 |
| -
+44-6 |
taterguy |
Nov-16-10 04:50 PM |
#113 |
| -
Yes INDEED! |
Adsos Letter |
Nov-18-10 03:54 PM |
#218 |
| -
A fair hearing is fine. I like this change a lot. |
herbm |
Nov-16-10 03:11 PM |
#100 |
| -
So you are not just going to ban people without at least giving them a heads up |
Peacetrain |
Nov-16-10 03:16 PM |
#101 |
| -
I think he said (further up the thread) that |
Wednesdays |
Nov-16-10 10:50 PM |
#154 |
| -
One potential problem - |
Geoff R. Casavant |
Nov-16-10 03:39 PM |
#102 |
| -
That sounds a good solution to me |
muriel_volestrangler |
Nov-16-10 03:56 PM |
#105 |
| -
K&R! For one of the most important DU posts ever... |
Rhiannon12866 |
Nov-16-10 03:48 PM |
#103 |
| -
Thank you Skinner! What a brilliant idea! |
Odin2005 |
Nov-16-10 03:58 PM |
#106 |
| -
You should have a function where, for a fee, donors can view the pms between the mod and the poster. |
rug |
Nov-16-10 04:00 PM |
#108 |
| -
I like that idea. The mod's identity could be concealed. |
gkhouston |
Nov-16-10 08:34 PM |
#134 |
| -
See #116. |
rug |
Nov-16-10 09:01 PM |
#141 |
| -
And for a slightly lesser fee, you can see the mod or the poster posing naked. |
Wednesdays |
Nov-16-10 10:55 PM |
#156 |
| -
Will this happen in the I/P forum as well? |
Violet_Crumble |
Nov-16-10 04:32 PM |
#111 |
| -
I approve, and I admire your courage and industry. |
bemildred |
Nov-16-10 04:46 PM |
#112 |
| -
Brilliant plan! |
Toucano |
Nov-16-10 04:52 PM |
#114 |
| -
What if someone disagrees with the moderator? |
Cronus Protagonist |
Nov-16-10 05:22 PM |
#116 |
| -
Yeah, it might sometimes be nice to discuss it. |
PeaceNikki |
Nov-16-10 05:31 PM |
#120 |
| -
Sounds great. n/t |
Tx4obama |
Nov-16-10 05:27 PM |
#117 |
| -
Sounds like you folks have put some.. |
The Uncola |
Nov-16-10 05:29 PM |
#118 |
| -
This sound suspiciously like the MPAA |
LawnLover |
Nov-16-10 05:30 PM |
#119 |
| -
From a mod point of view, and only my point of view, I'm not speaking for all mods... |
Kerrytravelers |
Nov-16-10 06:08 PM |
#121 |
| -
It looks great in principle. Try it and see if how it works in practice. nt |
GliderGuider |
Nov-16-10 06:14 PM |
#122 |
| -
Brilliant! Very fair and adult response to the problem! Thanks... |
ProudDad |
Nov-16-10 06:41 PM |
#123 |
| -
From a Behavioral Point of View, |
On the Road |
Nov-16-10 07:02 PM |
#124 |
| -
And what happens if the member is no longer on the board when the request is made, say bedtime? |
DainBramaged |
Nov-16-10 07:06 PM |
#126 |
| -
KICK. ASS. |
WilliamPitt |
Nov-16-10 07:11 PM |
#127 |
| -
Great idea, IMO, and worth a try n/t |
pipi_k |
Nov-16-10 07:19 PM |
#128 |
| -
Heh, behavior modification 101 |
flying rabbit |
Nov-16-10 08:23 PM |
#131 |
| -
Make it 24 hours. People (including me) will get the message. |
CLANG |
Nov-16-10 08:27 PM |
#132 |
| -
I love it :) |
varelse |
Nov-16-10 08:38 PM |
#136 |
| -
I think it will work. |
crim son |
Nov-16-10 08:46 PM |
#137 |
| -
Excellent! n/t |
krispos42 |
Nov-16-10 08:49 PM |
#138 |
| -
i think 15 min is not a deterrent. at the very least it wouldnt deter me |
La Lioness Priyanka |
Nov-16-10 08:58 PM |
#140 |
| -
Most forums I visit hae a "Dont be a jerk" rule |
pasto76 |
Nov-16-10 09:01 PM |
#142 |
| -
Vizualize whirled peas too. |
RoccoR5955 |
Nov-16-10 09:02 PM |
#143 |
| -
I think an increase in item 1) is going to lead to a decrease in item 2). |
harun |
Nov-16-10 09:03 PM |
#144 |
| -
Good |
WolverineDG |
Nov-16-10 09:30 PM |
#147 |
| -
We do actually cite at least one rule for removing posts, etc,. when discussing an alert. |
Kerrytravelers |
Nov-17-10 12:21 AM |
#167 |
| -
I agree. This is a very significant improvement. |
TexasObserver |
Nov-17-10 03:38 AM |
#173 |
| -
I never received any such notice |
WolverineDG |
Nov-17-10 06:42 AM |
#177 |
| -
It's always recorded along with the deleted post, for mods and admin to see |
muriel_volestrangler |
Nov-17-10 08:48 AM |
#185 |
| -
Well, that was my experience |
WolverineDG |
Nov-17-10 10:49 AM |
#196 |
| -
No notices were ever sent. |
Kerrytravelers |
Nov-17-10 11:13 AM |
#200 |
| -
I pretty unambiguously hate this idea. |
Chan790 |
Nov-16-10 09:39 PM |
#148 |
| -
I wish more liberals agreed with you - I know I do. |
theFrankFactor |
Nov-17-10 07:34 AM |
#181 |
| -
Hmmm...I'm not really seeing... |
pipi_k |
Nov-17-10 09:40 AM |
#189 |
| -
Question |
tavalon |
Nov-16-10 09:44 PM |
#149 |
| -
I like it. |
klook |
Nov-16-10 10:12 PM |
#150 |
| -
dude, haven't found work since sept 2008 |
DeadEyeDyck |
Nov-16-10 10:12 PM |
#151 |
| -
So you can't be uncivil to other posters but you can say just about any uncivil thing about |
Pirate Smile |
Nov-16-10 10:13 PM |
#152 |
| -
Skinner covered that in his thread. Here's the link in case you missed it. |
EFerrari |
Nov-16-10 11:55 PM |
#165 |
| -
Question: Can we have robust criticism of Liberals from a Democratic |
WonderGrunion |
Nov-16-10 10:33 PM |
#153 |
| -
Thank You. |
alittlelark |
Nov-16-10 11:01 PM |
#157 |
| -
I support this wholeheartedly, in theory |
Wednesdays |
Nov-16-10 11:03 PM |
#158 |
| -
If the poster isn't told what rule they are violating |
EFerrari |
Nov-16-10 11:53 PM |
#164 |
| -
AFAIK, The plan is that they will be. |
Dead_Parrot |
Nov-17-10 04:42 AM |
#175 |
| -
I've been here 7+ years and I have never had that happen. |
Renew Deal |
Nov-17-10 07:29 AM |
#180 |
| -
It has been done. |
Kerrytravelers |
Nov-17-10 06:30 PM |
#211 |
| -
Good to know. |
EFerrari |
Nov-17-10 11:17 AM |
#201 |
| -
Does this mean I can talk about that rash on my cock now? |
HEyHEY |
Nov-16-10 11:07 PM |
#159 |
| -
Throw 'em in The Penalty Box till they pick up their own poop! I like it! |
Hassin Bin Sober |
Nov-16-10 11:18 PM |
#161 |
| -
+1 nt |
laughingliberal |
Nov-17-10 09:58 AM |
#193 |
| -
Great idea! K&R n/t |
pengillian101 |
Nov-16-10 11:34 PM |
#162 |
| -
Excellent idea. Hope the moderators have time to implement it properly n/t |
eridani |
Nov-16-10 11:44 PM |
#163 |
| -
What about when your post gets sent to Israel-Palestine even though it is |
McCamy Taylor |
Nov-17-10 12:50 AM |
#168 |
| -
Too bad you can't make it retroactive to the archives. |
Jamastiene |
Nov-17-10 12:55 AM |
#169 |
| -
sounds intriguing -- a few questions/comments about subthreads |
fishwax |
Nov-17-10 01:00 AM |
#170 |
| -
Good point. n/t |
Shining Jack |
Nov-17-10 01:07 AM |
#171 |
| -
Sounds to me like an IMPROVEMENT to the system. TRY IT! |
Celtic Merlin |
Nov-17-10 01:54 AM |
#172 |
| -
Freedom of speech! |
riverdale |
Nov-17-10 03:14 PM |
#209 |
| -
You prefer the current method? |
Celtic Merlin |
Nov-17-10 03:50 PM |
#210 |
| -
As Pete Seeger once said |
DFW |
Nov-17-10 04:16 AM |
#174 |
| -
OK, sounds fair |
era veteran |
Nov-17-10 06:02 AM |
#176 |
| -
Makes sense, it's a fair way to go. |
DemocraticPilgrim |
Nov-17-10 06:43 AM |
#178 |
| -
Sounds good on paper |
zipplewrath |
Nov-17-10 07:25 AM |
#179 |
| -
I'm fascinated, and eager to see how this plays out. |
LWolf |
Nov-17-10 07:40 AM |
#182 |
| -
Sounds do-able |
Plucketeer |
Nov-17-10 07:47 AM |
#183 |
| -
While I applaud all of your hard work... |
Javaman |
Nov-17-10 08:00 AM |
#184 |
| -
Wow... |
MilitarismFTL |
Nov-17-10 08:48 AM |
#186 |
| -
What you guys should do is stop moderating AT ALL for a week. |
Evoman |
Nov-17-10 09:16 AM |
#187 |
| -
The new standards should make DU stronger and |
yellerpup |
Nov-17-10 09:23 AM |
#188 |
| -
excellent idea... |
madrchsod |
Nov-17-10 09:43 AM |
#190 |
| -
Excellent idea. |
mikelgb |
Nov-17-10 09:48 AM |
#191 |
| -
any time you give yourself more options, you can do a better job nt |
durkermaker |
Nov-17-10 09:57 AM |
#192 |
| -
I like the idea. Emphasizes what makes DU different |
garthranzz |
Nov-17-10 10:16 AM |
#194 |
| -
Maybe this should have been a poll. |
LiberalAndProud |
Nov-17-10 10:22 AM |
#195 |
| -
Not bad, but you should NOT have a penalty period |
grahamhgreen |
Nov-17-10 10:58 AM |
#198 |
| -
Excellent!! The only improvement I would put on that is to put such posts in their own forum. |
patrice |
Nov-17-10 10:59 AM |
#199 |
| -
Sounds very fair, but more work for the Admins. K&R eom |
BlueCaliDem |
Nov-17-10 11:43 AM |
#202 |
| -
May well lead to longer, more thought out posts. |
The Green Manalishi |
Nov-17-10 12:01 PM |
#203 |
| -
I like it and look forward to it's implementation. |
John Q. Citizen |
Nov-17-10 12:17 PM |
#204 |
| -
What doesn't work with the current policy? |
scribble |
Nov-17-10 12:38 PM |
#205 |
| -
These policies would be an improvement |
dreamnightwind |
Nov-17-10 01:59 PM |
#206 |
| -
"You spill it, you wipe it up". |
dixiegrrrrl |
Nov-17-10 02:37 PM |
#208 |
| -
LOVE the very sane reasoning behind these changes.....it's a very affirming and caring |
defendandprotect |
Nov-17-10 08:15 PM |
#213 |
| -
I think all messages should stay in place with a few changes |
ecstatic |
Nov-18-10 06:13 AM |
#214 |
| -
Love it! |
LiberalLovinLug |
Nov-18-10 03:04 PM |
#215 |
| -
LOVE IT AND I WILL DONATE NEXT WEEK! |
Dr Fate |
Nov-18-10 03:10 PM |
#216 |
Printer-friendly format
Email this thread to a friend
Bookmark this thread
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore